From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9E51552FA; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739458827; cv=none; b=t0QmvkFGvOGummraeZ9/e1u+RKJFRKuxG9mxGDhGtLdC7vPrqXFiVGFso83PeOJix2ZlVkh/YsSfLJcX8+sIItki2iHrZnBWDfSldMxearsu/ZimVl5pe0ATeo1UKYj3d7s6qkLz/uDOITrFiFDH10yTWlcLQkVRyRoY6KyiZX4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739458827; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LBi7P3KR2BZfpqZf2qcBJKNX4mwOWX3wLaGk0F3dEX8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ssrlhyDJkwQoaoMzgu6yFtrLufEqlLgvZPI3wuQh6g3pZFhyHNvWwKU+TMFmthf9g7FnaANlp4WWVea9UK77gUisMxVZ9grv9jByXlZEjj2GJaqS28mFpVW74AZPPq9W6WUsbHmt6r9+YN3hwP1VI6VMOaHvRge11ury1U3Z+fo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Njs8DB0Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Njs8DB0Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 641A8C4CED1; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:00:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1739458826; bh=LBi7P3KR2BZfpqZf2qcBJKNX4mwOWX3wLaGk0F3dEX8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Njs8DB0QjrwHbunMoCwUOK4dEJqlvLlTZbTlVdFmEKLbK3EJcl0SiUh9vGMFxFioV 4+GBqRpTuZpCfwzhseWeT1+bVvL/VdY+LKs3M7eoFeRLs1cT07WGU7k2YL/F0Lfw7a EESBP9vdgwNMcBUfDEYr1LN+U/4grKjHO+6Eg220= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.13 088/443] bpf: Improve verifier log for resource leak on exit Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:24:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20250213142444.006358017@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <20250213142440.609878115@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20250213142440.609878115@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.68 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [ Upstream commit cbd8730aea8d79cda6b0f3c18b406dfdef0c1b80 ] The verifier log when leaking resources on BPF_EXIT may be a bit confusing, as it's a problem only when finally existing from the main prog, not from any of the subprogs. Hence, update the verifier error string and the corresponding selftests matching on it. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204030400.208005-6-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c | 4 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c | 14 +++++++------- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 77f56674aaa99..4f02345b764fd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -18803,7 +18803,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * match caller reference state when it exits. */ err = check_resource_leak(env, exception_exit, !env->cur_state->curframe, - "BPF_EXIT instruction"); + "BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog"); if (err) return err; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c index fe0f3fa5aab68..8a0fdff899271 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ int reject_subprog_with_lock(void *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region") int reject_with_rcu_read_lock(void *ctx) { bpf_rcu_read_lock(); @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ __noinline static int throwing_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region") int reject_subprog_with_rcu_read_lock(void *ctx) { bpf_rcu_read_lock(); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c index 885377e836077..5269571cf7b57 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ #include "bpf_experimental.h" SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { bpf_preempt_disable(); @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ int preempt_lock_missing_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { bpf_preempt_disable(); @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int preempt_lock_missing_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_3(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { bpf_preempt_disable(); @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int preempt_lock_missing_3(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_3_minus_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { bpf_preempt_disable(); @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static __noinline void preempt_enable(void) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_1_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { preempt_disable(); @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int preempt_lock_missing_1_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_2_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { preempt_disable(); @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ int preempt_lock_missing_2_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_preempt_disable-ed region") int preempt_lock_missing_2_minus_1_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { preempt_disable(); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c index 3f679de73229f..25599eac9a702 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ l0_%=: r6 = r0; \ SEC("cgroup/skb") __description("spin_lock: test6 missing unlock") -__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction cannot be used inside bpf_spin_lock-ed region") +__failure __msg("BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog cannot be used inside bpf_spin_lock-ed region") __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("") __naked void spin_lock_test6_missing_unlock(void) { -- 2.39.5