From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F497E0E4 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 02:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739847308; cv=none; b=ij8r0Iun7sKD3z01+cMotjyjMuyo+JSApCl54it8hPiMb+UoOx3+ijX5mS7hRpfk/dsuBRD6+ooGw6+pl3/OPJy0gJYFNADw9o512xLcnZs4xtRI40OOPWEW4PD93WvDU+3sy9N4Y0+hgMV/K9iTVzxTW77wxi/v7YASgedk7ac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739847308; c=relaxed/simple; bh=51wf1vQcwtYGqAkOb9ELsKdcga09UkRW47uDzzWrt8s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VgewiTESe3Pj51gmhreqc4fqD1wiGw+3a+T8h0TT1WNNhKOqlQTMxg5q9pPFQvBEEzopi22+JI57FTLgL8rfoGZnTB3P1vyOhr7zhVJSR59oRJAMX9Mzhj5FIs/LaoYN8+PXk7JFHFYL9yn4GdfFNqQxXIQ+0PigUC2KXeV7Ht4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DvmG8rZc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DvmG8rZc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739847307; x=1771383307; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=51wf1vQcwtYGqAkOb9ELsKdcga09UkRW47uDzzWrt8s=; b=DvmG8rZceT/9UpEOdlJZ79vY7XMyIjIJ+/aIAyEvZta1I4hMBu2yGAzI AEoBBenTRa78wXLMJZAe8GwifegBdhwaE+uqKETQ/nKk/s/V6Edxz8qZd yz1EqN0HnPcpsLxrltBf4pLl4AL9RDqMVAT1FOTtYyxN8Vp2cASAayaVf BWfc43VK+jGDUOx2aIG+91XvuyH5SHNL6qoPezBGNrPdIjsf/clV643TU D0qHfJ61tevA1v6uVh/XtAg30XhvYRuvPjVuj1fKoYTsKPbB/vACrdWCZ BPjn91c3O4XoDXe5d3IYYesao7j4CGU/qNGqdAPyD0Dy6EmLmRz6lZO7u Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: V2fJJ4pXQjKV8jHTzFpC6g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: x0vr/YQYSrmrWyPjRt7Hww== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11314"; a="51960526" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,310,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="51960526" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2025 18:55:06 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nic+9FyRQJak/sQvANB4sw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: h/r+3JEXRk6sA9LGeDoOVQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="151459567" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 76cde6cc1f07) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2025 18:55:05 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 76cde6cc1f07 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tkDlG-00005v-2n; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 02:55:02 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:53:25 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Eugen Hristev Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] pstore: implement core area registration Message-ID: <202502181022.PsKoqf9f-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250217101706.2104498-6-eugen.hristev@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250217101706.2104498-6-eugen.hristev@linaro.org> Hi Eugen, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on kees/for-next/pstore] [also build test WARNING on kees/for-next/kspp driver-core/driver-core-testing driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master herbert-crypto-2.6/master linus/master v6.14-rc3 next-20250217] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eugen-Hristev/pstore-zone-move-pstore_device_info-into-zone-header/20250217-182615 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/pstore patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250217101706.2104498-6-eugen.hristev%40linaro.org patch subject: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] pstore: implement core area registration config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250218 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250218/202502181022.PsKoqf9f-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250218/202502181022.PsKoqf9f-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502181022.PsKoqf9f-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/pstore/platform.c: In function 'pstore_unregister_core_area': >> fs/pstore/platform.c:316:13: warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 316 | int ret; | ^~~ -- >> fs/pstore/zone.c:40: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'data_ptr' not described in 'psz_buffer' fs/pstore/zone.c:142: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'dmszs' not described in 'psz_context' fs/pstore/zone.c:142: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'dmapped_max_cnt' not described in 'psz_context' vim +/ret +316 fs/pstore/platform.c 312 313 int pstore_unregister_core_area(const char *handle, void *area, size_t size) 314 { 315 struct rec_list_t *rec_element, *tmp; > 316 int ret; 317 318 if (!psinfo || !psinfo->unregister_dmr) 319 return -EAGAIN; 320 321 mutex_lock(&ps_dmr_lock); 322 list_for_each_entry_safe(rec_element, tmp, &rec_list, list) { 323 struct pstore_record *record; 324 325 record = &rec_element->rec; 326 327 if (record->buf == area) { 328 ret = psinfo->unregister_dmr(record); 329 list_del(&rec_element->list); 330 mutex_unlock(&ps_dmr_lock); 331 return 0; 332 } 333 } 334 335 mutex_unlock(&ps_dmr_lock); 336 return 0; 337 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki