From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] seccomp: remove the 'sd' argument from __seccomp_filter()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:45:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250120134505.GA21290@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250120134409.GA21241@redhat.com>
After the previous change 'sd' is always NULL.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index c29dfe82139e..75e293d3c1a1 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1213,13 +1213,12 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
return -1;
}
-static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
- const bool recheck_after_trace)
+static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
u32 filter_ret, action;
+ struct seccomp_data sd;
struct seccomp_filter *match = NULL;
int data;
- struct seccomp_data sd_local;
/*
* Make sure that any changes to mode from another thread have
@@ -1227,12 +1226,9 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
*/
smp_rmb();
- if (!sd) {
- populate_seccomp_data(&sd_local);
- sd = &sd_local;
- }
+ populate_seccomp_data(&sd);
- filter_ret = seccomp_run_filters(sd, &match);
+ filter_ret = seccomp_run_filters(&sd, &match);
data = filter_ret & SECCOMP_RET_DATA;
action = filter_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL;
@@ -1290,13 +1286,13 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
* a reload of all registers. This does not goto skip since
* a skip would have already been reported.
*/
- if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, true))
+ if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, true))
return -1;
return 0;
case SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF:
- if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, match, sd))
+ if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, match, &sd))
goto skip;
return 0;
@@ -1338,8 +1334,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
return -1;
}
#else
-static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
- const bool recheck_after_trace)
+static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
BUG();
@@ -1363,7 +1358,7 @@ int __secure_computing(void)
__secure_computing_strict(this_syscall); /* may call do_exit */
return 0;
case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER:
- return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, false);
+ return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, false);
/* Surviving SECCOMP_RET_KILL_* must be proactively impossible. */
case SECCOMP_MODE_DEAD:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-20 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-20 13:44 [PATCH 0/4] seccomp: remove the 'sd' argument from __secure_computing() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] seccomp/mips: change syscall_trace_enter() to use secure_computing() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-20 21:48 ` Kees Cook
2025-01-23 14:33 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-01-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] seccomp: kill the dead code in the !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER version of __secure_computing() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-20 21:54 ` Kees Cook
2025-01-21 14:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-27 19:17 ` Kees Cook
2025-01-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] seccomp: remove the 'sd' argument from __secure_computing() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-20 21:55 ` Kees Cook
2025-01-20 13:45 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-01-20 22:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] seccomp: remove the 'sd' argument from __seccomp_filter() Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250120134505.GA21290@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.