From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6603E270026 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 05:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740633321; cv=none; b=pzD6Sct/O6wux5jip8tCaw17GbcgO5lHZwfF/1n7gxJm4ICxBF2Gn4fY6IqUgX6AI3eejvYRksb/cdeVH9ZYp62bZYuHD9XgX04+9CDiaLTZUWmJlXHsFScxWYogFKWiO3sD9EH0v5h02ZPgvwtnwXYqnHymdsAwwmJDwOBJIwk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740633321; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Uwmrl+1S0SHW5qTEFMHOYvQXcCHiR8luylF2Z/RlQqI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YvufkZHlIwk0FGOr7yh0o6QuL1tu1J4lOYZVaekvqlHvS6WS+O8LHmUO6NwvRJN+sNQVc6MHVMoMW39Xdwx0lq+QKHOEk+TpCj5Gcdig47jCv4bKO8Pfn3QekNnx4f1+P+I1x7R2IdAb9sytnleJPDp7nu/RtlRYYBKQ8M5AWTM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=BCfo3HIP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="BCfo3HIP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1740633320; x=1772169320; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Uwmrl+1S0SHW5qTEFMHOYvQXcCHiR8luylF2Z/RlQqI=; b=BCfo3HIPJWaqumqN3qhxwQgEnXNTNIj70cxu0i4kUZEbhBkeXtdMsuPX UdFfDl5ukmzwN3EM2pMHTMY656y2bfCiW1V33OEwGge3TbhYbI6cWWN0e 4LP6z+siXJMPnH/HaqSpqiGSOYUAzKnYlB8Om3MpSdlT6FFZqAqb3MO5g 58m2SjSqvkvjOdh8+nK3CW58WFy+Imt2nZ/gCgauk1JLya3HD0SgTUQEn p1rLf/ejTGoAmWrFeyOm4V1eFQBU6fPNVGk/JouXIiKyRdW77TMTOVASd zPKSSFT0OhMTo4x0TA11FGy2o6hW+q/uoTOHc3W9eP3fcse0+ohjS/ki8 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MRpkwDU4Q1WjDa1fzPHOPw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PgJ/5Lt0Q8uKWr6BpCPqfw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11314"; a="41707759" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,310,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="41707759" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2025 21:15:18 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OTpZKtnmQMmmRZ6REjSwuw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pZY1eDfFQ7ylcf7NTa8SCA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="147838913" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 76cde6cc1f07) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2025 21:15:15 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 76cde6cc1f07 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tnWEo-000Csg-1O; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 05:15:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:14:59 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jonathan Cavitt , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, saurabhg.gupta@intel.com, alex.zuo@intel.com, jonathan.cavitt@intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, jianxun.zhang@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl Message-ID: <202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250226225557.133076-7-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250226225557.133076-7-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> Hi Jonathan, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20250226] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.14-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jonathan-Cavitt/drm-xe-xe_gt_pagefault-Migrate-lookup_vma-to-xe_vm-h/20250227-070008 base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git drm-xe-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226225557.133076-7-jonathan.cavitt%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250227 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250227/202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250227/202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c: In function 'xe_pagefault_access_type_to_address_type': >> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3288:9: error: 'vma' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'vm'? 3288 | vma = lookup_vma(vm, pf->page_addr); | ^~~ | vm drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3288:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3288:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'lookup_vma' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 3288 | vma = lookup_vma(vm, pf->page_addr); | ^~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +3288 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c 3281 3282 static enum drm_xe_fault_address_type 3283 xe_pagefault_access_type_to_address_type(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_pagefault *pf) 3284 { 3285 if (!pf) 3286 return 0; 3287 > 3288 vma = lookup_vma(vm, pf->page_addr); 3289 if (!vma) 3290 return DRM_XE_FAULT_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE_EXT; 3291 if (xe_vma_read_only(vma) && pf->access_type != XE_PAGEFAULT_ACCESS_TYPE_READ) 3292 return DRM_XE_FAULT_ADDRESS_TYPE_WRITE_INVALID_EXT; 3293 return 0; 3294 } 3295 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki