From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <horms@kernel.org>, <krisman@suse.de>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<lmb@isovalent.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <tom@herbertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] udp4: Rescan udp hash chains if cross-linked.
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:26:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250127212611.74681753@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250127203304.65501-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:33:04 -0800
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> wrote:
> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 19:40:23 +0000
> > udp_lib_rehash() can get called at any time and will move a
> > socket to a different hash2 chain.
> > This can cause udp4_lib_lookup2() (processing incoming UDP) to
> > fail to find a socket and an ICMP port unreachable be sent.
> >
> > Prior to ca065d0cf80fa the lookup used 'hlist_nulls' and checked
> > that the 'end if list' marker was on the correct list.
>
> I think we should use hlist_nulls for hash2 as hash4.
From what I remember when I first wrote this patch (mid 2023) using
hlist_nulls doesn't make much difference.
The code just did a rescan when the 'wrong NULL' was found rather than
when the last item wasn't on the starting hash chain.
ISTR it was removed to simplify other code paths.
>
> ---8<---
> commit dab78a1745ab3c6001e1e4d50a9d09efef8e260d
> Author: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
> Date: Thu Nov 14 18:52:05 2024 +0800
>
> net/udp: Add 4-tuple hash list basis
> ...
> hash4 uses hlist_nulls to avoid moving wrongly onto another hlist due to
> concurrent rehash, because rehash() can happen with lookup().
> ---8<---
>
>
> Also, Fixes: tag is missing in both patches.
Semi-deliberate to stop it being immediately backported.
While I think we have a system/test that fails it is running Ubuntu on a Dell
server and I don't think the raid controller driver is in the main kernel tree.
(We're definitely seeing unexpected ICMP on localhost - hard to get otherwise.)
David
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > net/ipv4/udp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > index 86d282618515..a8e2b431d348 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > @@ -425,16 +425,21 @@ static struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup2(const struct net *net,
> > __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
> > __be32 daddr, unsigned int hnum,
> > int dif, int sdif,
> > + unsigned int hash2, unsigned int mask,
> > struct udp_hslot *hslot2,
> > struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > + unsigned int hash2_rescan;
> > struct sock *sk, *result;
> > int score, badness;
> > bool need_rescore;
> >
> > +rescan:
> > + hash2_rescan = hash2;
> > result = NULL;
> > badness = 0;
> > udp_portaddr_for_each_entry_rcu(sk, &hslot2->head) {
> > + hash2_rescan = udp_sk(sk)->udp_portaddr_hash;
> > need_rescore = false;
> > rescore:
> > score = compute_score(need_rescore ? result : sk, net, saddr,
> > @@ -475,6 +480,16 @@ static struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup2(const struct net *net,
> > goto rescore;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + /* udp sockets can get moved to a different hash chain.
> > + * If the chains have got crossed then rescan.
> > + */
>
> nit: trailing spaces here ^^^^^^^^
>
>
> > + if ((hash2_rescan ^ hash2) & mask) {
> > + /* Ensure hslot2->head is reread */
> > + barrier();
> > + goto rescan;
> > + }
> > +
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -654,7 +669,7 @@ struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup(const struct net *net, __be32 saddr,
> > /* Lookup connected or non-wildcard socket */
> > result = udp4_lib_lookup2(net, saddr, sport,
> > daddr, hnum, dif, sdif,
> > - hslot2, skb);
> > + hash2, udptable->mask, hslot2, skb);
> > if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(result) && result->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
> > goto done;
> >
> > @@ -680,7 +695,7 @@ struct sock *__udp4_lib_lookup(const struct net *net, __be32 saddr,
> >
> > result = udp4_lib_lookup2(net, saddr, sport,
> > htonl(INADDR_ANY), hnum, dif, sdif,
> > - hslot2, skb);
> > + hash2, udptable->mask, hslot2, skb);
> > done:
> > if (IS_ERR(result))
> > return NULL;
> > --
> > 2.39.5
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-27 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-27 19:40 [PATCH net 0/2] udplookup: Rescan udp hash chains if cross-linked David Laight
2025-01-27 19:40 ` [PATCH net 1/2] udp4: " David Laight
2025-01-27 19:40 ` [PATCH net 2/2] udp6: " David Laight
2025-01-27 20:33 ` [PATCH net 1/2] udp4: " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-27 21:26 ` David Laight [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250127212611.74681753@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@isovalent.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.