From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, ravi.bangoria@amd.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
willy@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/24] perf: Add this_cpc() helper
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 11:21:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205102449.906046341@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250205102120.531585416@infradead.org
As a preparation for adding yet another indirection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1176,23 +1176,28 @@ static int perf_mux_hrtimer_restart_ipi(
return perf_mux_hrtimer_restart(arg);
}
+static __always_inline struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *this_cpc(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+ return this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+}
+
void perf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- int *count = &this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context)->pmu_disable_count;
+ int *count = &this_cpc(pmu)->pmu_disable_count;
if (!(*count)++)
pmu->pmu_disable(pmu);
}
void perf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- int *count = &this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context)->pmu_disable_count;
+ int *count = &this_cpc(pmu)->pmu_disable_count;
if (!--(*count))
pmu->pmu_enable(pmu);
}
static void perf_assert_pmu_disabled(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- int *count = &this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context)->pmu_disable_count;
+ int *count = &this_cpc(pmu)->pmu_disable_count;
WARN_ON_ONCE(*count == 0);
}
@@ -2304,7 +2309,7 @@ static void
event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
{
struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc = event->pmu_ctx;
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpu_ptr(epc->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(epc->pmu);
enum perf_event_state state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
// XXX cpc serialization, probably per-cpu IRQ disabled
@@ -2445,9 +2450,8 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_e
pmu_ctx->rotate_necessary = 0;
if (ctx->task && ctx->is_active) {
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc;
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(pmu_ctx->pmu);
- cpc = this_cpu_ptr(pmu_ctx->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpc->task_epc && cpc->task_epc != pmu_ctx);
cpc->task_epc = NULL;
}
@@ -2585,7 +2589,7 @@ static int
event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
{
struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc = event->pmu_ctx;
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpu_ptr(epc->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(epc->pmu);
int ret = 0;
WARN_ON_ONCE(event->ctx != ctx);
@@ -2692,7 +2696,7 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_
static int group_can_go_on(struct perf_event *event, int can_add_hw)
{
struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc = event->pmu_ctx;
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpu_ptr(epc->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(epc->pmu);
/*
* Groups consisting entirely of software events can always go on.
@@ -3315,9 +3319,8 @@ static void __pmu_ctx_sched_out(struct p
struct pmu *pmu = pmu_ctx->pmu;
if (ctx->task && !(ctx->is_active & EVENT_ALL)) {
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc;
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(pmu);
- cpc = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpc->task_epc && cpc->task_epc != pmu_ctx);
cpc->task_epc = NULL;
}
@@ -3565,7 +3568,7 @@ static void perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(struc
struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc;
list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
- cpc = this_cpu_ptr(pmu_ctx->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ cpc = this_cpc(pmu_ctx->pmu);
if (cpc->sched_cb_usage && pmu_ctx->pmu->sched_task)
pmu_ctx->pmu->sched_task(pmu_ctx, sched_in);
@@ -3674,7 +3677,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, perf_sched_cb
void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(pmu);
this_cpu_dec(perf_sched_cb_usages);
barrier();
@@ -3686,7 +3689,7 @@ void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu)
void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(pmu);
if (!cpc->sched_cb_usage++)
list_add(&cpc->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
@@ -3810,7 +3813,7 @@ static void __link_epc(struct perf_event
if (!pmu_ctx->ctx->task)
return;
- cpc = this_cpu_ptr(pmu_ctx->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
+ cpc = this_cpc(pmu_ctx->pmu);
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpc->task_epc && cpc->task_epc != pmu_ctx);
cpc->task_epc = pmu_ctx;
}
@@ -3939,10 +3942,9 @@ static int merge_sched_in(struct perf_ev
perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR);
} else {
- struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc;
+ struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc = this_cpc(event->pmu_ctx->pmu);
event->pmu_ctx->rotate_necessary = 1;
- cpc = this_cpu_ptr(event->pmu_ctx->pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
perf_mux_hrtimer_restart(cpc);
group_update_userpage(event);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 10:21 [PATCH v2 00/24] perf: Make perf_pmu_unregister() usable Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] lockdep: Fix might_fault() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] perf: Ensure bpf_perf_link path is properly serialized Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] perf: Simplify child event tear-down Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] perf: Simplify perf_event_free_task() wait Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] perf: Simplify perf_event_release_kernel() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] perf: Fix pmus_lock vs pmus_srcu ordering Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-27 16:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] perf: Fix perf_pmu_register() vs perf_init_event() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] perf: Cleanup perf_try_init_event() Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 11:29 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Clean up perf_try_init_event() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] perf: Simplify perf_event_alloc() error path Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] perf: Simplify perf_pmu_register() " Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] perf: Simplify perf_pmu_register() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] perf: Simplify perf_init_event() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] perf: Simplify perf_event_alloc() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] perf: Merge pmu_disable_count into cpu_pmu_context Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] perf: Detach perf_cpu_pmu_context and pmu lifetimes Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] perf: Introduce perf_free_addr_filters() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] perf: Robustify perf_event_free_bpf_prog() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] perf: Simplify perf_mmap() control flow Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-03 5:39 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-03-03 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-03 13:36 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-03-04 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] perf: Fix perf_mmap() failure path Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] perf: Further simplify perf_mmap() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] perf: Remove retry loop from perf_mmap() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] perf: Lift event->mmap_mutex in perf_mmap() Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] perf: Make perf_pmu_unregister() useable Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-10 6:39 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-11 15:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-10 6:42 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-12 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-13 7:52 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-13 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-14 3:57 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-14 20:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-17 8:24 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-17 16:31 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-19 13:23 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-19 14:30 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-10 6:59 ` Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-13 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-03 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] perf: Make perf_pmu_unregister() usable Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250205102449.906046341@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.