From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Dohyun Kim <dohyunkim@google.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/22] locking: Move common qspinlock helpers to a private header
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 05:59:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107140004.2732830-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107140004.2732830-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Move qspinlock helper functions that encode, decode tail word, set and
clear the pending and locked bits, and other miscellaneous definitions
and macros to a private header. To this end, create a qspinlock.h header
file in kernel/locking. Subsequent commits will introduce a modified
qspinlock slow path function, thus moving shared code to a private
header will help minimize unnecessary code duplication.
Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 193 +----------------------------------
kernel/locking/qspinlock.h | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/locking/qspinlock.h
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 7d96bed718e4..af8d122bb649 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -25,8 +25,9 @@
#include <trace/events/lock.h>
/*
- * Include queued spinlock statistics code
+ * Include queued spinlock definitions and statistics code
*/
+#include "qspinlock.h"
#include "qspinlock_stat.h"
/*
@@ -67,36 +68,6 @@
*/
#include "mcs_spinlock.h"
-#define MAX_NODES 4
-
-/*
- * On 64-bit architectures, the mcs_spinlock structure will be 16 bytes in
- * size and four of them will fit nicely in one 64-byte cacheline. For
- * pvqspinlock, however, we need more space for extra data. To accommodate
- * that, we insert two more long words to pad it up to 32 bytes. IOW, only
- * two of them can fit in a cacheline in this case. That is OK as it is rare
- * to have more than 2 levels of slowpath nesting in actual use. We don't
- * want to penalize pvqspinlocks to optimize for a rare case in native
- * qspinlocks.
- */
-struct qnode {
- struct mcs_spinlock mcs;
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
- long reserved[2];
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
- * The pending bit spinning loop count.
- * This heuristic is used to limit the number of lockword accesses
- * made by atomic_cond_read_relaxed when waiting for the lock to
- * transition out of the "== _Q_PENDING_VAL" state. We don't spin
- * indefinitely because there's no guarantee that we'll make forward
- * progress.
- */
-#ifndef _Q_PENDING_LOOPS
-#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS 1
-#endif
/*
* Per-CPU queue node structures; we can never have more than 4 nested
@@ -106,161 +77,7 @@ struct qnode {
*
* PV doubles the storage and uses the second cacheline for PV state.
*/
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, qnodes[MAX_NODES]);
-
-/*
- * We must be able to distinguish between no-tail and the tail at 0:0,
- * therefore increment the cpu number by one.
- */
-
-static inline __pure u32 encode_tail(int cpu, int idx)
-{
- u32 tail;
-
- tail = (cpu + 1) << _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET;
- tail |= idx << _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET; /* assume < 4 */
-
- return tail;
-}
-
-static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail)
-{
- int cpu = (tail >> _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET) - 1;
- int idx = (tail & _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK) >> _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET;
-
- return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
-}
-
-static inline __pure
-struct mcs_spinlock *grab_mcs_node(struct mcs_spinlock *base, int idx)
-{
- return &((struct qnode *)base + idx)->mcs;
-}
-
-#define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK (_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
-
-#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
-/**
- * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
- * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- *
- * *,1,* -> *,0,*
- */
-static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0);
-}
-
-/**
- * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
- * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- *
- * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
- *
- * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used.
- */
-static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked_pending, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
-}
-
-/*
- * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
- * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- * @tail : The new queue tail code word
- * Return: The previous queue tail code word
- *
- * xchg(lock, tail), which heads an address dependency
- *
- * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
- */
-static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
-{
- /*
- * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that the
- * MCS node is properly initialized before updating the tail.
- */
- return (u32)xchg_relaxed(&lock->tail,
- tail >> _Q_TAIL_OFFSET) << _Q_TAIL_OFFSET;
-}
-
-#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
-
-/**
- * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
- * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- *
- * *,1,* -> *,0,*
- */
-static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
- atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
-}
-
-/**
- * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
- * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- *
- * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
- */
-static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
- atomic_add(-_Q_PENDING_VAL + _Q_LOCKED_VAL, &lock->val);
-}
-
-/**
- * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
- * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- * @tail : The new queue tail code word
- * Return: The previous queue tail code word
- *
- * xchg(lock, tail)
- *
- * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
- */
-static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
-{
- u32 old, new;
-
- old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
- do {
- new = (old & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
- /*
- * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that
- * the MCS node is properly initialized before updating the
- * tail.
- */
- } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &old, new));
-
- return old;
-}
-#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
-
-/**
- * queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire - fetch the whole lock value and set pending
- * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- * Return: The previous lock value
- *
- * *,*,* -> *,1,*
- */
-#ifndef queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire
-static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
- return atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
-}
-#endif
-
-/**
- * set_locked - Set the lock bit and own the lock
- * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
- *
- * *,*,0 -> *,0,1
- */
-static __always_inline void set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
-}
-
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, qnodes[_Q_MAX_NODES]);
/*
* Generate the native code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(); provide NOPs for
@@ -410,7 +227,7 @@ void __lockfunc queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
* any MCS node. This is not the most elegant solution, but is
* simple enough.
*/
- if (unlikely(idx >= MAX_NODES)) {
+ if (unlikely(idx >= _Q_MAX_NODES)) {
lockevent_inc(lock_no_node);
while (!queued_spin_trylock(lock))
cpu_relax();
@@ -465,7 +282,7 @@ void __lockfunc queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
* head of the waitqueue.
*/
if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
- prev = decode_tail(old);
+ prev = decode_tail(old, qnodes);
/* Link @node into the waitqueue. */
WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d4ceb9490365
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+/*
+ * Queued spinlock defines
+ *
+ * This file contains macro definitions and functions shared between different
+ * qspinlock slow path implementations.
