From: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <pgonda@google.com>, <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
<nikunj@amd.com>, <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>, <michael.roth@amd.com>,
<sraithal@amd.com>, <prsampat@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: selftests: Abstractions for SEV to decouple policy from type
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:32:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203223205.36121-9-prsampat@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203223205.36121-1-prsampat@amd.com>
In preparation for SNP, cleanup the smoke test to decouple deriving
type from policy. Introduce, wrappers for SEV and SEV-ES types to
abstract the parametrized launch tests calls and reduce verbosity.
No functional change intended.
Tested-by: Srikanth Aithal <sraithal@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
---
v5..v6:
* Collected tags from Srikanth.
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
index b18c78314d5b..3a36cd3ca151 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void compare_xsave(u8 *from_host, u8 *from_guest)
abort();
}
-static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
+static void __test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
double x87val = M_PI;
struct kvm_xsave __attribute__((aligned(64))) xsave = { 0 };
- vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, guest_code_xsave, &vcpu);
+ vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code_xsave, &vcpu);
gva = vm_vaddr_alloc_shared(vm, PAGE_SIZE, KVM_UTIL_MIN_VADDR,
MEM_REGION_TEST_DATA);
hva = addr_gva2hva(vm, gva);
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
: "ymm4", "st", "st(1)", "st(2)", "st(3)", "st(4)", "st(5)", "st(6)", "st(7)");
vcpu_xsave_set(vcpu, &xsave);
- vm_sev_launch(vm, SEV_POLICY_ES | policy, NULL);
+ vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
/* This page is shared, so make it decrypted. */
memset(hva, 0, 4096);
@@ -107,14 +107,12 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
-static void test_sev(void *guest_code, uint64_t policy)
+static void __test_sev(void *guest_code, uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct ucall uc;
- uint32_t type = policy & SEV_POLICY_ES ? KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM : KVM_X86_SEV_VM;
-
vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code, &vcpu);
/* TODO: Validate the measurement is as expected. */
@@ -149,6 +147,21 @@ static void test_sev(void *guest_code, uint64_t policy)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+static void test_sev(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sev(guest_sev_code, KVM_X86_SEV_VM, policy);
+}
+
+static void test_sev_es(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sev(guest_sev_es_code, KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, policy);
+}
+
+static void test_sync_vmsa_sev_es(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sync_vmsa(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, policy);
+}
+
static void guest_shutdown_code(void)
{
struct desc_ptr idt;
@@ -160,16 +173,14 @@ static void guest_shutdown_code(void)
__asm__ __volatile__("ud2");
}
-static void test_sev_es_shutdown(void)
+static void __test_sev_shutdown(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
- uint32_t type = KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM;
-
vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_shutdown_code, &vcpu);
- vm_sev_launch(vm, SEV_POLICY_ES, NULL);
+ vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN,
@@ -179,25 +190,30 @@ static void test_sev_es_shutdown(void)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+static void test_sev_es_shutdown(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sev_shutdown(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, SEV_POLICY_ES);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
const u64 xf_mask = XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX;
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV));
- test_sev(guest_sev_code, SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
- test_sev(guest_sev_code, 0);
+ test_sev(SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sev(0);
if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES)) {
- test_sev(guest_sev_es_code, SEV_POLICY_ES | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
- test_sev(guest_sev_es_code, SEV_POLICY_ES);
+ test_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_ES | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_ES);
- test_sev_es_shutdown();
+ test_sev_es_shutdown(SEV_POLICY_ES);
if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS) &&
(xgetbv(0) & kvm_cpu_supported_xcr0() & xf_mask) == xf_mask) {
- test_sync_vmsa(0);
- test_sync_vmsa(SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sync_vmsa_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_ES);
+ test_sync_vmsa_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG | SEV_POLICY_ES);
}
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 22:31 [PATCH v6 0/9] Basic SEV-SNP Selftests Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] KVM: SEV: Disable SEV-SNP on FW validation failure Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 1:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:07 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: SEV: Disable SEV on platform init failure Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 1:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:09 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:31 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: selftests: SEV-SNP test for KVM_SEV_INIT2 Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: selftests: Add VMGEXIT helper Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 1:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:09 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: selftests: Introduce SEV VM type check Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: selftests: Add library support for interacting with SNP Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 2:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:12 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-19 16:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-20 16:56 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: selftests: Force GUEST_MEMFD flag for SNP VM type Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` Pratik R. Sampat [this message]
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: selftests: Add a basic SEV-SNP smoke test Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 2:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:14 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-19 0:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19 14:58 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203223205.36121-9-prsampat@amd.com \
--to=prsampat@amd.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sraithal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.