From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] selftests/nolibc: always keep test kernel configuration up to date
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 23:14:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250122221411.GA6099@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feb6f196-a6f0-4a42-9b04-6d0083629d40@t-8ch.de>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 08:00:28PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi Willy!
>
> On 2025-01-22 19:52:06+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > @@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ test_arch() {
> > > exit 1
> > > esac
> > > printf '%-15s' "$arch:"
> > > - swallow_output "${MAKE[@]}" CFLAGS_EXTRA="$CFLAGS_EXTRA" "$test_target" V=1
> > > + swallow_output "${MAKE[@]}" CFLAGS_EXTRA="$CFLAGS_EXTRA" defconfig "$test_target" V=1
> >
> > Just a question, are you certain that dependencies between $test_target
> > and defconfig are always properly handled ? I'm asking because "make -j"
> > is something valid, and we wouldn't want defconfig to run in parallel
> > with test_target.
>
> "make -j" is not only valid but used by run-tests.sh always.
> The sequencing is explicitly enforced in patch 4.
I learned something today, I didn't know about order-only rules.
> > For real sequencing (and making sure targets run in the
> > correct order), I normally prefer to run them one at a time. Here you could
> > simply prepend the defconfig line before the original one and get these
> > guarantees (and also make them explicit). That's also less edit when
> > copy-pasting from the terminal to the shell when trying to debug.
>
> Sounds fine to me, too.
> That would remove the need for patch 4, but I'd like to keep it anyways.
Agreed!
Willy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 18:41 [PATCH 0/5] selftests/nolibc: test kernel configuration cleanups Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/nolibc: drop custom EXTRACONFIG functionality Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] selftests/nolibc: drop call to prepare target Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/nolibc: drop call to mrproper target Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/nolibc: execute defconfig before other targets Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 18:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/nolibc: always keep test kernel configuration up to date Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 18:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-01-22 19:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-01-22 22:14 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250122221411.GA6099@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.