From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 22:40:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113214010.GA512384@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4U5C3tHhDQ_pQTv@yuki.lan>
Hi Cyril, Wei,
> Hi!
> > +static void print_dbg_sig(int signum)
> > {
> > - fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s [start-signum] [end-signum]\n", argv0);
> > - return 1;
> > + char const *strsig = tst_strsig(signum);
> > +
> > + if (strstr(strsig, "???"))
> > + tst_res(TDEBUG, "[child] Sending kill(.., %d)", signum);
> > + else
> > + tst_res(TDEBUG, "[child] Sending kill(.., %s)", strsig);
> > }
> This works around the library defficiencies. I would rather see patch
> that changes the tst_strsig() return the number if we do not have a
> match.
Good point.
> This should work:
> diff --git a/lib/tests/tst_strsig.c b/lib/tests/tst_strsig.c
> index 9a5ca80aa..ed5be3f00 100644
> --- a/lib/tests/tst_strsig.c
> +++ b/lib/tests/tst_strsig.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> int main(void)
> {
> + fprintf(stderr, "0 = %s\n", tst_strsig(0));
> fprintf(stderr, "SIGKILL = %s\n", tst_strsig(SIGKILL));
> fprintf(stderr, "SIGALRM = %s\n", tst_strsig(SIGALRM));
> return 0;
> diff --git a/lib/tst_res.c b/lib/tst_res.c
> index 7c66d2f6c..90403bc67 100644
> --- a/lib/tst_res.c
> +++ b/lib/tst_res.c
> @@ -141,11 +141,14 @@ struct pair {
> #define PAIR(def) [def] = {.name = #def, .val = def},
> #define STRPAIR(key, value) [key] = {.name = value, .val = key},
> -#define PAIR_LOOKUP(pair_arr, idx) do { \
> - if (idx < 0 || (size_t)idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pair_arr) || \
> - pair_arr[idx].name == NULL) \
> - return "???"; \
> - return pair_arr[idx].name; \
> +#define PAIR_LOOKUP(pair_arr, idx) do { \
> + static char par_str_buf__[16]; \
> + if (idx < 0 || (size_t)idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pair_arr) || \
> + pair_arr[idx].name == NULL) { \
> + snprintf(par_str_buf__, sizeof(par_str_buf__), "%i", idx); \
> + return par_str_buf__; \
> + } \
> + return pair_arr[idx].name; \
> } while (0)
For this library change:
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
This makes sense. Could you please for speedup merge this library change,
so that Wei can base v6 on it?
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 11:22 [LTP] [PATCH v1 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2023-09-25 11:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2023-11-28 8:57 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-11-28 9:24 ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-25 11:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-11-28 9:31 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-11-28 9:51 ` Petr Vorel
2023-12-01 1:06 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-12-01 0:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2023-12-01 0:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2024-02-08 16:15 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2023-12-01 0:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2024-02-08 16:25 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2024-06-03 10:35 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2024-06-03 10:35 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2024-06-28 15:35 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-06-03 10:35 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2024-06-28 16:15 ` Cyril Hrubis
2024-12-17 6:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2024-12-17 6:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-08 13:39 ` Petr Vorel
2024-12-17 6:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-09 8:55 ` Petr Vorel
2025-01-13 8:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-13 8:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-13 16:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-13 21:40 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-01-14 9:25 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-13 8:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-14 12:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-14 12:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-14 13:05 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-14 12:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-14 14:32 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-14 14:32 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] ptrace05: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-16 16:44 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-14 14:32 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] ptrace06: " Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-16 16:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-17 10:40 ` Petr Vorel
2025-01-17 10:42 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-01-17 11:12 ` Petr Vorel
2025-01-20 4:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8 0/2] ptrace: Refactor Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-20 4:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8 1/2] ptrace06: Refactor the test using new LTP API Wei Gao via ltp
2025-01-20 13:35 ` Petr Vorel
2025-01-20 4:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8 2/2] ptrace06_child.c: Remove unused ptrace06_child.c Wei Gao via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250113214010.GA512384@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.