From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail115-171.sinamail.sina.com.cn (mail115-171.sinamail.sina.com.cn [218.30.115.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398131DED44 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=218.30.115.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735295430; cv=none; b=tSwkOG843djyGksa/6vp9JbGU3FIZB9S0RTDsIg97M7E9wQKLpPtYj2TqVKE3oYDLNEH6kcPmlwucd8ggBzfLbhv229cOU/SxFeqzzgcs1hE7KUfXn+BA9pAGxHyHPGsMqCNnX0hB5hq6B0lhtoXxdIild3i7aj7520e1QknPGo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735295430; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SMLsE0U9FH+Bv8ghB7ayyPd2lqG2PDlNEtyupkYnpwI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qAnH7I6uFPxHvSVGjDtV40cA18k7OYsVfneptJAKEZ8V5HsQwdmoJ8611CUju0FLOrP/Wm6Cr2Gln8GgJwn7nknf0SIy+tb/LcQeOIrPWtnQAOsv8+xv/pApNJ8zhyIrgxySJBWI/E/H9R+HcGpj8EiFQXgzk+2TDUInKZqiPgo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sina.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sina.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=218.30.115.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sina.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sina.com X-SMAIL-HELO: localhost.localdomain Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain)([113.118.68.60]) by sina.com (10.185.250.24) with ESMTP id 676E81B200007908; Fri, 27 Dec 2024 18:30:15 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: hdanton@sina.com X-Auth-ID: hdanton@sina.com Authentication-Results: sina.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=hdanton@sina.com; dkim=none header.i=none; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hdanton@sina.com X-SMAIL-MID: 50648310748350 X-SMAIL-UIID: BFA1DD3AD09A4203A069F6EAD55A4006-20241227-183015-1 From: Hillf Danton To: imran.f.khan@oracle.com Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Tejun Heo , john.stultz@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Query about timer wheel API Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 18:30:09 +0800 Message-ID: <20241227103011.497-1-hdanton@sina.com> In-Reply-To: <254db089-b5b8-4461-bd42-2cbfea7092b9@oracle.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 00:07:11 +1100 imran.f.khan@oracle.com > Sorry, I could not understand the last part of your comment. Do you mean that its a > known issue that should be addressed or do you mean that my use case of adding delayed_work > and/or timer to offlined CPUs is an invalid use case and should be fixed on the caller side ? > I mean, post a (rfc) patch fixing it.