From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:15:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205191503.GR21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205135821.178256-11-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 08:58:21AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Modify zero range to advance the iter directly. Replace the local pos
> and length calculations with direct advances and loop based on iter
> state instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index f953bf66beb1..ec227b45f3aa 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -1345,17 +1345,16 @@ static inline int iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(struct iomap_iter *i)
>
> static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> {
> - loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> - loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
> - loff_t written = 0;
> + u64 bytes = iomap_length(iter);
> + int status;
>
> do {
> struct folio *folio;
> - int status;
> size_t offset;
> - size_t bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, length);
> + loff_t pos = iter->pos;
I wonder, is there any need for the local variable here?
Looks fine to me though.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> bool ret;
>
> + bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, bytes);
> status = iomap_write_begin(iter, pos, bytes, &folio);
> if (status)
> return status;
> @@ -1376,14 +1375,14 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))
> return -EIO;
>
> - pos += bytes;
> - length -= bytes;
> - written += bytes;
> - } while (length > 0);
> + status = iomap_iter_advance(iter, &bytes);
> + if (status)
> + break;
> + } while (bytes > 0);
>
> if (did_zero)
> *did_zero = true;
> - return written;
> + return status;
> }
>
> int
> @@ -1436,11 +1435,14 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
>
> if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE ||
> srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
> - loff_t proc = iomap_length(&iter);
> + s64 proc;
>
> if (range_dirty) {
> range_dirty = false;
> proc = iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(&iter);
> + } else {
> + u64 length = iomap_length(&iter);
> + proc = iomap_iter_advance(&iter, &length);
> }
> iter.processed = proc;
> continue;
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 13:58 [PATCH v5 00/10] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from iter advance Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] iomap: refactor iomap_iter() length check and tracepoint Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] iomap: lift error code check out of iomap_iter_advance() Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] iomap: lift iter termination logic from iomap_iter_advance() Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] iomap: export iomap_iter_advance() and return remaining length Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:26 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:27 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 20:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:15 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250205191503.GR21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.