From: Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot <bugbot@kernel.org>
To: anna@kernel.org, trondmy@kernel.org, cel@kernel.org,
jlayton@kernel.org, aglo@umich.edu, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: warning in nfsd4_cb_done
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:20:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250130-b219737c5-407a49d87e0d@bugzilla.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250130-b219737c4-ed5364ddf3cd@bugzilla.kernel.org>
Chuck Lever writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla:
(In reply to Chuck Lever from comment #4)
> (In reply to Bugspray Bot from comment #3)
> > Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> replies to comment #1:
> >
> > > First issue is the explicit use of NFS4ERR_BAD_XDR in the CB_GETATTR
> reply
> > > decoder. Should be EIO instead.
> > >
> > > Second issue is the CB_GETATTR reply decoder does not seem capable of
> > > handling a non-zero status code in the reply.
> > >
> > > Third issue is whether NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE means the server requested a
> > > CB_GETATTR for the wrong file, or if it is an expected situation.
> >
> > Isn't this because 6.12.x is still missing the patch "NFSD: fix
> > decoding in nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_getattr" that just went into 6.14?
>
> Yes, second and third issues are addressed by 1b3e26a5ccbf ("NFSD: fix
> decoding in nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_getattr").
>
> The first issue has not yet been addressed upstream.
The first issue isn't a big deal, though. Applying 1b3e26a5ccbf should address this bug.
View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219737#c5
You can reply to this message to join the discussion.
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 14:05 warning in nfsd4_cb_done rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 14:10 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:08 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-01-30 15:20 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 15:20 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot [this message]
2025-01-30 15:55 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-01-30 14:20 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-04 13:30 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-04 13:30 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 15:03 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2025-02-10 16:35 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 15:45 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-10 16:45 ` Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-24 11:55 ` rik.theys via Bugspray Bot
2025-02-24 12:20 ` Jeff Layton via Bugspray Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250130-b219737c5-407a49d87e0d@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--to=bugbot@kernel.org \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.