All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Error in generic/397 test script?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:53:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250120175343.GC2268@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250120174627.GB2268@sol.localdomain>

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 09:46:29AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 05:41:40PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > It would be enlightening to understand what the issue was here.  Did you
> > > explicitly disable these options, overriding the imply, without providing a
> > > replacement?  Or was this another issue specific to unmerged kernel patches?
> > 
> > I enabled CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION in addition to the options I normally use, but
> > didn't realise I needed to enable CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS as well.
> > 
> > David
> > 
> 
> So you had an explicit '# CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS is not set' somewhere in your
> kconfig that overrode the imply, right?
> 
> Wondering if the following commit should maybe be reconsidered:
> 
>     commit a0fc20333ee4bac1147c4cf75dea098c26671a2f
>     Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>     Date:   Wed Apr 21 09:55:10 2021 +0200
> 
>         fscrypt: relax Kconfig dependencies for crypto API algorithms
>         
>         Even if FS encryption has strict functional dependencies on various
>         crypto algorithms and chaining modes. those dependencies could potentially
>         be satisified by other implementations than the generic ones, and no link
>         time dependency exists on the 'depends on' claused defined by
>         CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS.
>         
>         So let's relax these clauses to 'imply', so that the default behavior
>         is still to pull in those generic algorithms, but in a way that permits
>         them to be disabled again in Kconfig.
>         
>         Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>         Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>         Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

By the way, CRYPTO_XTS is basically useless.  E.g. on x86_64 you really want
CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL.  I should probably throw in a selection of that (similar to
what CONFIG_WIREGUARD does where it selects optimized code for each arch),
though I've been hoping for this to be properly solved at the crypto API level.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-20 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-20 12:32 Error in generic/397 test script? David Howells
2025-01-20 14:20 ` David Howells
2025-01-20 15:43   ` David Howells
2025-01-20 17:25     ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:41       ` David Howells
2025-01-20 17:46         ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:53           ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-01-20 17:19   ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:17 ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:26   ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250120175343.GC2268@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.