All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netdevsim: add queue management API support
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:45:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107164529.27603de6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHS8izO3FWZ6Wgnf0jwHLo8xDczz1zmCq_ypXRAWijYuxUY0MA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:53:09 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote:
> > +/* Queue reset mode is controlled by ns->rq_reset_mode.
> > + * - normal - new NAPI new pool (old NAPI enabled when new added)  
> 
> Nit, probably not worth a respin: Normal seems to me to delete old
> napi after the new one is added and enabled.

Yes, the comment doesn't really focus on removal order, it's less
important. I may be missing your point..

> queue stop -> napi_disable(old)
> queue alloc -> netif_napi_add_config(new)
> queue start -> napi_enable(new)
> queue free -> netif_napi_del(old)

I think you have stop and alloc swapped here.

> > + * - mode 1 - allocate new pool (NAPI is only disabled / enabled)
> > + * - mode 2 - new NAPI new pool (old NAPI removed before new added)
> > + * - mode 3 - new NAPI new pool (old NAPI disabled when new added)
> > + */  
> 
> Which modes are 'correct' for a driver to implement? 2/3 is for
> testing only, as you note in the code, the add/del functions should
> really be called from alloc/free and not from queue_start. I assume
> modes normal and 1 are both correct implementations of the queue API
> and the driver gets to pick whether to reuse the napi instance or not?
> Asking because IIRC GVE implements mode 1, not what you consider
> 'normal'.

I can't think why any of them would be "incorrect" per se, but 2 and 3
are likely weird and unnatural. I thought mode 0 would simply be most
common, maybe I shouldn't have called it "normal". But because of all
the "modes" netdevsim implementation seemed too messy to be considered
a blueprint..

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07 16:08 [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net: make sure we retain NAPI ordering on netdev->napi_list Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] netdev: define NETDEV_INTERNAL Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] netdevsim: support NAPI config Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] netdevsim: allocate rqs individually Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] netdevsim: add queue alloc/free helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netdevsim: add queue management API support Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 22:53   ` Mina Almasry
2025-01-08  0:45     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] netdevsim: add debugfs-triggered queue reset Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 23:00   ` Mina Almasry
2025-01-08  0:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 16:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] selftests: net: test listing NAPI vs queue resets Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-09 14:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net: make sure we retain NAPI ordering on netdev->napi_list patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107164529.27603de6@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.