From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Doug Covelli <doug.covelli@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Set RFLAGS.IF=1 in C code, to get VMRUN out of the STI shadow
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:09:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250215010946.1201353-2-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250215010946.1201353-1-seanjc@google.com>
Enable/disable local IRQs, i.e. set/clear RFLAGS.IF, in the common
svm_vcpu_enter_exit() just after/before guest_state_{enter,exit}_irqoff()
so that VMRUN is not executed in an STI shadow. AMD CPUs have a quirk
(some would say "bug"), where the STI shadow bleeds into the guest's
intr_state field if a #VMEXIT occurs during injection of an event, i.e. if
the VMRUN doesn't complete before the subsequent #VMEXIT.
The spurious "interrupts masked" state is relatively benign, as it only
occurs during event injection and is transient. Because KVM is already
injecting an event, the guest can't be in HLT, and if KVM is querying IRQ
blocking for injection, then KVM would need to force an immediate exit
anyways since injecting multiple events is impossible.
However, because KVM copies int_state verbatim from vmcb02 to vmcb12, the
spurious STI shadow is visible to L1 when running a nested VM, which can
trip sanity checks, e.g. in VMware's VMM.
Hoist the STI+CLI all the way to C code, as the aforementioned calls to
guest_state_{enter,exit}_irqoff() already inform lockdep that IRQs are
enabled/disabled, and taking a fault on VMRUN with RFLAGS.IF=1 is already
possible. I.e. if there's kernel code that is confused by running with
RFLAGS.IF=1, then it's already a problem. In practice, since GIF=0 also
blocks NMIs, the only change in exposure to non-KVM code (relative to
surrounding VMRUN with STI+CLI) is exception handling code, and except for
the kvm_rebooting=1 case, all exception in the core VM-Enter/VM-Exit path
are fatal.
Oppurtunstically document why KVM needs to do STI in the first place.
Reported-by: Doug Covelli <doug.covelli@broadcom.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADH9ctBs1YPmE4aCfGPNBwA10cA8RuAk2gO7542DjMZgs4uzJQ@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: f14eec0a3203 ("KVM: SVM: move more vmentry code to assembly")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S | 10 +---------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 7640a84e554a..fa0687711c48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4189,6 +4189,18 @@ static noinstr void svm_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool spec_ctrl_in
guest_state_enter_irqoff();
+ /*
+ * Set RFLAGS.IF prior to VMRUN, as the host's RFLAGS.IF at the time of
+ * VMRUN controls whether or not physical IRQs are masked (KVM always
+ * runs with V_INTR_MASKING_MASK). Toggle RFLAGS.IF here to avoid the
+ * temptation to do STI+VMRUN+CLI, as AMD CPUs bleed the STI shadow
+ * into guest state if delivery of an event during VMRUN triggers a
+ * #VMEXIT, and the guest_state transitions already tell lockdep that
+ * IRQs are being enabled/disabled. Note! GIF=0 for the entirety of
+ * this path, so IRQs aren't actually unmasked while running host code.
+ */
+ local_irq_enable();
+
amd_clear_divider();
if (sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
@@ -4197,6 +4209,8 @@ static noinstr void svm_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool spec_ctrl_in
else
__svm_vcpu_run(svm, spec_ctrl_intercepted);
+ local_irq_disable();
+
guest_state_exit_irqoff();
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
index 2ed80aea3bb1..0c61153b275f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
@@ -170,12 +170,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run)
mov VCPU_RDI(%_ASM_DI), %_ASM_DI
/* Enter guest mode */
- sti
-
3: vmrun %_ASM_AX
4:
- cli
-
/* Pop @svm to RAX while it's the only available register. */
pop %_ASM_AX
@@ -340,12 +336,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_sev_es_vcpu_run)
mov KVM_VMCB_pa(%rax), %rax
/* Enter guest mode */
- sti
-
1: vmrun %rax
-
-2: cli
-
+2:
/* IMPORTANT: Stuff the RSB immediately after VM-Exit, before RET! */
FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %rax, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT
--
2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-15 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-15 1:09 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SVM: Fix an STI shadow on VMRUN bug Sean Christopherson
2025-02-15 1:09 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-20 1:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Set RFLAGS.IF=1 in C code, to get VMRUN out of the STI shadow Sean Christopherson
2025-02-15 1:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Assert that STI blocking isn't set after event injection Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250215010946.1201353-2-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=doug.covelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.