From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+3126ab3db03db42e7a31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
eflorac@intellique.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC 6.12] xfs: bug fixes for 6.12.y LTS
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:27:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250207192715.GU21799@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205155634.GG21808@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 07:56:34AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 06:55:19AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:51:15AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Here's a bunch of bespoke hand-ported bug fixes for 6.12 LTS.
> > >
> > > If you're going to start using this code, I strongly recommend pulling
> > > from my git trees, which are linked below.
> > >
> > > With a bit of luck, this should all go splendidly.
> > > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
> >
> > Should we take these into the next stable release, or do you want us to
> > wait a bit?
>
> Let's wait a day or two to see if anyone has objections, and then I'll
> send this series again without the RFC tag. Already I think I see that
> the first patch needs a cc:stable tag to capture the version.
Ok, it's been three days and nobody objected. I'll send a proper
patchset with backports shortly.
--D
> --D
>
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 18:51 [PATCHSET RFC 6.12] xfs: bug fixes for 6.12.y LTS Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:51 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: avoid nested calls to __xfs_trans_commit Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 22:50 ` Sasha Levin
2025-02-04 18:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: don't lose solo superblock counter update transactions Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: don't lose solo dquot " Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: separate dquot buffer reads from xfs_dqflush Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: clean up log item accesses in xfs_qm_dqflush{,_done} Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: attach dquot buffer to dquot log item buffer Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: convert quotacheck to attach dquot buffers Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: don't over-report free space or inodes in statvfs Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: release the dquot buf outside of qli_lock Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 18:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: lock dquot buffer before detaching dquot from b_li_list Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 5:55 ` [PATCHSET RFC 6.12] xfs: bug fixes for 6.12.y LTS Greg KH
2025-02-05 15:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 19:27 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250207192715.GU21799@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+3126ab3db03db42e7a31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.