From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] futex: Add support task local hash maps.
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:14:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250204151405.GW7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203135935.440018-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> futex: Decrease the waiter count before the unlock operation.
> futex: Prepare for reference counting of the process private hash end
> of operation.
> futex: Re-evaluate the hash bucket after dropping the lock
> futex: Introduce futex_get_locked_hb().
I must admit to not being a fan of these patches. I find them very hard
to review.
In part because while you go stick _put() on various things, there is no
corresponding _get(), things like futex_hash() become an implicit get
-- this took a while to figure out.
I tried tying the whole get/put to the hb variable itself, using the
cleanup stuff. The patch is pretty massive because fairly large chunks
of code got re-indented, but perhaps the final result is clearer, not
sure.
---
io_uring/futex.c | 5 +-
kernel/futex/core.c | 10 +-
kernel/futex/futex.h | 22 ++-
kernel/futex/pi.c | 280 +++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/futex/requeue.c | 427 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
kernel/futex/waitwake.c | 184 +++++++++++----------
6 files changed, 468 insertions(+), 460 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/futex.c b/io_uring/futex.c
index 3159a2b7eeca..18cd5ccde36d 100644
--- a/io_uring/futex.c
+++ b/io_uring/futex.c
@@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ int io_futex_wait(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
struct io_futex *iof = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_futex);
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_futex_data *ifd = NULL;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
int ret;
if (!iof->futex_mask) {
@@ -332,13 +331,13 @@ int io_futex_wait(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ifd->q.wake = io_futex_wake_fn;
ifd->req = req;
+ // XXX task->state is messed up
ret = futex_wait_setup(iof->uaddr, iof->futex_val, iof->futex_flags,
- &ifd->q, &hb);
+ &ifd->q, NULL);
if (!ret) {
hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &ctx->futex_list);
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
- futex_queue(&ifd->q, hb);
return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
}
diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index ebdd76b4ecbb..4b2fcaa60d5b 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -505,9 +505,7 @@ void __futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q)
struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_q_lock(struct futex_q *q)
__acquires(&hb->lock)
{
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
-
- hb = futex_hash(&q->key);
+ CLASS(hb, hb)(&q->key);
/*
* Increment the counter before taking the lock so that
@@ -522,7 +520,7 @@ struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_q_lock(struct futex_q *q)
q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
- return hb;
+ return no_free_ptr(hb);
}
void futex_q_unlock(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
@@ -948,7 +946,6 @@ static void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
{
struct list_head *next, *head = &curr->pi_state_list;
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
union futex_key key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
/*
@@ -961,7 +958,8 @@ static void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
next = head->next;
pi_state = list_entry(next, struct futex_pi_state, list);
key = pi_state->key;
- hb = futex_hash(&key);
+
+ CLASS(hb, hb)(&key);
/*
* We can race against put_pi_state() removing itself from the
diff --git a/kernel/futex/futex.h b/kernel/futex/futex.h
index 99b32e728c4a..cd40f71987b3 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/futex.h
+++ b/kernel/futex/futex.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/wake_q.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
#include <linux/rcuwait.h>
@@ -119,6 +120,19 @@ struct futex_hash_bucket {
struct plist_head chain;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+struct futex_q;
+
+extern struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_hash(union futex_key *key);
+extern struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_q_lock(struct futex_q *q);
+extern void futex_hash_put(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb);
+
+DEFINE_CLASS(hb, struct futex_hash_bucket *,
+ if (_T) futex_hash_put(_T),
+ futex_hash(key), union futex_key *key);
+
+EXTEND_CLASS(hb, _q_lock,
+ futex_q_lock(q), struct futex_q *q);
+
/*
* Priority Inheritance state:
*/
@@ -201,8 +215,6 @@ extern struct hrtimer_sleeper *
futex_setup_timer(ktime_t *time, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
int flags, u64 range_ns);
-extern struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_hash(union futex_key *key);
-
/**
* futex_match - Check whether two futex keys are equal
* @key1: Pointer to key1
@@ -219,9 +231,8 @@ static inline int futex_match(union futex_key *key1, union futex_key *key2)
}
extern int futex_wait_setup(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned int flags,
- struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket **hb);
-extern void futex_wait_queue(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout);
+ struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key2);
+extern void futex_wait(struct futex_q *q, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout);
extern bool __futex_wake_mark(struct futex_q *q);
