From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] cxl: Add FWCTL support to the CXL memdev driver
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 12:42:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203124232.00003dd2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250201004459.466499-9-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:42:01 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> Add fwctl support code to allow sending of CXL feature commands from
> userspace through as ioctls via FWCTL. Provide initial setup bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Associate FWCTL with the 'cxl_memdev' through the memdev driver. (Dan)
> - I'm leaving Jonathan's tag off to get this looked at again.
Wise move ;) Comments inline. Mind you I'm rereading the lot
as been off a few days and this is all gone from my head!
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/features.c b/drivers/cxl/features.c
> index 82598a409acc..2dcfefdfa6b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/features.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/features.c
>
> +/* The __weak symbol gets replaced by FWCTL allocation function in fwctl.c */
> +struct cxl_features_state * __weak devm_cxlfs_allocate(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> + struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs =
> + devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cxlfs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!cxlfs)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
This is returning an error pointer, but the DEFINE FREE assumes
NULL I think for the failed to allocate case. Or just return NULL
and don't modify that.
> +
> + cxlfs->cxlmd = cxlmd;
> +
> + return cxlfs;
> +}
> +
> +/* The __weak symbol gets replaced by FWCTL free function in fwctl.c */
> +void __weak devm_cxlfs_free(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> +{
> + devm_kfree(&cxlmd->dev, cxlmd->cxlfs);
> + cxlmd->cxlfs = NULL;
This missing clear of hanging pointer I mentioned back in earlier patch.
> +}
> +
> static void cxl_cxlfs_free(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs)
> {
> - struct device *dev = &cxlfs->cxlmd->dev;
> -
> - devm_kfree(dev, cxlfs);
> + devm_cxlfs_free(cxlfs->cxlmd);
> }
>
> DEFINE_FREE(free_cxlfs, struct cxl_features_state *, if (_T) cxl_cxlfs_free(_T))
> @@ -185,15 +208,13 @@ DEFINE_FREE(free_cxlfs, struct cxl_features_state *, if (_T) cxl_cxlfs_free(_T))
As above, needs to be if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) I think.
> */
> int devm_cxl_add_features(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> {
> - struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> int rc;
>
> struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs __free(free_cxlfs) =
> - devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cxlfs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + devm_cxlfs_allocate(cxlmd);
As per early comments. I'd drag this much earlier in the series
though make only add the __weak markings and comments in this
patch. That will reduce churn.
> if (!cxlfs)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - cxlfs->cxlmd = cxlmd;
> enumerate_feature_cmds(cxlmd, cxlfs);
> rc = get_supported_features(cxlmd, cxlfs);
> if (rc)
> @@ -204,3 +225,5 @@ int devm_cxl_add_features(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_add_features, "CXL");
> +
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("CXL");
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/fwctl.c b/drivers/cxl/fwctl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d8fd68ac8982
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/fwctl.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +static void remove_cxlfs(void *_cxlfs)
> +{
> + struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs = _cxlfs;
> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxlfs->cxlmd;
> + struct fwctl_device *fwctl = &cxlfs->fwctl;
> +
> + cxlmd->cxlfs = NULL;
This is a little nasty. Originally set in enumerate commands, so not
obvious it should be unwound down in here. Perhaps a comment is
enough.
> + fwctl_unregister(fwctl);
> + fwctl_put(fwctl);
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_FREE(free_cxlfs, struct cxl_features_state *, if (_T) fwctl_put(&_T->fwctl))
> +
> +static struct cxl_features_state *
> +__devm_cxl_cfs_allocate(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, const struct fwctl_ops *ops)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs __free(free_cxlfs) =
> + fwctl_alloc_device(dev, ops, struct cxl_features_state, fwctl);
> + if (!cxlfs)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
As above, the caller of this is used with __free that is assuming NULL
for failed.
> +
> + cxlfs->cxlmd = cxlmd;
> + rc = fwctl_register(&cxlfs->fwctl);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, remove_cxlfs, cxlfs);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + return no_free_ptr(cxlfs);
> +}
This use of weak functions is a bit too clever for me to be entirely happy but it
seems right so fair enough.
> +
> +struct cxl_features_state *devm_cxlfs_allocate(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> +{
> + return __devm_cxl_cfs_allocate(cxlmd, &cxlctl_ops);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxlfs_allocate, "CXL");
> +
> +void devm_cxlfs_free(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> +{
> + devm_release_action(&cxlmd->dev, remove_cxlfs, cxlmd);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxlfs_free, "CXL");
> +
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("FWCTL");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-01 0:41 [PATCH v2 0/16] cxl: Add CXL feature commands support via fwctl Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] cxl: Refactor user ioctl command path from mds to mailbox Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] cxl: Enumerate feature commands Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 12:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-03 23:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] cxl: Add Get Supported Features command for kernel usage Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 12:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-01 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] cxl/test: Add Get Supported Features mailbox command support Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 12:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-01 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] cxl/mbox: Add GET_FEATURE mailbox command Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] cxl/mbox: Add SET_FEATURE " Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 12:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] cxl: Setup exclusive CXL features that are reserved for the kernel Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] cxl: Add FWCTL support to the CXL memdev driver Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 1:04 ` Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 12:42 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-02-03 14:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-03 16:22 ` Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] cxl: Add support for FWCTL get driver information callback Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] cxl: Move cxl feature command structs to user header Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] cxl: Add support for fwctl RPC command to enable CXL feature commands Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 13:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for get feature Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for set feature Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] cxl/test: Add Get Feature support to cxl_test Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] cxl/test: Add Set " Dave Jiang
2025-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] fwctl/cxl: Add documentation to FWCTL CXL Dave Jiang
2025-02-03 13:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203124232.00003dd2@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.