From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: simplify tag allocation policy selection
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:58:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250106075824.GA17919@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106073520.GA17229@lst.de>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 08:35:20AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
> >> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template sil24_sht = {
> >> .can_queue = SIL24_MAX_CMDS,
> >> .sg_tablesize = SIL24_MAX_SGE,
> >> .dma_boundary = ATA_DMA_BOUNDARY,
> >> - .tag_alloc_policy = BLK_TAG_ALLOC_FIFO,
> >> + .tag_alloc_policy = SCSI_TAG_ALLOC_FIFO,
> >
> > do we actually need to set tag_alloc_policy to the default
> > (SCSI_TAG_ALLOC_FIFO)?
>
> libata uses weird inheritance where __ATA_BASE_SHT sets default fields
> that can then later be override, so this is indeed needed to set the
> field back to the original default after the previous assignment changed
> it. (Did I mentioned I hate this style of programming? :))
It turns out the clearning is not needed here, as the driver only
uses __ATA_BASE_SHT and not ATA_BASE_SHT (did I mentioned I hate this
templating?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-03 7:42 more BLK_MQ_F_* simplification Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: better split mq vs non-mq code in add_disk_fwnode Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: remove blk_mq_init_bitmaps Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-03 8:57 ` John Garry
2025-01-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: remove BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: simplify tag allocation policy selection Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-03 9:33 ` John Garry
2025-01-06 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-06 8:06 ` John Garry
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-06 8:35 more BLK_MQ_F_* simplification v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 8:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: simplify tag allocation policy selection Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 8:50 ` John Garry
2025-01-06 8:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 10:40 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250106075824.GA17919@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.