extern void futex_wake_mark(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q);
@@ -349,7 +360,6 @@ static inline int futex_hb_waiters_pending(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
#endif
}
-extern struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_q_lock(struct futex_q *q);
extern void futex_q_unlock(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb);
diff --git a/kernel/futex/pi.c b/kernel/futex/pi.c
index daea650b16f5..ccc3c5ed21c1 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/pi.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c
@@ -920,7 +920,6 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to;
struct task_struct *exiting = NULL;
struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
int res, ret;
@@ -939,151 +938,166 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
goto out;
retry_private:
- hb = futex_q_lock(&q);
+ if (1) {
+ CLASS(hb_q_lock, hb)(&q);
- ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current,
- &exiting, 0);
- if (unlikely(ret)) {
- /*
- * Atomic work succeeded and we got the lock,
- * or failed. Either way, we do _not_ block.
- */
- switch (ret) {
- case 1:
- /* We got the lock. */
- ret = 0;
- goto out_unlock_put_key;
- case -EFAULT:
- goto uaddr_faulted;
- case -EBUSY:
- case -EAGAIN:
- /*
- * Two reasons for this:
- * - EBUSY: Task is exiting and we just wait for the
- * exit to complete.
- * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
- */
- futex_q_unlock(hb);
+ ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current,
+ &exiting, 0);
+ if (unlikely(ret)) {
/*
- * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
- * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
- * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
+ * Atomic work succeeded and we got the lock,
+ * or failed. Either way, we do _not_ block.
*/
- wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
- cond_resched();
- goto retry;
- default:
- goto out_unlock_put_key;
+ switch (ret) {
+ case 1:
+ /* We got the lock. */
+ ret = 0;
+ goto out_unlock_put_key;
+ case -EFAULT:
+ goto uaddr_faulted;
+ case -EBUSY:
+ case -EAGAIN:
+ /*
+ * Two reasons for this:
+ * - EBUSY: Task is exiting and we just wait for the
+ * exit to complete.
+ * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
+ */
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
+ /*
+ * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
+ * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
+ * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
+ */
+ wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
+ cond_resched();
+ goto retry;
+ default:
+ goto out_unlock_put_key;
+ }
}
- }
- WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
+ WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
- /*
- * Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done:
- */
- __futex_queue(&q, hb);
+ /*
+ * Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done:
+ */
+ __futex_queue(&q, hb);
- if (trylock) {
- ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
- /* Fixup the trylock return value: */
- ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK;
- goto no_block;
- }
+ if (trylock) {
+ ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ /* Fixup the trylock return value: */
+ ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK;
+ goto no_block;
+ }
- /*
- * Must be done before we enqueue the waiter, here is unfortunately
- * under the hb lock, but that *should* work because it does nothing.
- */
- rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
+ /*
+ * Must be done before we enqueue the waiter, here is unfortunately
+ * under the hb lock, but that *should* work because it does nothing.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
- rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
+ rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
- /*
- * On PREEMPT_RT, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
- * hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will
- * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in
- * fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK
- * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
- *
- * Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the
- * latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This
- * interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock
- * handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state
- * before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done.
- */
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
- /*
- * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter
- * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when
- * it sees the futex_q::pi_state.
- */
- ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current, &wake_q);
- raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, &wake_q);
+ /*
+ * On PREEMPT_RT, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
+ * hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will
+ * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in
+ * fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK
+ * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
+ *
+ * Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the
+ * latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This
+ * interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock
+ * handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state
+ * before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
+ /*
+ * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter
+ * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when
+ * it sees the futex_q::pi_state.
