From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1158:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq')
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:21:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202501141851.emYtMGL6-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
TO: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anand.ashok.dumbre@xilinx.com>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
CC: Manish Narani <manish.narani@xilinx.com>
Hi Anand,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: c45323b7560ec87c37c729b703c86ee65f136d75
commit: d5c70627a79455154f5f636096abe6fe57510605 iio: adc: Add Xilinx AMS driver
date: 3 years, 1 month ago
config: arm-randconfig-004-20241229 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250114/202501141851.emYtMGL6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 096551537b2a747a3387726ca618ceeb3950e9bc)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250114/202501141851.emYtMGL6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501141851.emYtMGL6-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1158:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1158 | AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCC_PSPLL, AMS_VCC_PSPLL0),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:259:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
259 | AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE(PL_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(_scan_index))), _addr, false)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:37: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:221:39: note: expanded from macro 'PL_SEQ'
221 | #define PL_SEQ(x) (AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:243:16: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
243 | .scan_index = _scan_index, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1159:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1159 | AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCC_PSBATT, AMS_VCC_PSPLL3),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:259:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
259 | AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE(PL_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(_scan_index))), _addr, false)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:37: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:221:39: note: expanded from macro 'PL_SEQ'
221 | #define PL_SEQ(x) (AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:243:16: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
243 | .scan_index = _scan_index, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1160:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1160 | AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCCINT, AMS_VCCINT),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:259:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
259 | AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE(PL_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(_scan_index))), _addr, false)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:37: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:221:39: note: expanded from macro 'PL_SEQ'
221 | #define PL_SEQ(x) (AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:243:16: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
243 | .scan_index = _scan_index, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1161:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1161 | AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCCBRAM, AMS_VCCBRAM),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:259:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
259 | AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE(PL_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(_scan_index))), _addr, false)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:37: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:221:39: note: expanded from macro 'PL_SEQ'
221 | #define PL_SEQ(x) (AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:243:16: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
243 | .scan_index = _scan_index, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1162:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1162 | AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCCAUX, AMS_VCCAUX),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:259:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
259 | AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE(PL_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(_scan_index))), _addr, false)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:37: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:221:39: note: expanded from macro 'PL_SEQ'
221 | #define PL_SEQ(x) (AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:243:16: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
243 | .scan_index = _scan_index, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1163:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1163 | AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_PSDDRPLL, AMS_PSDDRPLL),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:259:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE'
259 | AMS_CHAN_VOLTAGE(PL_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(AMS_SEQ(_scan_index))), _addr, false)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:34: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:219:37: note: expanded from macro 'AMS_SEQ'
219 | #define AMS_SEQ(x) (AMS_SEQ_MAX + (x))
vim +1158 drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c
1156
1157 static const struct iio_chan_spec ams_ctrl_channels[] = {
> 1158 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCC_PSPLL, AMS_VCC_PSPLL0),
1159 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCC_PSBATT, AMS_VCC_PSPLL3),
1160 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCCINT, AMS_VCCINT),
1161 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCCBRAM, AMS_VCCBRAM),
1162 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_VCCAUX, AMS_VCCAUX),
1163 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_PSDDRPLL, AMS_PSDDRPLL),
1164 AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE(AMS_SEQ_INTDDR, AMS_PSINTFPDDR),
1165 };
1166
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 10:21 kernel test robot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-08 11:10 drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:1158:2: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum ams_ps_pl_seq' and 'enum ams_seq') kernel test robot
2025-01-01 0:38 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202501141851.emYtMGL6-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.