Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: fix phylib's dual eee_enabled

[Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>]

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:13:52 +0100
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:40:48PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:33:27 +0000
> > "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> >   
> > > phylib has two eee_enabled members. Some parts of the code are using
> > > phydev->eee_enabled, other parts are using phydev->eee_cfg.eee_enabled.
> > > This leads to incorrect behaviour as their state goes out of sync.
> > > ethtool --show-eee shows incorrect information, and --set-eee sometimes
> > > doesn't take effect.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by only having one eee_enabled member - that in eee_cfg.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 49168d1980e2 ("net: phy: Add phy_support_eee() indicating MAC support EEE")
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c    | 4 +---
> > >  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 4 ++--
> > >  include/linux/phy.h          | 2 --
> > >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >   
> > 
> > I observed a regression with this patch applied.
> > 
> > My system is based on a i.MX8MP soc with a TI DP83867 ethernet PHY and was
> > working with the kernel v6.12 release.  
> 
> Which ethernet interface is used on this system? FEC or stmmac?

It is the FEC (ethernet@30be0000).

> 
> Is it the correct PHY?
> https://www.ti.com/product/de-de/DP83867E

Yes, it is this PHY.

Best regards,
Hervé