+ */
+ ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current, &wake_q);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, &wake_q);
- if (ret) {
- if (ret == 1)
- ret = 0;
- goto cleanup;
- }
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == 1)
+ ret = 0;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
- if (unlikely(to))
- hrtimer_sleeper_start_expires(to, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+ if (unlikely(to))
+ hrtimer_sleeper_start_expires(to, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
- ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
+ ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
cleanup:
- /*
- * If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must
- * must unwind the above, however we canont lock hb->lock because
- * rt_mutex already has a waiter enqueued and hb->lock can itself try
- * and enqueue an rt_waiter through rtlock.
- *
- * Doing the cleanup without holding hb->lock can cause inconsistent
- * state between hb and pi_state, but only in the direction of not
- * seeing a waiter that is leaving.
- *
- * See futex_unlock_pi(), it deals with this inconsistency.
- *
- * There be dragons here, since we must deal with the inconsistency on
- * the way out (here), it is impossible to detect/warn about the race
- * the other way around (missing an incoming waiter).
- *
- * What could possibly go wrong...
- */
- if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter))
- ret = 0;
+ /*
+ * If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must
+ * must unwind the above, however we canont lock hb->lock because
+ * rt_mutex already has a waiter enqueued and hb->lock can itself try
+ * and enqueue an rt_waiter through rtlock.
+ *
+ * Doing the cleanup without holding hb->lock can cause inconsistent
+ * state between hb and pi_state, but only in the direction of not
+ * seeing a waiter that is leaving.
+ *
+ * See futex_unlock_pi(), it deals with this inconsistency.
+ *
+ * There be dragons here, since we must deal with the inconsistency on
+ * the way out (here), it is impossible to detect/warn about the race
+ * the other way around (missing an incoming waiter).
+ *
+ * What could possibly go wrong...
+ */
+ if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter))
+ ret = 0;
- /*
- * Now that the rt_waiter has been dequeued, it is safe to use
- * spinlock/rtlock (which might enqueue its own rt_waiter) and fix up
- * the
- */
- spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
- /*
- * Waiter is unqueued.
- */
- rt_mutex_post_schedule();
+ /*
+ * Now that the rt_waiter has been dequeued, it is safe to use
+ * spinlock/rtlock (which might enqueue its own rt_waiter) and fix up
+ * the
+ */
+ spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
+ /*
+ * Waiter is unqueued.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_post_schedule();
no_block:
- /*
- * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
- * haven't already.
- */
- res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret);
- /*
- * If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it acquired
- * the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
- */
- if (res)
- ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
+ /*
+ * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
+ * haven't already.
+ */
+ res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret);
+ /*
+ * If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it acquired
+ * the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
+ */
+ if (res)
+ ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
- futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
- spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
- goto out;
+ futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
+ spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
+ goto out;
out_unlock_put_key:
- futex_q_unlock(hb);
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
+ goto out;
+
+uaddr_faulted:
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
+
+ ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
+ goto retry_private;
+
+ goto retry;
+ }
out:
if (to) {
@@ -1092,17 +1106,6 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
}
return ret != -EINTR ? ret : -ERESTARTNOINTR;
-uaddr_faulted:
- futex_q_unlock(hb);
-
- ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
- if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
- goto retry_private;
-
- goto retry;
}
/*
@@ -1114,7 +1117,6 @@ int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
{
u32 curval, uval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(current);
union futex_key key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
struct futex_q *top_waiter;
int ret;
@@ -1134,7 +1136,7 @@ int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
if (ret)
return ret;
- hb = futex_hash(&key);
+ CLASS(hb, hb)(&key);
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
retry_hb:
diff --git a/kernel/futex/requeue.c b/kernel/futex/requeue.c
