From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] btrfs: separate/simplify/unify subpage handling
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 20:30:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250207193041.GN5777@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1738902149.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:55:59PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [CHANGELOG]
> v2:
> - Fix a crash in 4K page sized system caused by
> btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty()
> It looks like using btrfs_meta_folio_set_writeback() and
> btrfs_meta_folio_clear_writeback() is screwing up the btree inode map.
>
> Fix it by reverting to the old manually clearing of
> PAGECACHE_DIRTY_TAG.
>
> [METADATA SUBPAGE CHECKS]
> Currently we only have one btrfs_is_subpage() check, utilized by data
> and metadata.
>
> But the truth is, btrfs_is_subpage() can return incorrect result if the
> target folio belongs to a dummy extent buffer.
>
> This means we have quite some metadata call sites doing their own
> metadata specific subpage check.
>
> [SUBPAGE SPECIFIC HANDLINGS]
> There are several functions that split the metadata subpage handling
> into a dedicated path.
>
> But the truth is, a lot of such paths only have minor differences
> compared to the regular routine.
>
> [THIS SERIES]
> This series address the above problems and prepare for the incoming data
> larger folio support by:
>
> - Remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page
> This is mostly a preparation for the future data larger folio support.
>
> - Introduce a dedicated metadata specific subpage check
>
> - Unify/simplify metadata subpage handling
> So that we have a single unified path for metadata
>
> Qu Wenruo (8):
> btrfs: remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page
> btrfs: extract metadata subpage detection into a dedicated helper
> btrfs: make subpage attach and detach to handle metadata properly
> btrfs: use metadata specific helpers to simplify extent buffer helpers
> btrfs: simplify btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty()
> btrfs: simplify write_one_eb()
> btrfs: simplify read_extent_buffer_pages_nowait()
> btrfs: require strict data/metadata split for subpage check
All look good to me.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Please update the subjects in the simplify patches in what regard they
simplify the functions. For example "sipmlify subpage handling in ...".
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 4:25 [PATCH v2 0/8] btrfs: separate/simplify/unify subpage handling Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] btrfs: remove btrfs_fs_info::sectors_per_page Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] btrfs: extract metadata subpage detection into a dedicated helper Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] btrfs: make subpage attach and detach to handle metadata properly Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] btrfs: use metadata specific helpers to simplify extent buffer helpers Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] btrfs: simplify btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty() Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] btrfs: simplify write_one_eb() Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] btrfs: simplify read_extent_buffer_pages_nowait() Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] btrfs: require strict data/metadata split for subpage check Qu Wenruo
2025-02-07 19:30 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250207193041.GN5777@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.