From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CF24C02181 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2083C557C for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:02:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2983C1B7F for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:02:03 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-7.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D0A2504C7 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:02:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED571F391; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:02:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737712920; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=G2FVNu1ZhKf1Xiuoek8qdmpNSjJXUYQRZ1jqaw3a3oQ=; b=pu7RYuluSnxvhXHqXs7tps9PtkGVnMd2sDiF1LZmB3mXwrt8YVCWpFZkoAPOKg5CDqknDZ y7FYoLtYTI18dTRl6Lj40mzQ++yhCLNqj9fM9RRsUcuhZ+Y/jegx+CG2rIsA8tw/9HnzBM CVAFCcMzdpLD6OUiXVMdxMRwCDygfKc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737712920; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=G2FVNu1ZhKf1Xiuoek8qdmpNSjJXUYQRZ1jqaw3a3oQ=; b=dChnM/fPbKqn1SCx/qZuofEb4OhGZBBkgDylzsO8vAh+pdB5gwjc/3gYb375ikAtELTA28 975yHvoLMNWipLDA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737712920; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=G2FVNu1ZhKf1Xiuoek8qdmpNSjJXUYQRZ1jqaw3a3oQ=; b=pu7RYuluSnxvhXHqXs7tps9PtkGVnMd2sDiF1LZmB3mXwrt8YVCWpFZkoAPOKg5CDqknDZ y7FYoLtYTI18dTRl6Lj40mzQ++yhCLNqj9fM9RRsUcuhZ+Y/jegx+CG2rIsA8tw/9HnzBM CVAFCcMzdpLD6OUiXVMdxMRwCDygfKc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737712920; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=G2FVNu1ZhKf1Xiuoek8qdmpNSjJXUYQRZ1jqaw3a3oQ=; b=dChnM/fPbKqn1SCx/qZuofEb4OhGZBBkgDylzsO8vAh+pdB5gwjc/3gYb375ikAtELTA28 975yHvoLMNWipLDA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5ED13999; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 9qVAFRhlk2fHOgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:02:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:01:51 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Amir Goldstein Message-ID: <20250124100151.GD159953@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [LTP] Split some fanotify tests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Jan Kara , ltp@lists.linux.it, Martin Doucha Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Amir, FYI we were thinking with Martin about splitting some of the fanotify tests. Why? Some of the fanotify tests are hard to review (e.g. fanotify{10,13,14}.c,), because the have a lot of results. Also other problem is that some enterprise kernels does not backport minor fixes and the usual approach is to whitelist the issue based on exit code. But this cannot be done on the test which has many results. We could workaround it with tst_kvercmp2(), but that's kind of a last result. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp