From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526B7C02196 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:03:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=n3B6GkoF4/TUzTqGKurnKW93IpQpwd5TQSP6kcfbI30=; b=cTyAwPqc0LSbLz+ahSCPDk/t/Z RTP/l5l6lDFs+83pTU0/58SmOdbXfTKQAj+2sfiZu44WE8ymZ9YPT2e0qJKWtxvN91/lhShyN5QLf OIwlFKpG8Xv58kBJFLPsOMB1vktd09caytK5k9bo5LKYyH41b5P1uZtFnPLRbKEdfEEgWwbciXWHz tHNCs28+6LGgDaDn0vubKnvlO0WQ8kzXlzXmhuAfSrIIGs8dhRRx78E4niFIw2pFCCGyHl+qRuOET JJKPwf3AzYwh+HDwA80C17ewGqegGF18gugAXvLsShpZnpO/4F3vR5qyYsqwj3m+GKGYD2iiV/cmU TDRnzjPA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tfwrH-00000005fnO-2wHy; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:03:35 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tfwgQ-00000005eQF-0EUr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 07:52:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E665A439F8; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C493C4CEDD; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:52:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1738828340; bh=88KiQixzKQj5rRXEekbKnJmhNWTZtXqiwpRxpjLPSJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s/04mWHLv/q0fTizs8GnPLLAN21F3yucrVtVGTFut5UMv/abPKUv6mx1R+nfI1F86 NYoh/PmmwupjFT8CL9zWItndkNSsA1RSpozAdPa+MRDLFXrkFaEQQgCR172XSZRqpa YUqUWLrX2t36zIOACa4NI6+RI8Z4OUDjcNgySxeo= Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:52:19 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ryan Roberts Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Muchun Song , Pasha Tatashin , Uladzislau Rezki , Christoph Hellwig , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Anshuman Khandual , Dev Jain , Alexandre Ghiti , Steve Capper , Kevin Brodsky , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/16] hugetlb and vmalloc fixes and perf improvements Message-Id: <20250205235219.3c3a4b968087d1386d708b04@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20250205151003.88959-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> References: <20250205151003.88959-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250205_235222_168902_4ED51F8A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:09:40 +0000 Ryan Roberts wrote: > I'm guessing that going in > through the arm64 tree is the right approach here? Seems that way, just from the line counts. I suggest two series - one for the four cc:stable patches and one for the 6.14 material. This depends on whether the ARM maintainers want to get patches 1-4 into the -stable stream before the 6.14 release.