All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: Fix fprobe with function graph accounting
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:52:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220115258.7558Aa9-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219220436.498041541@goodmis.org>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 05:04:36PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Heiko Carstens reported[1] a bug when running the ftrace selftests.
> After running them, he noticed that the enabled_functions file had
> all functions enabled in it. That means something was registered to
> ftrace that shouldn't be.
> 
> The issue was with the accounting of the new fprobe logic which was
> built on top of the function graph infrastructure. Patch 3 of this
> series is the fix for that bug, but while debugging that, 3 other
> accounting bugs were discovered.
...
> Steven Rostedt (5):
>       ftrace: Fix accounting of adding subops to a manager ops
>       ftrace: Do not add duplicate entries in subops manager ops
>       fprobe: Always unregister fgraph function from ops
>       fprobe: Fix accounting of when to unregister from function graph
>       selftests/ftrace: Update fprobe test to check enabled_functions file
> 
> ----
>  kernel/trace/fprobe.c                              | 12 ++---
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c                              | 33 +++++++++----
>  .../ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc    | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

FWIW, I can confirm that this fixes the bug I reported.
Feel free to add

Tested-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 22:04 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: Fix fprobe with function graph accounting Steven Rostedt
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ftrace: Fix accounting of adding subops to a manager ops Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  6:58   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-20 20:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ftrace: Do not add duplicate entries in subops " Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  6:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fprobe: Always unregister fgraph function from ops Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  4:41   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fprobe: Fix accounting of when to unregister from function graph Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  4:42   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] selftests/ftrace: Update fprobe test to check enabled_functions file Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20 11:52 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220115258.7558Aa9-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.