index b47bb764b352..01ba7d09036a 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/requeue.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/requeue.c
@@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags1,
union futex_key key1 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT, key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
int task_count = 0, ret;
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, *hb2;
struct futex_q *this, *next;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
@@ -443,240 +442,242 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags1,
if (requeue_pi && futex_match(&key1, &key2))
return -EINVAL;
- hb1 = futex_hash(&key1);
- hb2 = futex_hash(&key2);
-
retry_private:
- futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
- double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ if (1) {
+ CLASS(hb, hb1)(&key1);
+ CLASS(hb, hb2)(&key2);
- if (likely(cmpval != NULL)) {
- u32 curval;
+ futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
+ double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- ret = futex_get_value_locked(&curval, uaddr1);
+ if (likely(cmpval != NULL)) {
+ u32 curval;
- if (unlikely(ret)) {
- double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ ret = futex_get_value_locked(&curval, uaddr1);
- ret = get_user(curval, uaddr1);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (unlikely(ret)) {
+ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
- if (!(flags1 & FLAGS_SHARED))
- goto retry_private;
+ ret = get_user(curval, uaddr1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- goto retry;
- }
- if (curval != *cmpval) {
- ret = -EAGAIN;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- }
+ if (!(flags1 & FLAGS_SHARED))
+ goto retry_private;
- if (requeue_pi) {
- struct task_struct *exiting = NULL;
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ if (curval != *cmpval) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ }
- /*
- * Attempt to acquire uaddr2 and wake the top waiter. If we
- * intend to requeue waiters, force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS
- * bit. We force this here where we are able to easily handle
- * faults rather in the requeue loop below.
- *
- * Updates topwaiter::requeue_state if a top waiter exists.
- */
- ret = futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(uaddr2, hb1, hb2, &key1,
- &key2, &pi_state,
- &exiting, nr_requeue);
+ if (requeue_pi) {
+ struct task_struct *exiting = NULL;
- /*
- * At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or
- * is waiting on it. In both cases pi_state has been
- * established and an initial refcount on it. In case of an
- * error there's nothing.
- *
- * The top waiter's requeue_state is up to date:
- *
- * - If the lock was acquired atomically (ret == 1), then
- * the state is Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED.
- *
- * The top waiter has been dequeued and woken up and can
- * return to user space immediately. The kernel/user
- * space state is consistent. In case that there must be
- * more waiters requeued the WAITERS bit in the user
- * space futex is set so the top waiter task has to go
- * into the syscall slowpath to unlock the futex. This
- * will block until this requeue operation has been
- * completed and the hash bucket locks have been
- * dropped.
- *
- * - If the trylock failed with an error (ret < 0) then
- * the state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE, i.e. "nothing
- * happened", or Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE when there was an
- * interleaved early wakeup.
- *
- * - If the trylock did not succeed (ret == 0) then the
- * state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS or
- * Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT if an early wakeup interleaved.
- * This will be cleaned up in the loop below, which
- * cannot fail because futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() did
- * the same sanity checks for requeue_pi as the loop
- * below does.
- */
- switch (ret) {
- case 0:
- /* We hold a reference on the pi state. */
- break;
-
- case 1:
/*
- * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() acquired the user space
- * futex. Adjust task_count.
+ * Attempt to acquire uaddr2 and wake the top waiter. If we
+ * intend to requeue waiters, force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS
+ * bit. We force this here where we are able to easily handle
+ * faults rather in the requeue loop below.
+ *
+ * Updates topwaiter::requeue_state if a top waiter exists.
*/
- task_count++;
- ret = 0;
- break;
+ ret = futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(uaddr2, hb1, hb2, &key1,
+ &key2, &pi_state,
+ &exiting, nr_requeue);
- /*
- * If the above failed, then pi_state is NULL and
- * waiter::requeue_state is correct.
- */
- case -EFAULT:
- double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
- ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
- if (!ret)
- goto retry;
- return ret;
- case -EBUSY:
- case -EAGAIN:
/*
- * Two reasons for this:
- * - EBUSY: Owner is exiting and we just wait for the
- * exit to complete.
- * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
+ * At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or
+ * is waiting on it. In both cases pi_state has been
+ * established and an initial refcount on it. In case of an
+ * error there's nothing.
+ *
+ * The top waiter's requeue_state is up to date:
+ *
+ * - If the lock was acquired atomically (ret == 1), then
+ * the state is Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED.
+ *
+ * The top waiter has been dequeued and woken up and can
+ * return to user space immediately. The kernel/user
+ * space state is consistent. In case that there must be
+ * more waiters requeued the WAITERS bit in the user
+ * space futex is set so the top waiter task has to go
+ * into the syscall slowpath to unlock the futex. This
+ * will block until this requeue operation has been
+ * completed and the hash bucket locks have been
+ * dropped.
+ *
+ * - If the trylock failed with an error (ret < 0) then
+ * the state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE, i.e. "nothing
+ * happened", or Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE when there was an
+ * interleaved early wakeup.
+ *
+ * - If the trylock did not succeed (ret == 0) then the
+ * state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS or
+ * Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT if an early wakeup interleaved.
+ * This will be cleaned up in the loop below, which
+ * cannot fail because futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() did
+ * the same sanity checks for requeue_pi as the loop
+ * below does.
*/
- double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
- /*
- * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
- * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
- * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
- */
- wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
- cond_resched();
- goto retry;
- default:
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- }
-
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
- if (task_count - nr_wake >= nr_requeue)
- break;
-
- if (!futex_match(&this->key, &key1))
- continue;
-
- /*
- * FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
- * be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
- *
- * We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state,
- * which is awaiting a futex_unlock_pi().
- */
- if ((requeue_pi && !this->rt_waiter) ||
- (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter) ||
- this->pi_state) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- break;
- }
-
- /* Plain futexes just wake or requeue and are done */
- if (!requeue_pi) {
- if (++task_count <= nr_wake)
- this->wake(&wake_q, this);
- else
- requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
- continue;
+ switch (ret) {
+ case 0:
+ /* We hold a reference on the pi state. */
+ break;
+
+ case 1:
+ /*
+ * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() acquired the user space
+ * futex. Adjust task_count.
+ */
+ task_count++;
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * If the above failed, then pi_state is NULL and
+ * waiter::requeue_state is correct.
+ */
+ case -EFAULT:
+ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
+ if (!ret)
+ goto retry;
+ return ret;
+ case -EBUSY:
+ case -EAGAIN:
+ /*
+ * Two reasons for this:
+ * - EBUSY: Owner is exiting and we just wait for the
+ * exit to complete.
+ * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
+ */
+ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ /*
+ * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
+ * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
+ * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
+ */
+ wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
+ cond_resched();
+ goto retry;
+ default:
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
}
- /* Ensure we requeue to the expected futex for requeue_pi. */
- if (!futex_match(this->requeue_pi_key, &key2)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- break;
- }
+ plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
+ if (task_count - nr_wake >= nr_requeue)
+ break;
- /*
- * Requeue nr_requeue waiters and possibly one more in the case
- * of requeue_pi if we couldn't acquire the lock atomically.
- *
- * Prepare the waiter to take the rt_mutex. Take a refcount
- * on the pi_state and store the pointer in the futex_q
- * object of the waiter.
- */
- get_pi_state(pi_state);
+ if (!futex_match(&this->key, &key1))
+ continue;
- /* Don't requeue when the waiter is already on the way out. */
- if (!futex_requeue_pi_prepare(this, pi_state)) {
/*
- * Early woken waiter signaled that it is on the
- * way out. Drop the pi_state reference and try the
- * next waiter. @this->pi_state is still NULL.
+ * FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
+ * be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
+ *
+ * We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state,
+ * which is awaiting a futex_unlock_pi().
