From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: drivers/char/applicom.c:131:25: warning: variable 'byte_reset_it' set but not used
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:42:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502081611.XAQNNgvR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
TO: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 8f6629c004b193d23612641c3607e785819e97ab
commit: 250c1a694ff304e5d69e74ab32755eddcc2b8f65 ARM: pxa: convert to multiplatform
date: 2 years, 9 months ago
config: arm-randconfig-004-20250120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502081611.XAQNNgvR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502081611.XAQNNgvR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502081611.XAQNNgvR-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/char/applicom.c:32:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:1522:
In file included from include/linux/dmapool.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:1719:
include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> drivers/char/applicom.c:131:25: warning: variable 'byte_reset_it' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
131 | volatile unsigned char byte_reset_it;
| ^
>> drivers/char/applicom.c:540:6: warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
540 | int ret = 0;
| ^
drivers/char/applicom.c:703:25: warning: variable 'byte_reset_it' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
703 | volatile unsigned char byte_reset_it;
| ^
4 warnings generated.
--
In file included from drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:11:
In file included from drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/dma/edma.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/dmaengine.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:1719:
include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:13:
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:37:4: warning: field sar within 'struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:31:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
37 | } sar;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:44:4: warning: field dar within 'struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:38:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
44 | } dar;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:51:4: warning: field llp within 'struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:45:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
51 | } llp;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:172:4: warning: field rd_err_status within 'struct dw_edma_v0_regs' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:166:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_regs' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
172 | } rd_err_status;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:182:4: warning: field rd_done_imwr within 'struct dw_edma_v0_regs' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:176:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_regs' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
182 | } rd_done_imwr;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:189:4: warning: field rd_abort_imwr within 'struct dw_edma_v0_regs' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:183:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_regs' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
189 | } rd_abort_imwr;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:71:4: warning: field wr_engine_hshake_cnt within 'struct dw_edma_v0_unroll' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:65:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_unroll' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
71 | } wr_engine_hshake_cnt;
| ^
>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:79:4: warning: field rd_engine_hshake_cnt within 'struct dw_edma_v0_unroll' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-regs.h:73:2)' and is usually due to 'struct dw_edma_v0_unroll' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Wunaligned-access]
79 | } rd_engine_hshake_cnt;
| ^
9 warnings generated.
--
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:36:
In file included from include/linux/vga_switcheroo.h:34:
In file included from include/linux/fb.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/kgdb.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/kprobes.h:28:
In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/kallsyms.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:1719:
include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:3:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
3 | {0x1002, 0x1304, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:4:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
4 | {0x1002, 0x1305, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:5:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
5 | {0x1002, 0x1306, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:6:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
6 | {0x1002, 0x1307, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:7:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
7 | {0x1002, 0x1309, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:8:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
8 | {0x1002, 0x130A, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:9:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
9 | {0x1002, 0x130B, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:10:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
10 | {0x1002, 0x130C, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:11:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
11 | {0x1002, 0x130D, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:12:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
12 | {0x1002, 0x130E, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:13:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
13 | {0x1002, 0x130F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:14:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
14 | {0x1002, 0x1310, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:15:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
15 | {0x1002, 0x1311, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:16:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
16 | {0x1002, 0x1312, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:17:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
17 | {0x1002, 0x1313, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:18:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
18 | {0x1002, 0x1315, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:19:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
19 | {0x1002, 0x1316, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:20:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
20 | {0x1002, 0x1317, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:21:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
21 | {0x1002, 0x1318, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:22:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
22 | {0x1002, 0x131B, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:23:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
23 | {0x1002, 0x131C, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:24:60: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
24 | {0x1002, 0x131D, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_KAVERI|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:25:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
25 | {0x1002, 0x3150, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:26:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
26 | {0x1002, 0x3151, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:27:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
27 | {0x1002, 0x3152, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:28:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
28 | {0x1002, 0x3154, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:29:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
29 | {0x1002, 0x3155, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:30:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
30 | {0x1002, 0x3E50, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:31:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
31 | {0x1002, 0x3E54, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RV380|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:32:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
32 | {0x1002, 0x4136, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RS100|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:33:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
33 | {0x1002, 0x4137, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RS200|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:49:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
49 | {0x1002, 0x4237, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RS200|RADEON_IS_IGP}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:51:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
51 | {0x1002, 0x4336, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RS100|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:52:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
52 | {0x1002, 0x4337, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RS200|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:53:59: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
53 | {0x1002, 0x4437, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_RS200|RADEON_IS_IGP|RADEON_IS_MOBILITY}, \
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c:284:2: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum radeon_family' and 'enum radeon_chip_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
284 | radeon_PCI_IDS
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_pciids.h:56:58: note: expanded from macro 'radeon_PCI_IDS'
56 | {0x1002, 0x4A48, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_R420|RADEON_NEW_MEMMAP}, \
--
>> drivers/ntb/msi.c:33: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'desc_changed' not described in 'ntb_msi_init'
--
In file included from drivers/rapidio/rio_cm.c:12:
In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:1719:
include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> drivers/rapidio/rio_cm.c:673:7: warning: variable 'rc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
673 | int rc;
| ^
2 warnings generated.
--
>> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c:77: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'dsp_reset' not described in 'da8xx_rproc'
>> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c:86: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'irq' not described in 'handle_event'
>> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c:86: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'p' not described in 'handle_event'
>> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c:106: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'irq' not described in 'da8xx_rproc_callback'
>> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c:106: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'p' not described in 'da8xx_rproc_callback'
..
vim +/byte_reset_it +131 drivers/char/applicom.c
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 127
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 128 static int ac_register_board(unsigned long physloc, void __iomem *loc,
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 129 unsigned char boardno)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 130 {
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @131 volatile unsigned char byte_reset_it;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 132
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 133 if((readb(loc + CONF_END_TEST) != 0x00) ||
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 134 (readb(loc + CONF_END_TEST + 1) != 0x55) ||
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 135 (readb(loc + CONF_END_TEST + 2) != 0xAA) ||
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 136 (readb(loc + CONF_END_TEST + 3) != 0xFF))
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 137 return 0;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 138
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 139 if (!boardno)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 140 boardno = readb(loc + NUMCARD_OWNER_TO_PC);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 141
e60b6e2f747e94 Eric Sesterhenn 2006-04-10 142 if (!boardno || boardno > MAX_BOARD) {
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 143 printk(KERN_WARNING "Board #%d (at 0x%lx) is out of range (1 <= x <= %d).\n",
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 144 boardno, physloc, MAX_BOARD);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 145 return 0;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 146 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 147
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 148 if (apbs[boardno - 1].RamIO) {
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 149 printk(KERN_WARNING "Board #%d (at 0x%lx) conflicts with previous board #%d (at 0x%lx)\n",
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 150 boardno, physloc, boardno, apbs[boardno-1].PhysIO);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 151 return 0;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 152 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 153
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 154 boardno--;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 155
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 156 apbs[boardno].PhysIO = physloc;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 157 apbs[boardno].RamIO = loc;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 158 init_waitqueue_head(&apbs[boardno].FlagSleepSend);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 159 spin_lock_init(&apbs[boardno].mutex);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 160 byte_reset_it = readb(loc + RAM_IT_TO_PC);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 161
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 162 numboards++;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 163 return boardno + 1;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 164 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 165
:::::: The code at line 131 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
:::::: TO: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
:::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-08 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-08 8:42 kernel test robot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-21 3:54 drivers/char/applicom.c:131:25: warning: variable 'byte_reset_it' set but not used kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202502081611.XAQNNgvR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.