From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1] selftests/bpf: Fix stdout race condition in traffic monitor
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:32:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213233217.553258-1-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
Fix a race condition between the main test_progs thread and the traffic
monitoring thread. The traffic monitor thread tries to print a line
using multiple printf and use flockfile() to prevent the line from being
torn apart. Meanwhile, the main thread doing io redirection can reassign
or close stdout when going through tests. A deadlock as shown below can
happen.
main traffic_monitor_thread
==== ======================
show_transport()
-> flockfile(stdout)
stdio_hijack_init()
-> stdout = open_memstream(log_buf, log_cnt);
...
env.subtest_state->stdout_saved = stdout;
...
funlockfile(stdout)
stdio_restore_cleanup()
-> fclose(env.subtest_state->stdout_saved);
After the traffic monitor thread lock stdout, A new memstream can be
assigned to stdout by the main thread. Therefore, the traffic monitor
thread later will not be able to unlock the original stdout. As the
main thread tries to access the old stdout, it will hang indefinitely
as it is still locked by the traffic monitor thread.
The deadlock can be reproduced by running test_progs repeatedly with
traffic monitor enabled:
for ((i=1;i<=100;i++)); do
./test_progs -a flow_dissector_skb* -m '*'
done
Fix this by only calling printf once and remove flockfile()/funlockfile().
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c | 33 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
index 80844a5fb1fe..95e943270f35 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
@@ -771,12 +771,13 @@ static const char *pkt_type_str(u16 pkt_type)
return "Unknown";
}
+#define MAX_FLAGS_STRLEN 21
/* Show the information of the transport layer in the packet */
static void show_transport(const u_char *packet, u16 len, u32 ifindex,
const char *src_addr, const char *dst_addr,
u16 proto, bool ipv6, u8 pkt_type)
{
- char *ifname, _ifname[IF_NAMESIZE];
+ char *ifname, _ifname[IF_NAMESIZE], flags[MAX_FLAGS_STRLEN] = "";
const char *transport_str;
u16 src_port, dst_port;
struct udphdr *udp;
@@ -817,29 +818,21 @@ static void show_transport(const u_char *packet, u16 len, u32 ifindex,
/* TCP or UDP*/
- flockfile(stdout);
+ if (proto == IPPROTO_TCP)
+ snprintf(flags, MAX_FLAGS_STRLEN, "%s%s%s%s",
+ tcp->fin ? ", FIN" : "",
+ tcp->syn ? ", SYN" : "",
+ tcp->rst ? ", RST" : "",
+ tcp->ack ? ", ACK" : "");
+
if (ipv6)
- printf("%-7s %-3s IPv6 %s.%d > %s.%d: %s, length %d",
+ printf("%-7s %-3s IPv6 %s.%d > %s.%d: %s, length %d%s\n",
ifname, pkt_type_str(pkt_type), src_addr, src_port,
- dst_addr, dst_port, transport_str, len);
+ dst_addr, dst_port, transport_str, len, flags);
else
- printf("%-7s %-3s IPv4 %s:%d > %s:%d: %s, length %d",
+ printf("%-7s %-3s IPv4 %s:%d > %s:%d: %s, length %d%s\n",
ifname, pkt_type_str(pkt_type), src_addr, src_port,
- dst_addr, dst_port, transport_str, len);
-
- if (proto == IPPROTO_TCP) {
- if (tcp->fin)
- printf(", FIN");
- if (tcp->syn)
- printf(", SYN");
- if (tcp->rst)
- printf(", RST");
- if (tcp->ack)
- printf(", ACK");
- }
-
- printf("\n");
- funlockfile(stdout);
+ dst_addr, dst_port, transport_str, len, flags);
}
static void show_ipv6_packet(const u_char *packet, u32 ifindex, u8 pkt_type)
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 23:32 Amery Hung [this message]
2025-02-13 23:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1] selftests/bpf: Fix stdout race condition in traffic monitor Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-14 0:19 ` Amery Hung
2025-02-14 1:08 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-14 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250213233217.553258-1-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.