*/
- put_pi_state(pi_state);
- continue;
- }
+ if ((requeue_pi && !this->rt_waiter) ||
+ (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter) ||
+ this->pi_state) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Plain futexes just wake or requeue and are done */
+ if (!requeue_pi) {
+ if (++task_count <= nr_wake)
+ this->wake(&wake_q, this);
+ else
+ requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Ensure we requeue to the expected futex for requeue_pi. */
+ if (!futex_match(this->requeue_pi_key, &key2)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
- ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
- this->rt_waiter,
- this->task);
-
- if (ret == 1) {
- /*
- * We got the lock. We do neither drop the refcount
- * on pi_state nor clear this->pi_state because the
- * waiter needs the pi_state for cleaning up the
- * user space value. It will drop the refcount
- * after doing so. this::requeue_state is updated
- * in the wakeup as well.
- */
- requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
- task_count++;
- } else if (!ret) {
- /* Waiter is queued, move it to hb2 */
- requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
- futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, 0);
- task_count++;
- } else {
/*
- * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() detected a potential
- * deadlock when we tried to queue that waiter.
- * Drop the pi_state reference which we took above
- * and remove the pointer to the state from the
- * waiters futex_q object.
+ * Requeue nr_requeue waiters and possibly one more in the case
+ * of requeue_pi if we couldn't acquire the lock atomically.
+ *
+ * Prepare the waiter to take the rt_mutex. Take a refcount
+ * on the pi_state and store the pointer in the futex_q
+ * object of the waiter.
*/
- this->pi_state = NULL;
- put_pi_state(pi_state);
- futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, ret);
- /*
- * We stop queueing more waiters and let user space
- * deal with the mess.
- */
- break;
+ get_pi_state(pi_state);
+
+ /* Don't requeue when the waiter is already on the way out. */
+ if (!futex_requeue_pi_prepare(this, pi_state)) {
+ /*
+ * Early woken waiter signaled that it is on the
+ * way out. Drop the pi_state reference and try the
+ * next waiter. @this->pi_state is still NULL.
+ */
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
+ this->rt_waiter,
+ this->task);
+
+ if (ret == 1) {
+ /*
+ * We got the lock. We do neither drop the refcount
+ * on pi_state nor clear this->pi_state because the
+ * waiter needs the pi_state for cleaning up the
+ * user space value. It will drop the refcount
+ * after doing so. this::requeue_state is updated
+ * in the wakeup as well.
+ */
+ requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
+ task_count++;
+ } else if (!ret) {
+ /* Waiter is queued, move it to hb2 */
+ requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
+ futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, 0);
+ task_count++;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() detected a potential
+ * deadlock when we tried to queue that waiter.
+ * Drop the pi_state reference which we took above
+ * and remove the pointer to the state from the
+ * waiters futex_q object.
+ */
+ this->pi_state = NULL;
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
+ futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, ret);
+ /*
+ * We stop queueing more waiters and let user space
+ * deal with the mess.
+ */
+ break;
+ }
}
- }
- /*
- * We took an extra initial reference to the pi_state in
- * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(). We need to drop it here again.
- */
- put_pi_state(pi_state);
+ /*
+ * We took an extra initial reference to the pi_state in
+ * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(). We need to drop it here again.
+ */
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
out_unlock:
- double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ }
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
- futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
return ret ? ret : task_count;
}
@@ -805,22 +806,12 @@ int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
* Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, it holds hb->lock and q
* is initialized.
