From: Raj Vishwanathan <raj.vishwanathan@gmail.com>
To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] New configuration CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:55:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250121225537.761896-1-Raj.Vishwanathan@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250119200448.662074-1-Raj.Vishwanathan@gmail.com>
We add a new configuration CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT as an int
If it is set to 0 or not defined, we will continue with the previous
defintion of allocating pointer size chunks. Otherwise we will use the
chacheline size of 64.
We have the option of increasing the scratch allocation alignment to 64 bytes
as the cache line size, to avoid two atomic variables from
the same cache line that may cause livelock on some platforms.
---
Update: Agreeing with the reviewer's comment about not stressing 64 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Raj Vishwanathan <Raj.Vishwanathan@gmail.com>
---
lib/sbi/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
lib/sbi/sbi_scratch.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sbi/Kconfig b/lib/sbi/Kconfig
index c6cc04b..5f7eb70 100644
--- a/lib/sbi/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/sbi/Kconfig
@@ -69,4 +69,11 @@ config SBI_ECALL_SSE
config SBI_ECALL_MPXY
bool "MPXY extension"
default y
+config SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT
+ int "Scratch allocation alignment"
+ default 0
+ help
+ We provide the option to customize the alignment to allocate from
+ the extra space in sbi_scratch. Leave it 0 for default behaviour.
+
endmenu
diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_scratch.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_scratch.c
index ccbbc68..3fd7b4b 100644
--- a/lib/sbi/sbi_scratch.c
+++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_scratch.c
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@
#include <sbi/sbi_scratch.h>
#include <sbi/sbi_string.h>
+#if !defined(CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT) || (CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT==0)
+#define SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT __SIZEOF_POINTER__
+#else
+#define SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT
+#endif
+
+
u32 last_hartindex_having_scratch = 0;
u32 hartindex_to_hartid_table[SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS + 1] = { -1U };
struct sbi_scratch *hartindex_to_scratch_table[SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS + 1] = { 0 };
@@ -70,8 +77,15 @@ unsigned long sbi_scratch_alloc_offset(unsigned long size)
if (!size)
return 0;
- size += __SIZEOF_POINTER__ - 1;
- size &= ~((unsigned long)__SIZEOF_POINTER__ - 1);
+ /*
+ * We do the scratch allocation on the basis of a user configuration.
+ * We have the option of increasing the scratch allocation alignment
+ * to the cache line size (64 bytes) to avoid two atomic variables
+ * from the same cache line that may cause livelock on some platforms.
+ */
+
+ size += SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT- 1;
+ size &= ~((unsigned long)SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT - 1);
spin_lock(&extra_lock);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-21 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 0:34 [PATCH] Align the scratch allocation to 64 bytes Chao-ying Fu
2025-01-10 4:15 ` Xiang W
2025-01-10 2:36 ` Chao-ying Fu
2025-01-19 20:04 ` [PATCH v2] We add a new configuration CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT as an int Raj Vishwanathan
2025-01-20 3:58 ` Xiang W
2025-01-20 18:56 ` [EXTERNAL]Re: " Raj Vishwanathan
2025-01-21 1:46 ` [PATCH v3] New configuration CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT Raj Vishwanathan
2025-01-21 3:21 ` Xiang W
2025-01-21 22:55 ` Raj Vishwanathan [this message]
2025-01-24 23:26 ` Raj Vishwanathan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-15 23:46 [PATCH v2] Work with hartid equal to or greater than SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS Raj Vishwanathan
2025-01-27 20:20 ` [PATCH v3] New configuration CONFIG_SBI_SCRATCH_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT Raj Vishwanathan
2025-01-28 4:36 ` Xiang W
2025-02-11 4:45 ` Anup Patel
2025-03-05 0:31 ` Raj Vishwanathan
2025-03-05 2:01 ` Samuel Holland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250121225537.761896-1-Raj.Vishwanathan@gmail.com \
--to=raj.vishwanathan@gmail.com \
--cc=opensbi@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.