All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
To: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, <jlayton@kernel.org>, <neilb@suse.de>,
	<okorniev@redhat.com>, <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, <tom@talpey.com>,
	<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, <houtao1@huawei.com>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com>, <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: put dl_stid if fail to queue dl_recall
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:25:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213072536.69986-1-lilingfeng3@huawei.com> (raw)

Before calling nfsd4_run_cb to queue dl_recall to the callback_wq, we
increment the reference count of dl_stid.
We expect that after the corresponding work_struct is processed, the
reference count of dl_stid will be decremented through the callback
function nfsd4_cb_recall_release.
However, if the call to nfsd4_run_cb fails, the incremented reference
count of dl_stid will not be decremented correspondingly, leading to the
following nfs4_stid leak:
unreferenced object 0xffff88812067b578 (size 344):
  comm "nfsd", pid 2761, jiffies 4295044002 (age 5541.241s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 6b 6b 6b 6b b8 02 c0 e2 81 88 ff ff  ....kkkk........
    00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de  .kkkkkkk.....N..
  backtrace:
    kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b9/0x700
    nfsd4_process_open1+0x34/0x300
    nfsd4_open+0x2d1/0x9d0
    nfsd4_proc_compound+0x7a2/0xe30
    nfsd_dispatch+0x241/0x3e0
    svc_process_common+0x5d3/0xcc0
    svc_process+0x2a3/0x320
    nfsd+0x180/0x2e0
    kthread+0x199/0x1d0
    ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xffff8881499f4d28 (size 368):
  comm "nfsd", pid 2761, jiffies 4295044005 (age 5541.239s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30 4d 9f 49 81 88 ff ff  ........0M.I....
    30 4d 9f 49 81 88 ff ff 20 00 00 00 01 00 00 00  0M.I.... .......
  backtrace:
    kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b9/0x700
    nfs4_alloc_stid+0x29/0x210
    alloc_init_deleg+0x92/0x2e0
    nfs4_set_delegation+0x284/0xc00
    nfs4_open_delegation+0x216/0x3f0
    nfsd4_process_open2+0x2b3/0xee0
    nfsd4_open+0x770/0x9d0
    nfsd4_proc_compound+0x7a2/0xe30
    nfsd_dispatch+0x241/0x3e0
    svc_process_common+0x5d3/0xcc0
    svc_process+0x2a3/0x320
    nfsd+0x180/0x2e0
    kthread+0x199/0x1d0
    ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
Fix it by checking the result of nfsd4_run_cb and call nfs4_put_stid if
fail to queue dl_recall.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 153eeea2c7c9..0ccb87be47b7 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5414,6 +5414,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_recall_ops = {
 
 static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
 {
+	bool queued;
 	/*
 	 * We're assuming the state code never drops its reference
 	 * without first removing the lease.  Since we're in this lease
@@ -5422,7 +5423,10 @@ static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
 	 * we know it's safe to take a reference.
 	 */
 	refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!nfsd4_run_cb(&dp->dl_recall));
+	queued = nfsd4_run_cb(&dp->dl_recall);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!queued);
+	if (!queued)
+		nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
 }
 
 /* Called from break_lease() with flc_lock held. */
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13  7:25 Li Lingfeng [this message]
2025-02-13 11:49 ` [PATCH] nfsd: put dl_stid if fail to queue dl_recall Jeff Layton
2025-02-13 12:28   ` Li Lingfeng
2025-02-13 12:34     ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-13 14:21       ` Li Lingfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250213072536.69986-1-lilingfeng3@huawei.com \
    --to=lilingfeng3@huawei.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.