From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cxl: Remove the CXL_DECODER_MIXED mistake
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:03:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250117100306.000077ae@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <173709423269.753996.17229236572128350685.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:10:32 -0800
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> CXL_DECODER_MIXED is a safety mechanism introduced for the case where
> platform firmware has programmed an endpoint decoder that straddles a
> DPA partition boundary. While the kernel is careful to only allocate DPA
> capacity within a single partition there is no guarantee that platform
> firmware, or anything that touched the device before the current kernel,
> gets that right.
>
> However, __cxl_dpa_reserve() will never get to the CXL_DECODER_MIXED
> designation because of the way it tracks partition boundaries. A
> request_resource() that spans ->ram_res and ->pmem_res fails with the
> following signature:
>
> __cxl_dpa_reserve: cxl_port endpoint15: decoder15.0: failed to reserve allocation
>
> CXL_DECODER_MIXED is dead defensive programming after the driver has
> already given up on the device. It has never offered any protection in
> practice, just delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 12 ------------
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> index 28edd5822486..be8556119d94 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> @@ -329,12 +329,12 @@ static int __cxl_dpa_reserve(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
>
> if (resource_contains(&cxlds->pmem_res, res))
> cxled->mode = CXL_DECODER_PMEM;
> - else if (resource_contains(&cxlds->ram_res, res))
> + if (resource_contains(&cxlds->ram_res, res))
Logic of removing the else? I assume there is 0 chance that both conditions
match, but doesn't this mean if the res is not in ram_res we always hit the next
else and print the warning?
> cxled->mode = CXL_DECODER_RAM;
> else {
> - dev_warn(dev, "decoder%d.%d: %pr mixed mode not supported\n",
> - port->id, cxled->cxld.id, cxled->dpa_res);
> - cxled->mode = CXL_DECODER_MIXED;
> + dev_warn(dev, "decoder%d.%d: %pr does not map any partition\n",
> + port->id, cxled->cxld.id, res);
> + cxled->mode = CXL_DECODER_NONE;
> }
>
> port->hdm_end++;
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index f6015f24ad38..0fb8d70fa3e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -379,7 +379,6 @@ enum cxl_decoder_mode {
> CXL_DECODER_NONE,
> CXL_DECODER_RAM,
> CXL_DECODER_PMEM,
> - CXL_DECODER_MIXED,
> CXL_DECODER_DEAD,
> };
>
> @@ -389,10 +388,9 @@ static inline const char *cxl_decoder_mode_name(enum cxl_decoder_mode mode)
> [CXL_DECODER_NONE] = "none",
> [CXL_DECODER_RAM] = "ram",
> [CXL_DECODER_PMEM] = "pmem",
> - [CXL_DECODER_MIXED] = "mixed",
> };
>
> - if (mode >= CXL_DECODER_NONE && mode <= CXL_DECODER_MIXED)
> + if (mode >= CXL_DECODER_NONE && mode <= CXL_DECODER_PMEM)
Maybe just < DEAD is simpler?
> return names[mode];
> return "mixed";
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 6:10 [PATCH 0/4] cxl: DPA partition metadata is a mess Dan Williams
2025-01-17 6:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] cxl: Remove the CXL_DECODER_MIXED mistake Dan Williams
2025-01-17 10:03 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-01-17 17:47 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 10:24 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-01-17 17:54 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 18:45 ` Ira Weiny
2025-01-17 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] cxl: Introduce to_{ram,pmem}_{res,perf}() helpers Dan Williams
2025-01-17 10:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-17 10:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-17 17:55 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 13:33 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-01-17 20:47 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 6:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] cxl: Introduce 'struct cxl_dpa_partition' and 'struct cxl_range_info' Dan Williams
2025-01-17 10:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-17 13:38 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-01-17 18:23 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 20:32 ` Ira Weiny
2025-01-20 12:24 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-01-31 23:54 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 15:58 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-01-17 22:52 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 20:42 ` Ira Weiny
2025-01-17 22:08 ` Ira Weiny
2025-01-31 23:39 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 6:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] cxl: Make cxl_dpa_alloc() DPA partition number agnostic Dan Williams
2025-01-17 11:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-01-17 18:37 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-17 15:42 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-01-17 20:57 ` Dan Williams
2025-01-20 12:39 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-02-01 0:08 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250117100306.000077ae@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.