From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
Cc: "Mirsad Todorovac" <mtodorovac69@gmail.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Victor Skvortsov" <victor.skvortsov@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Xinhui Pan" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Carlos Maiolino" <cem@kernel.org>,
"Chandan Babu R" <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
"Dave Chinner" <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] xfs/libxfs: replace kmalloc() and memcpy() with kmemdup()
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:37:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250106193706.GG6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdnpycsyf37gbcp6yxx36pxgilothhdpajmtwle5pphjxshn6o@j5enpjtww3xx>
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:58:19PM +0100, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> On 2024-12-18 16:35:21, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:58:12PM +0100, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
> > > The source static analysis tool gave the following advice:
> > >
> > > ./fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.c:382:15-22: WARNING opportunity for kmemdup
> > >
> > > → 382 args->value = kmalloc(len,
> > > 383 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOLOCKDEP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> > > 384 if (!args->value)
> > > 385 return -ENOMEM;
> > > 386
> > > → 387 memcpy(args->value, name, len);
> > > 388 args->valuelen = len;
> > > 389 return -EEXIST;
> > >
> > > Replacing kmalloc() + memcpy() with kmemdump() doesn't change semantics.
> > > Original code works without fault, so this is not a bug fix but proposed improvement.
> >
> > I guess this is all right, but seeing as this code is shared with
> > userspace ("libxfs"), making this change will just add to the wrappers
> > that we have to have:
> >
> > void *kmemdup_noprof(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > void *p;
> >
> > p = kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof(len, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_);
> > if (p)
> > memcpy(p, src, len);
> > return p;
> > }
> >
> > Is this sufficiently better? That's a question for the kernel
> > maintainer (cem) and the userspace maintainer (andrey, now cc'd).
> >
> > --D
>
> There's still possibility to set wrong length in args->valuelen,
> which I suppose what this change tries to prevent.
>
> But otherwise wrapper looks good to me
Ok, proceed then.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> >
> > > Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/198928/
> > > Fixes: 94a69db2367ef ("xfs: use __GFP_NOLOCKDEP instead of GFP_NOFS")
> > > Fixes: 384f3ced07efd ("[XFS] Return case-insensitive match for dentry cache")
> > > Fixes: 2451337dd0439 ("xfs: global error sign conversion")
> > > Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > v1:
> > > initial version.
> > >
> > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.c
> > > index 202468223bf9..24251e42bdeb 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2.c
> > > @@ -379,12 +379,11 @@ xfs_dir_cilookup_result(
> > > !(args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_CILOOKUP))
> > > return -EEXIST;
> > >
> > > - args->value = kmalloc(len,
> > > + args->value = kmemdup(name, len,
> > > GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOLOCKDEP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> > > if (!args->value)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > - memcpy(args->value, name, len);
> > > args->valuelen = len;
> > > return -EEXIST;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> - Andrey
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 22:58 [PATCH v1 1/3] drm/admgpu: replace kmalloc() and memcpy() with kmemdup() Mirsad Todorovac
2024-12-17 22:58 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] xfs/libxfs: " Mirsad Todorovac
2024-12-19 0:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-29 12:58 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2025-01-06 19:37 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-09 8:49 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-01-14 10:28 ` Carlos Maiolino
2024-12-17 22:58 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] btrfs: " Mirsad Todorovac
2024-12-18 10:32 ` Mark Harmstone
2024-12-18 17:03 ` Mirsad Todorovac
2024-12-18 8:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] drm/admgpu: " Lazar, Lijo
2024-12-18 14:47 ` Alex Deucher
2025-01-14 10:30 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-01-14 14:27 ` Alex Deucher
2025-01-14 15:33 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250106193706.GG6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtodorovac69@gmail.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=victor.skvortsov@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.