From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Ian May <ianm@nvidia.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] sched_ext: idle: Per-node idle cpumasks
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:57:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502131834.ni8ojoRO-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212165006.490130-7-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hi Andrea,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20250212]
[cannot apply to tip/sched/core akpm-mm/mm-everything tip/master linus/master tip/auto-latest v6.14-rc2 v6.14-rc1 v6.13 v6.14-rc2]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrea-Righi/mm-numa-Introduce-nearest_node_nodemask/20250213-014857
base: next-20250212
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250212165006.490130-7-arighi%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH 6/7] sched_ext: idle: Per-node idle cpumasks
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-005-20250213 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250213/202502131834.ni8ojoRO-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250213/202502131834.ni8ojoRO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502131834.ni8ojoRO-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:63:
kernel/sched/ext.c:6014:31: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum scx_enq_flags' and 'enum scx_deq_flags') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
6014 | WRITE_ONCE(v, SCX_ENQ_WAKEUP | SCX_DEQ_SLEEP | SCX_KICK_PREEMPT |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:61:18: note: expanded from macro 'WRITE_ONCE'
61 | __WRITE_ONCE(x, val); \
| ^~~
include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:55:33: note: expanded from macro '__WRITE_ONCE'
55 | *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \
| ^~~
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:64:
>> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:9: error: '__section__' attribute only applies to functions, global variables, Objective-C methods, and Objective-C properties
136 | static DEFINE_PER_CPU(nodemask_t, per_cpu_unvisited);
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
115 | DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:93:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
93 | __PCPU_DUMMY_ATTRS char __pcpu_unique_##name; \
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:54:2: note: expanded from macro '__PCPU_DUMMY_ATTRS'
54 | __section(".discard") __attribute__((unused))
| ^
include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:321:56: note: expanded from macro '__section'
321 | #define __section(section) __attribute__((__section__(section)))
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:64:
>> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:9: error: non-extern declaration of '__pcpu_unique_per_cpu_unvisited' follows extern declaration
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
115 | DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:93:26: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
93 | __PCPU_DUMMY_ATTRS char __pcpu_unique_##name; \
| ^
<scratch space>:82:1: note: expanded from here
82 | __pcpu_unique_per_cpu_unvisited
| ^
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:9: note: previous declaration is here
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
115 | DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:92:33: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
92 | extern __PCPU_DUMMY_ATTRS char __pcpu_unique_##name; \
| ^
<scratch space>:81:1: note: expanded from here
81 | __pcpu_unique_per_cpu_unvisited
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:64:
>> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:9: error: 'section' attribute only applies to functions, global variables, Objective-C methods, and Objective-C properties
136 | static DEFINE_PER_CPU(nodemask_t, per_cpu_unvisited);
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
115 | DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:95:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
95 | __PCPU_ATTRS(sec) __weak __typeof__(type) name
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:50:26: note: expanded from macro '__PCPU_ATTRS'
50 | __percpu __attribute__((section(PER_CPU_BASE_SECTION sec))) \
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:64:
>> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:36: error: non-extern declaration of 'per_cpu_unvisited' follows extern declaration
136 | static DEFINE_PER_CPU(nodemask_t, per_cpu_unvisited);
| ^
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:36: note: previous declaration is here
>> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c:136:9: error: weak declaration cannot have internal linkage
136 | static DEFINE_PER_CPU(nodemask_t, per_cpu_unvisited);
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
115 | DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:95:20: note: expanded from macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
95 | __PCPU_ATTRS(sec) __weak __typeof__(type) name
| ^
include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:403:56: note: expanded from macro '__weak'
403 | #define __weak __attribute__((__weak__))
| ^
1 warning and 5 errors generated.
vim +/__section__ +136 kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
133
134 static s32 pick_idle_cpu_from_other_nodes(const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, int node, u64 flags)
135 {
> 136 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(nodemask_t, per_cpu_unvisited);
137 nodemask_t *unvisited = this_cpu_ptr(&per_cpu_unvisited);
138 s32 cpu = -EBUSY;
139
140 preempt_disable();
141 unvisited = this_cpu_ptr(&per_cpu_unvisited);
142
143 /*
144 * Restrict the search to the online nodes, excluding the current
145 * one.
146 */
147 nodes_clear(*unvisited);
148 nodes_or(*unvisited, *unvisited, node_states[N_ONLINE]);
149 node_clear(node, *unvisited);
150
151 /*
152 * Traverse all nodes in order of increasing distance, starting
153 * from @node.
154 *
155 * This loop is O(N^2), with N being the amount of NUMA nodes,
156 * which might be quite expensive in large NUMA systems. However,
157 * this complexity comes into play only when a scheduler enables
158 * SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE and it's requesting an idle CPU
159 * without specifying a target NUMA node, so it shouldn't be a
160 * bottleneck is most cases.
161 *
162 * As a future optimization we may want to cache the list of nodes
163 * in a per-node array, instead of actually traversing them every
164 * time.
165 */
166 for_each_node_numadist(node, *unvisited) {
167 cpu = pick_idle_cpu_in_node(cpus_allowed, node, flags);
168 if (cpu >= 0)
169 break;
170 }
171 preempt_enable();
172
173 return cpu;
174 }
175
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 16:48 [PATCHSET v11 sched_ext/for-6.15] sched_ext: split global idle cpumask into per-NUMA cpumasks Andrea Righi
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] nodemask: numa: reorganize inclusion path Andrea Righi
2025-02-13 15:29 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-13 15:59 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/numa: Introduce nearest_node_nodemask() Andrea Righi
2025-02-13 15:57 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-13 16:19 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-13 17:12 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-14 8:55 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-14 16:04 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_node_numadist() iterator Andrea Righi
2025-02-13 16:02 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-13 16:32 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched_ext: idle: Make idle static keys private Andrea Righi
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched_ext: idle: Introduce SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE Andrea Righi
2025-02-13 16:08 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-13 16:22 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched_ext: idle: Per-node idle cpumasks Andrea Righi
2025-02-13 10:57 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-02-13 18:03 ` Yury Norov
2025-02-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched_ext: idle: Introduce node-aware idle cpu kfunc helpers Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202502131834.ni8ojoRO-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ianm@nvidia.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.