+ */
+#ifndef __LINUX_QSPINLOCK_H
+#define __LINUX_QSPINLOCK_H
+
+#include <asm-generic/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
+#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
+#include <asm-generic/mcs_spinlock.h>
+
+#define _Q_MAX_NODES 4
+
+/*
+ * The pending bit spinning loop count.
+ * This heuristic is used to limit the number of lockword accesses
+ * made by atomic_cond_read_relaxed when waiting for the lock to
+ * transition out of the "== _Q_PENDING_VAL" state. We don't spin
+ * indefinitely because there's no guarantee that we'll make forward
+ * progress.
+ */
+#ifndef _Q_PENDING_LOOPS
+#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS 1
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * On 64-bit architectures, the mcs_spinlock structure will be 16 bytes in
+ * size and four of them will fit nicely in one 64-byte cacheline. For
+ * pvqspinlock, however, we need more space for extra data. To accommodate
+ * that, we insert two more long words to pad it up to 32 bytes. IOW, only
+ * two of them can fit in a cacheline in this case. That is OK as it is rare
+ * to have more than 2 levels of slowpath nesting in actual use. We don't
+ * want to penalize pvqspinlocks to optimize for a rare case in native
+ * qspinlocks.
+ */
+struct qnode {
+ struct mcs_spinlock mcs;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
+ long reserved[2];
+#endif
+};
+
+/*
+ * We must be able to distinguish between no-tail and the tail at 0:0,
+ * therefore increment the cpu number by one.
+ */
+
+static inline __pure u32 encode_tail(int cpu, int idx)
+{
+ u32 tail;
+
+ tail = (cpu + 1) << _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET;
+ tail |= idx << _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET; /* assume < 4 */
+
+ return tail;
+}
+
+static inline __pure struct mcs_spinlock *decode_tail(u32 tail, struct qnode *qnodes)
+{
+ int cpu = (tail >> _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET) - 1;
+ int idx = (tail & _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK) >> _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET;
+
+ return per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[idx].mcs, cpu);
+}
+
+static inline __pure
+struct mcs_spinlock *grab_mcs_node(struct mcs_spinlock *base, int idx)
+{
+ return &((struct qnode *)base + idx)->mcs;
+}
+
+#define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK (_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
+
+#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
+/**
+ * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,1,* -> *,0,*
+ */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0);
+}
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ *
+ * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used.
+ */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked_pending, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
+ * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ * @tail : The new queue tail code word
+ * Return: The previous queue tail code word
+ *
+ * xchg(lock, tail), which heads an address dependency
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
+ */
+static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
+{
+ /*
+ * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that the
+ * MCS node is properly initialized before updating the tail.
+ */
+ return (u32)xchg_relaxed(&lock->tail,
+ tail >> _Q_TAIL_OFFSET) << _Q_TAIL_OFFSET;
+}
+
+#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,1,* -> *,0,*
+ */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
+}
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ atomic_add(-_Q_PENDING_VAL + _Q_LOCKED_VAL, &lock->val);
+}
+
+/**
+ * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
+ * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ * @tail : The new queue tail code word
+ * Return: The previous queue tail code word
+ *
+ * xchg(lock, tail)
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
+ */
+static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
+{
+ u32 old, new;
+
+ old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+ do {
+ new = (old & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
+ /*
+ * We can use relaxed semantics since the caller ensures that
+ * the MCS node is properly initialized before updating the
+ * tail.
+ */
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &old, new));
+
+ return old;
+}
+#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
+
+/**
+ * queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire - fetch the whole lock value and set pending
+ * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ * Return: The previous lock value
+ *
+ * *,*,* -> *,1,*
+ */
+#ifndef queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire
+static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ return atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
+}
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * set_locked - Set the lock bit and own the lock
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ *
+ * *,*,0 -> *,0,1
+ */
+static __always_inline void set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
+}
+
+#endif /* __LINUX_QSPINLOCK_H */
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 13:59 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/22] locking: Move MCS struct definition to public header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/22] locking: Allow obtaining result of arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/22] locking: Copy out qspinlock.c to rqspinlock.c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/22] rqspinlock: Add rqspinlock.h header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/22] rqspinlock: Drop PV and virtualization support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/22] rqspinlock: Add support for timeouts Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 17:14 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] rqspinlock: Protect pending bit owners from stalls Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 17:14 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 19:54 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 2:19 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/22] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in queue " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 3:38 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/22] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in trylock fallback " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/22] rqspinlock: Add deadlock detection and recovery Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:06 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:19 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 0:32 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/22] rqspinlock: Add basic support for CONFIG_PARAVIRT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:27 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:32 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 0:48 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 2:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 2:58 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 3:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 3:46 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 3:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 3:58 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/22] rqspinlock: Add helper to print a splat on timeout or deadlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/22] rqspinlock: Add macros for rqspinlock usage Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:55 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 1:11 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 3:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 4:09 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/22] rqspinlock: Add locktorture support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] rqspinlock: Add entry to Makefile, MAINTAINERS Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/22] bpf: Convert hashtab.c to rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/22] bpf: Convert percpu_freelist.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 19/22] bpf: Convert lpm_trie.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 20/22] bpf: Introduce rqspinlock kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 10:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 10:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 10:44 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 21/22] bpf: Implement verifier support for rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 22/22] selftests/bpf: Add tests " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 23:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Linus Torvalds
2025-01-08 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-08 20:12 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-08 21:06 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 21:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-09 13:59 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 21:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 21:18 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107140004.2732830-3-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dohyunkim@google.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.