From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,yosryahmed@google.com,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,mhocko@kernel.org,hughd@google.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,chrisl@kernel.org,baohua@kernel.org,kasong@tencent.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-swap_cgroup-remove-global-swap-cgroup-lock.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 22:44:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114064451.9FD75C4CEDD@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/swap_cgroup: remove global swap cgroup lock
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-swap_cgroup-remove-global-swap-cgroup-lock.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Subject: mm/swap_cgroup: remove global swap cgroup lock
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:46:32 +0800
commit e9e58a4ec3b1 ("memcg: avoid use cmpxchg in swap cgroup
maintainance") replaced the cmpxchg/xchg with a global irq spinlock
because some archs doesn't support 2 bytes cmpxchg/xchg. Clearly this
won't scale well.
And as commented in swap_cgroup.c, this lock is not needed for map
synchronization.
Emulation of 2 bytes xchg with atomic cmpxchg isn't hard, so implement it
to get rid of this lock. Introduced two helpers for doing so and they can
be easily dropped if a generic 2 byte xchg is support.
Testing using 64G brd and build with build kernel with make -j96 in 1.5G
memory cgroup using 4k folios showed below improvement (6 test run):
Before this series:
Sys time: 10782.29 (stdev 42.353886)
Real time: 171.49 (stdev 0.595541)
After this commit:
Sys time: 9617.23 (stdev 37.764062), -10.81%
Real time: 159.65 (stdev 0.587388), -6.90%
With 64k folios and 2G memcg:
Before this series:
Sys time: 8176.94 (stdev 26.414712)
Real time: 141.98 (stdev 0.797382)
After this commit:
Sys time: 7358.98 (stdev 54.927593), -10.00%
Real time: 134.07 (stdev 0.757463), -5.57%
Sequential swapout of 8G 64k zero folios with madvise (24 test run):
Before this series:
5461409.12 us (stdev 183957.827084)
After this commit:
5420447.26 us (stdev 196419.240317)
Sequential swapin of 8G 4k zero folios (24 test run):
Before this series:
19736958.916667 us (stdev 189027.246676)
After this commit:
19662182.629630 us (stdev 172717.640614)
Performance is better or at least not worse for all tests above.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241218114633.85196-4-ryncsn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/swap_cgroup.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/swap_cgroup.c~mm-swap_cgroup-remove-global-swap-cgroup-lock
+++ a/mm/swap_cgroup.c
@@ -7,19 +7,20 @@
static DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_cgroup_mutex);
+/* Pack two cgroup id (short) of two entries in one swap_cgroup (atomic_t) */
+#define ID_PER_SC (sizeof(struct swap_cgroup) / sizeof(unsigned short))
+#define ID_SHIFT (BITS_PER_TYPE(unsigned short))
+#define ID_MASK (BIT(ID_SHIFT) - 1)
struct swap_cgroup {
- unsigned short id;
+ atomic_t ids;
};
struct swap_cgroup_ctrl {
struct swap_cgroup *map;
- spinlock_t lock;
};
static struct swap_cgroup_ctrl swap_cgroup_ctrl[MAX_SWAPFILES];
-#define SC_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(struct swap_cgroup))
-
/*
* SwapCgroup implements "lookup" and "exchange" operations.
* In typical usage, this swap_cgroup is accessed via memcg's charge/uncharge
@@ -30,19 +31,35 @@ static struct swap_cgroup_ctrl swap_cgro
* SwapCache(and its swp_entry) is under lock.
* - When called via swap_free(), there is no user of this entry and no race.
* Then, we don't need lock around "exchange".
- *
- * TODO: we can push these buffers out to HIGHMEM.
