All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/9] mm/damon/core: set damos_filter default allowance behavior based on installed filters
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:48:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250228044845.37918-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250227055054.22813-1-sj@kernel.org>

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 21:50:54 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:57:52 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Decide whether to allow or reject by default on core and opertions layer
> > handled filters evaluation stages.  It is decided as the opposite of the
> > last installed filter's behavior.  If there is no filter at all, allow
> > by default.  If there is any operations layer handled filters, core
> > layer's filtering stage sets allowing as the default behavior regardless
> > of the last filter of core layer-handling ones, since the last filter of
> > core layer handled filters in the case is not really the last filter of
> > the entire filtering stage.
> 
> This is not sufficient enough.  Even with this change, core-handled allow
> filters after core-handled reject filters are still meaningless.
> 
> If a region is matched to a core layer handled filter, the allow/reject
> decision should be respected while ignoring all remaining filters, regardless
> of on what layer those are handled.  It works in the way for reect filters,
> since core layer-rejected regions are not passed to the ops layer at all.  In
> case of allow filter, however, the region is passed to ops layer without the
> information about whether it has passed to the ops layer because it was
> allowed, or just not matched to any filter.  Hence, all ops filters can be
> applied to the region.
> 
> We can implement this missing part by storing the core layer filtering stage
> decision somewhere and let ops filter filtering stage repsect it.  Changes like
> attached diff at the end of this mail may work.  I will add such changes to
> next version of this patch series.

I now realize this is not a missing part of this improvement patch series, but
a sole fix for the allow filter behavior.  The current behavior is not matching
with the documented one, and this change will fix it.  I will post a patch for
this fix separately from this patch series.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-28  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-27  1:57 [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] mm/damon: make allow filters after reject filters useful and intuitive SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/9] mm/damon/core: introduce damos->ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/9] mm/damon/paddr: support ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/9] mm/damon/core: support committing ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/9] mm/damon/core: put ops-handled filters to damos->ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/9] mm/damon/paddr: support only damos->ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/9] mm/damon: add default allow/reject behavior fields to struct damos SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/9] mm/damon/core: set damos_filter default allowance behavior based on installed filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  5:50   ` SeongJae Park
2025-02-28  4:48     ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/9] mm/damon/paddr: respect ops_filters_default_reject SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  1:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 9/9] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for changed filter-default behavior SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250228044845.37918-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.