From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk()
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:53:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250128085336.GA25760@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250122165829.11603-3-hare@kernel.org>
> + * Generate a PSK for TLS as specified in NVMe base specification, section 8.13.5.9:
Please fix your comment to stay in 80 characters. The line wrapping
here makes the text almost unreadable.
> +int nvme_auth_generate_psk(u8 hmac_id, u8 *skey, size_t skey_len,
> + u8 *c1, u8 *c2, size_t hash_len, u8 **ret_psk,size_t *ret_len)
Missing whitespace before the last size_t.
> +{
> + struct crypto_shash *tfm;
> + struct shash_desc *shash;
> + u8 *psk;
> + const char *hmac_name;
> + int ret, psk_len;
> +
> + if (!c1 || !c2) {
> + pr_warn("%s: invalid parameter\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
No a very useful error message. Given that this is a violation of
the API contract either a WARN_ON_ONCE or just letting the crypto
algorithm fail should be fine.
> + tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hmac_name, 0, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(tfm))
> + return PTR_ERR(tfm);
> +
> + psk_len = crypto_shash_digestsize(tfm);
> + psk = kzalloc(psk_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!psk) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_tfm;
> + }
> +
> + shash = kmalloc(sizeof(struct shash_desc) +
> + crypto_shash_descsize(tfm),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!shash) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_psk;
> + }
Is there a good reason this can't use SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 16:58 [PATCHv14 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 01/10] crypto,fs: Separate out hkdf_extract() and hkdf_expand() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-28 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 03/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_digest() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 04/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_derive_tls_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 13:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-04 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] nvme-keyring: add nvme_tls_psk_refresh() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 13:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 06/10] nvme: always include <linux/key.h> Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 13:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] nvme-tcp: request secure channel concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 15:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-03 14:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 08/10] nvme-fabrics: reset admin connection for secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 09/10] nvmet-tcp: support secure channel concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 14:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 10/10] nvmet: add tls_concat and tls_key debugfs entries Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-23 22:13 ` [PATCHv14 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Sagi Grimberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-24 12:38 [PATCHv15 " Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-24 12:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-03 11:02 [PATCHv13 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-03 11:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-02 14:29 [PATCHv12 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 02/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk() Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250128085336.GA25760@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.