*/
-static struct swap_cgroup *lookup_swap_cgroup(swp_entry_t ent,
- struct swap_cgroup_ctrl **ctrlp)
+static unsigned short __swap_cgroup_id_lookup(struct swap_cgroup *map,
+ pgoff_t offset)
{
- pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(ent);
- struct swap_cgroup_ctrl *ctrl;
+ unsigned int shift = (offset % ID_PER_SC) * ID_SHIFT;
+ unsigned int old_ids = atomic_read(&map[offset / ID_PER_SC].ids);
- ctrl = &swap_cgroup_ctrl[swp_type(ent)];
- if (ctrlp)
- *ctrlp = ctrl;
- return &ctrl->map[offset];
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(ID_PER_SC));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct swap_cgroup) != sizeof(atomic_t));
+
+ return (old_ids >> shift) & ID_MASK;
+}
+
+static unsigned short __swap_cgroup_id_xchg(struct swap_cgroup *map,
+ pgoff_t offset,
+ unsigned short new_id)
+{
+ unsigned short old_id;
+ struct swap_cgroup *sc = &map[offset / ID_PER_SC];
+ unsigned int shift = (offset % ID_PER_SC) * ID_SHIFT;
+ unsigned int new_ids, old_ids = atomic_read(&sc->ids);
+
+ do {
+ old_id = (old_ids >> shift) & ID_MASK;
+ new_ids = (old_ids & ~(ID_MASK << shift));
+ new_ids |= ((unsigned int)new_id) << shift;
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&sc->ids, &old_ids, new_ids));
+
+ return old_id;
}
/**
@@ -58,21 +75,19 @@ unsigned short swap_cgroup_record(swp_en
unsigned int nr_ents)
{
struct swap_cgroup_ctrl *ctrl;
- struct swap_cgroup *sc;
- unsigned short old;
- unsigned long flags;
pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(ent);
pgoff_t end = offset + nr_ents;
+ unsigned short old, iter;
+ struct swap_cgroup *map;
- sc = lookup_swap_cgroup(ent, &ctrl);
+ ctrl = &swap_cgroup_ctrl[swp_type(ent)];
+ map = ctrl->map;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->lock, flags);
- old = sc->id;
- for (; offset < end; offset++, sc++) {
- VM_BUG_ON(sc->id != old);
- sc->id = id;
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->lock, flags);
+ old = __swap_cgroup_id_lookup(map, offset);
+ do {
+ iter = __swap_cgroup_id_xchg(map, offset, id);
+ VM_BUG_ON(iter != old);
+ } while (++offset != end);
return old;
}
@@ -85,9 +100,13 @@ unsigned short swap_cgroup_record(swp_en
*/
unsigned short lookup_swap_cgroup_id(swp_entry_t ent)
{
+ struct swap_cgroup_ctrl *ctrl;
+
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return 0;
- return lookup_swap_cgroup(ent, NULL)->id;
+
+ ctrl = &swap_cgroup_ctrl[swp_type(ent)];
+ return __swap_cgroup_id_lookup(ctrl->map, swp_offset(ent));
}
int swap_cgroup_swapon(int type, unsigned long max_pages)
@@ -98,14 +117,16 @@ int swap_cgroup_swapon(int type, unsigne
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return 0;
- map = vcalloc(max_pages, sizeof(struct swap_cgroup));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned short) * ID_PER_SC !=
+ sizeof(struct swap_cgroup));
+ map = vcalloc(DIV_ROUND_UP(max_pages, ID_PER_SC),
+ sizeof(struct swap_cgroup));
if (!map)
goto nomem;
ctrl = &swap_cgroup_ctrl[type];
mutex_lock(&swap_cgroup_mutex);
ctrl->map = map;
- spin_lock_init(&ctrl->lock);
mutex_unlock(&swap_cgroup_mutex);
return 0;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from kasong@tencent.com are
mm-swap-minor-clean-up-for-swap-entry-allocation.patch
mm-swap-fold-swap_info_get_cont-in-the-only-caller.patch
mm-swap-remove-old-allocation-path-for-hdd.patch
mm-swap-use-cluster-lock-for-hdd.patch
mm-swap-clean-up-device-availability-check.patch
mm-swap-clean-up-plist-removal-and-adding.patch
mm-swap-hold-a-reference-during-scan-and-cleanup-flag-usage.patch
mm-swap-use-an-enum-to-define-all-cluster-flags-and-wrap-flags-changes.patch
mm-swap-reduce-contention-on-device-lock.patch
mm-swap-simplify-percpu-cluster-updating.patch
mm-swap-introduce-a-helper-for-retrieving-cluster-from-offset.patch
mm-swap-use-a-global-swap-cluster-for-non-rotation-devices.patch
mm-swap_slots-remove-slot-cache-for-freeing-path.patch
reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114064451.9FD75C4CEDD@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.