From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
quanglex97@gmail.com, mincho@theori.io,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net 2/4] Add test case to check for pfifo_tail_enqueue() behaviour when limit == 0
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:54:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250127175453.GG5024@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z5Wxh/oUF2meTEBS@pop-os.localdomain>
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 07:52:39PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 07:20:42PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:37:43AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:07:38PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > > From: Quang Le <quanglex97@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > When limit == 0, pfifo_tail_enqueue() must drop new packet and
> > > > increase dropped packets count of scheduler.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Quang Le <quanglex97@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> > >
> > > Hi Cong, all,
> > >
> > > This test is reporting "not ok" in the Netdev CI.
> > >
> > > # not ok 577 d774 - Check pfifo_head_drop qdisc enqueue behaviour when limit == 0
> > > # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output:
> > > # qdisc pfifo_head_drop 1: root refcnt 2 limit 0p
> > > # Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> > > # backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >
> > Oops... It worked on my side, let me take a look.
> >
>
> I ran it again for multiple times, it still worked for me:
>
> 1..16
> ok 1 a519 - Add bfifo qdisc with system default parameters on egress
> ok 2 585c - Add pfifo qdisc with system default parameters on egress
> ok 3 a86e - Add bfifo qdisc with system default parameters on egress with handle of maximum value
> ok 4 9ac8 - Add bfifo qdisc on egress with queue size of 3000 bytes
> ok 5 f4e6 - Add pfifo qdisc on egress with queue size of 3000 packets
> ok 6 b1b1 - Add bfifo qdisc with system default parameters on egress with invalid handle exceeding maximum value
> ok 7 8d5e - Add bfifo qdisc on egress with unsupported argument
> ok 8 7787 - Add pfifo qdisc on egress with unsupported argument
> ok 9 c4b6 - Replace bfifo qdisc on egress with new queue size
> ok 10 3df6 - Replace pfifo qdisc on egress with new queue size
> ok 11 7a67 - Add bfifo qdisc on egress with queue size in invalid format
> ok 12 1298 - Add duplicate bfifo qdisc on egress
> ok 13 45a0 - Delete nonexistent bfifo qdisc
> ok 14 972b - Add prio qdisc on egress with invalid format for handles
> ok 15 4d39 - Delete bfifo qdisc twice
> ok 16 d774 - Check pfifo_head_drop qdisc enqueue behaviour when limit == 0
>
> Could you provide a link for me to check?
I'll send you some links off-list.
>
> Just in case, please make sure patch 1/4 is applied before this test,
> otherwise packets would not be dropped.
Yes, I am pretty sure that is the case.
>
> Meanwhile, I do need to update this patch anyway, because it hardcoded
> dummy2...
>
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-27 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 6:07 [Patch net 0/4] net_sched: two security bug fixes and test cases Cong Wang
2025-01-24 6:07 ` [Patch net 1/4] pfifo_tail_enqueue: Drop new packet when sch->limit == 0 Cong Wang
2025-01-30 11:17 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-01-31 21:53 ` Cong Wang
2025-01-24 6:07 ` [Patch net 2/4] Add test case to check for pfifo_tail_enqueue() behaviour when limit " Cong Wang
2025-01-24 11:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-26 3:20 ` Cong Wang
2025-01-26 3:52 ` Cong Wang
2025-01-27 17:54 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-01-24 6:07 ` [Patch net 3/4] netem: update sch->q.qlen before qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog() Cong Wang
2025-01-24 6:07 ` [Patch net 4/4] selftests/tc-testing: add tests for qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250127175453.GG5024@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=mincho@theori.io \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quanglex97@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.