From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during rtnetlink operations
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:06:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502112254.DdkYlmMx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210192043.439074-5-sdf@fomichev.me>
Hi Stanislav,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Stanislav-Fomichev/net-hold-netdev-instance-lock-during-ndo_open-ndo_stop/20250211-032336
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210192043.439074-5-sdf%40fomichev.me
patch subject: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during rtnetlink operations
config: arc-randconfig-001-20250211 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250211/202502112254.DdkYlmMx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250211/202502112254.DdkYlmMx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502112254.DdkYlmMx-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/core/dev.c: In function 'dev_set_mtu':
net/core/dev.c:9320:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'netdev_set_mtu_ext_locked'; did you mean 'netdev_ops_assert_locked'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
9320 | err = netdev_set_mtu_ext_locked(dev, new_mtu, &extack);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| netdev_ops_assert_locked
net/core/dev.c: At top level:
>> net/core/dev.c:11390:12: warning: 'netdev_lock_cmp_fn' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
11390 | static int netdev_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a, const struct lockdep_map *b)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
>> net/core/dev_api.c:109: warning: Excess function parameter 'new_ifindex' description in 'dev_change_net_namespace'
vim +/netdev_lock_cmp_fn +11390 net/core/dev.c
11389
11390 static int netdev_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a, const struct lockdep_map *b)
11391 {
11392 /* Only lower devices currently grab the instance lock, so no
11393 * real ordering issues can occur. In the near future, only
11394 * hardware devices will grab instance lock which also does not
11395 * involve any ordering. Suppress lockdep ordering warnings
11396 * until (if) we start grabbing instance lock on pure SW
11397 * devices (bond/team/etc).
11398 */
11399 return -1;
11400 }
11401
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 19:20 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Hold netdev instance lock during ndo operations Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during ndo_open/ndo_stop Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-12 2:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during ndo_setup_tc Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-12 2:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-12 3:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-12 3:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during queue operations Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-12 2:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during rtnetlink operations Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-11 15:06 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-02-11 16:32 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-12 2:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during ioctl operations Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during sysfs operations Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] net: hold netdev instance lock during ndo_bpf Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: ethtool: try to protect all callback with netdev instance lock Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: dummy: add dummy shaper API Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-11 10:41 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-11 15:29 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] docs: net: document new locking reality Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-10 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] eth: bnxt: remove most dependencies on RTNL Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202502112254.DdkYlmMx-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.