*/
- ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &hb);
+ ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &key2);
if (ret)
goto out;
- /*
- * The check above which compares uaddrs is not sufficient for
- * shared futexes. We need to compare the keys:
- */
- if (futex_match(&q.key, &key2)) {
- futex_q_unlock(hb);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
/* Queue the futex_q, drop the hb lock, wait for wakeup. */
- futex_wait_queue(hb, &q, to);
+ futex_wait(&q, to);
switch (futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(&q)) {
case Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE:
diff --git a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
index eb86a7ade06a..daf9ab07a77f 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
@@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ void futex_wake_mark(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
*/
int futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
{
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
struct futex_q *this, *next;
union futex_key key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
@@ -170,7 +169,7 @@ int futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
if ((flags & FLAGS_STRICT) && !nr_wake)
return 0;
- hb = futex_hash(&key);
+ CLASS(hb, hb)(&key);
/* Make sure we really have tasks to wakeup */
if (!futex_hb_waiters_pending(hb))
@@ -253,7 +252,6 @@ int futex_wake_op(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
int nr_wake, int nr_wake2, int op)
{
union futex_key key1 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT, key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, *hb2;
struct futex_q *this, *next;
int ret, op_ret;
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
@@ -266,67 +264,69 @@ int futex_wake_op(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
if (unlikely(ret != 0))
return ret;
- hb1 = futex_hash(&key1);
- hb2 = futex_hash(&key2);
-
retry_private:
- double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- op_ret = futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, uaddr2);
- if (unlikely(op_ret < 0)) {
- double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
-
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU) ||
- unlikely(op_ret != -EFAULT && op_ret != -EAGAIN)) {
- /*
- * we don't get EFAULT from MMU faults if we don't have
- * an MMU, but we might get them from range checking
- */
- ret = op_ret;
- return ret;
- }
-
- if (op_ret == -EFAULT) {
- ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
- if (ret)
+ if (1) {
+ CLASS(hb, hb1)(&key1);
+ CLASS(hb, hb2)(&key2);
+
+ double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ op_ret = futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, uaddr2);
+ if (unlikely(op_ret < 0)) {
+ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU) ||
+ unlikely(op_ret != -EFAULT && op_ret != -EAGAIN)) {
+ /*
+ * we don't get EFAULT from MMU faults if we don't have
+ * an MMU, but we might get them from range checking
+ */
+ ret = op_ret;
return ret;
- }
-
- cond_resched();
- if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
- goto retry_private;
- goto retry;
- }
+ }
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
- if (futex_match (&this->key, &key1)) {
- if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
+ if (op_ret == -EFAULT) {
+ ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
- this->wake(&wake_q, this);
- if (++ret >= nr_wake)
- break;
+
+ cond_resched();
+ if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
+ goto retry_private;
+ goto retry;
}
- }
- if (op_ret > 0) {
- op_ret = 0;
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb2->chain, list) {
- if (futex_match (&this->key, &key2)) {
+ plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
+ if (futex_match (&this->key, &key1)) {
if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
this->wake(&wake_q, this);
- if (++op_ret >= nr_wake2)
+ if (++ret >= nr_wake)
break;
}
}
- ret += op_ret;
- }
+
+ if (op_ret > 0) {
+ op_ret = 0;
+ plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb2->chain, list) {
+ if (futex_match (&this->key, &key2)) {
+ if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ this->wake(&wake_q, this);
+ if (++op_ret >= nr_wake2)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ ret += op_ret;
+ }
out_unlock:
- double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
+ }
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
return ret;
}
@@ -339,17 +339,8 @@ static long futex_wait_restart(struct restart_block *restart);
* @q: the futex_q to queue up on
* @timeout: the prepared hrtimer_sleeper, or null for no timeout
*/
-void futex_wait_queue(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
+void futex_wait(struct futex_q *q, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
{
- /*
- * The task state is guaranteed to be set before another task can
- * wake it. set_current_state() is implemented using smp_store_mb() and
- * futex_queue() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
- * access to the hash list and forcing another memory barrier.
- */
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
- futex_queue(q, hb);
/* Arm the timer */
if (timeout)
@@ -451,20 +442,22 @@ int futex_wait_multiple_setup(struct futex_vector *vs, int count, int *woken)
struct futex_q *q = &vs[i].q;
u32 val = vs[i].w.val;
- hb = futex_q_lock(q);
- ret = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr);
+ if (1) {
+ CLASS(hb_q_lock, hb)(q);
+ ret = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr);
+
+ if (!ret && uval == val) {
+ /*
+ * The bucket lock can't be held while dealing with the
+ * next futex. Queue each futex at this moment so hb can
+ * be unlocked.
