All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:12:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113181210.GG1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113141228.113714-5-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 03:12:08PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no good reason to pass a bool argument to wait for a buffer when
> the callers that want that can easily just wait themselves.
> 
> This means the wait moves out of the extra hold of the buffer, but as the
> callers of synchronous buffer I/O need to hold a reference anyway that is
> perfectly fine.
> 
> Because all async buffer submitters ignore the error return value, and
> the synchronous ones catch the error condition through b_error and
> xfs_buf_iowait this also means the new xfs_buf_submit doesn't have to
> return an error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Looks good to me now,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 5702cad9ccc9..5abada2b4a4a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -53,14 +53,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *xfs_buf_cache;
>   *	  b_lock (trylock due to inversion)
>   */
>  
> -static int __xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp, bool wait);
> -
> -static inline int
> -xfs_buf_submit(
> -	struct xfs_buf		*bp)
> -{
> -	return __xfs_buf_submit(bp, !(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC));
> -}
> +static void xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp);
> +static int xfs_buf_iowait(struct xfs_buf *bp);
>  
>  static inline bool xfs_buf_is_uncached(struct xfs_buf *bp)
>  {
> @@ -804,7 +798,10 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
>  	bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_WRITE | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD | XBF_DONE);
>  	bp->b_flags |= flags & (XBF_READ | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
>  
> -	return xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	if (flags & XBF_ASYNC)
> +		return 0;
> +	return xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -980,8 +977,8 @@ xfs_buf_read_uncached(
>  	bp->b_ops = ops;
>  
>  	xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> -	if (bp->b_error) {
> -		error = bp->b_error;
> +	error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> +	if (error) {
>  		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
>  		return error;
>  	}
> @@ -1483,7 +1480,8 @@ xfs_bwrite(
>  	bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ | _XBF_DELWRI_Q |
>  			 XBF_DONE);
>  
> -	error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
>  	if (error)
>  		xfs_force_shutdown(bp->b_mount, SHUTDOWN_META_IO_ERROR);
>  	return error;
> @@ -1698,13 +1696,10 @@ xfs_buf_iowait(
>   * safe to reference the buffer after a call to this function unless the caller
>   * holds an additional reference itself.
>   */
> -static int
> -__xfs_buf_submit(
> -	struct xfs_buf	*bp,
> -	bool		wait)
> +static void
> +xfs_buf_submit(
> +	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
>  {
> -	int		error = 0;
> -
>  	trace_xfs_buf_submit(bp, _RET_IP_);
>  
>  	ASSERT(!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q));
> @@ -1724,10 +1719,9 @@ __xfs_buf_submit(
>  	 * state here rather than mount state to avoid corrupting the log tail
>  	 * on shutdown.
>  	 */
> -	if (bp->b_mount->m_log &&
> -	    xlog_is_shutdown(bp->b_mount->m_log)) {
> +	if (bp->b_mount->m_log && xlog_is_shutdown(bp->b_mount->m_log)) {
>  		xfs_buf_ioend_fail(bp);
> -		return -EIO;
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1765,16 +1759,12 @@ __xfs_buf_submit(
>  			xfs_buf_ioend_async(bp);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (wait)
> -		error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Release the hold that keeps the buffer referenced for the entire
>  	 * I/O. Note that if the buffer is async, it is not safe to reference
>  	 * after this release.
>  	 */
>  	xfs_buf_rele(bp);
> -	return error;
>  }
>  
>  void *
> @@ -2323,7 +2313,7 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(
>  			bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
>  			xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
>  		}
> -		__xfs_buf_submit(bp, false);
> +		xfs_buf_submit(bp);
>  	}
>  	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>  
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-13 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-13 14:12 buffer cache cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfs: fix a double completion for buffers on in-memory targets Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 02/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment above xfs_buf_free_maps Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 03/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment about the b_pag field Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 18:12   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfs: simplify xfs_buf_delwri_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 07/15] xfs: move write verification out of _xfs_buf_ioapply Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 08/15] xfs: move in-memory buftarg handling " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 18:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 10/15] xfs: move invalidate_kernel_vmap_range to xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfs: remove the extra buffer reference in xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 12/15] xfs: always complete the buffer inline " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 13/15] xfs: simplify xfsaild_resubmit_item Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfs: move b_li_list based retry handling to common code Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfs: add a b_iodone callback to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-14  0:23 ` buffer cache cleanups v2 Dave Chinner
2025-01-16  9:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-06  9:54 buffer cache cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:02   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250113181210.GG1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.