+ */
+ futex_queue(q, hb);
+ continue;
+ }
- if (!ret && uval == val) {
- /*
- * The bucket lock can't be held while dealing with the
- * next futex. Queue each futex at this moment so hb can
- * be unlocked.
- */
- futex_queue(q, hb);
- continue;
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
}
-
- futex_q_unlock(hb);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
/*
@@ -589,7 +582,7 @@ int futex_wait_multiple(struct futex_vector *vs, unsigned int count,
* - <1 - -EFAULT or -EWOULDBLOCK (uaddr does not contain val) and hb is unlocked
*/
int futex_wait_setup(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned int flags,
- struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket **hb)
+ struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key2)
{
u32 uval;
int ret;
@@ -618,26 +611,42 @@ int futex_wait_setup(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned int flags,
return ret;
retry_private:
- *hb = futex_q_lock(q);
+ if (1) {
+ CLASS(hb_q_lock, hb)(q);
- ret = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr);
+ ret = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr);
- if (ret) {
- futex_q_unlock(*hb);
+ if (ret) {
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
- ret = get_user(uval, uaddr);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ ret = get_user(uval, uaddr);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
- goto retry_private;
+ if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
+ goto retry_private;
- goto retry;
- }
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ if (uval != val) {
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
+ return -EWOULDBLOCK;
+ }
+
+ if (key2 && !futex_match(&q->key, key2)) {
+ futex_q_unlock(hb);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- if (uval != val) {
- futex_q_unlock(*hb);
- ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
+ /*
+ * The task state is guaranteed to be set before another task can
+ * wake it. set_current_state() is implemented using smp_store_mb() and
+ * futex_queue() calls spin_unlock() upon completion, both serializing
+ * access to the hash list and forcing another memory barrier.
+ */
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
+ futex_queue(q, hb);
}
return ret;
@@ -647,7 +656,6 @@ int __futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, u32 bitset)
{
struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
int ret;
if (!bitset)
@@ -660,12 +668,12 @@ int __futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val,
* Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, it holds hb->lock and q
* is initialized.
*/
- ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &hb);
+ ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* futex_queue and wait for wakeup, timeout, or a signal. */
- futex_wait_queue(hb, &q, to);
+ futex_wait(&q, to);
/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
if (!futex_unqueue(&q))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 13:59 [PATCH v8 00/15] futex: Add support task local hash maps Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] rcuref: Avoid false positive "imbalanced put" report Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] futex: Create helper function to initialize a hash slot Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] futex: Add basic infrastructure for local task local hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 15:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 8:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-07 9:41 ` Juri Lelli
2025-02-07 11:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-07 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 14:47 ` Juri Lelli
2025-02-03 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 15:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-04 9:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] futex: Allow automatic allocation of process wide futex hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 15:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] futex: Hash only the address for private futexes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] futex: Move private hashing into its own function Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 7:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] futex: Decrease the waiter count before the unlock operation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] futex: Prepare for reference counting of the process private hash end of operation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 7:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-05 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] futex: Re-evaluate the hash bucket after dropping the lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] futex: Introduce futex_get_locked_hb() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] futex: Acquire a hash reference in futex_wait_multiple_setup() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] futex: Allow to re-allocate the private local hash Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 8:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] futex: Resize local futex hash table based on number of threads Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 8:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-07 9:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] futex: Use a hashmask instead of hashsize Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-03 13:59 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] futex: Avoid allocating new local hash if there is something pending Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 15:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-02-05 8:46 ` [PATCH v8 00/15] futex: Add support task local hash maps Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-05 12:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-05 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 16:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-20 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-20 15:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-21 16:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-21 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250204151405.GW7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.