From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Fix suspicious RCU usage
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:27:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250228102726.3429268-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250228102726.3429268-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Commit <d74169ceb0d2> ("iommu/vt-d: Allocate DMAR fault interrupts
locally") moved the call to enable_drhd_fault_handling() to a code
path that does not hold any lock while traversing the drhd list. Fix
it by ensuring the dmar_global_lock lock is held when traversing the
drhd list.
Without this fix, the following warning is triggered:
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.14.0-rc3 #55 Not tainted
-----------------------------
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c:2046 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
2 locks held by cpuhp/1/23:
#0: ffffffff84a67c50 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x87/0x2c0
#1: ffffffff84a6a380 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x87/0x2c0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 23 Comm: cpuhp/1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3 #55
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xb7/0xd0
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x159/0x1f0
? __pfx_enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x10/0x10
enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x151/0x180
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x1df/0x990
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x1ea/0x2c0
smpboot_thread_fn+0x1f5/0x2e0
? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x12a/0x2d0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x4a/0x60
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
Holding the lock in enable_drhd_fault_handling() triggers a lockdep splat
about a possible deadlock between dmar_global_lock and cpu_hotplug_lock.
This is avoided by not holding dmar_global_lock when calling
iommu_device_register(), which initiates the device probe process.
Fixes: d74169ceb0d2 ("iommu/vt-d: Allocate DMAR fault interrupts locally")
Reported-and-tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/Zx9OwdLIc_VoQ0-a@shredder.mtl.com/
Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250218022422.2315082-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 1 +
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 9f424acf474e..e540092d664d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -2043,6 +2043,7 @@ int enable_drhd_fault_handling(unsigned int cpu)
/*
* Enable fault control interrupt.
*/
+ guard(rwsem_read)(&dmar_global_lock);
for_each_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
u32 fault_status;
int ret;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 4d8d4593c9c8..bf1f0c814348 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -3146,7 +3146,14 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
iommu_device_sysfs_add(&iommu->iommu, NULL,
intel_iommu_groups,
"%s", iommu->name);
+ /*
+ * The iommu device probe is protected by the iommu_probe_device_lock.
+ * Release the dmar_global_lock before entering the device probe path
+ * to avoid unnecessary lock order splat.
+ */
+ up_read(&dmar_global_lock);
iommu_device_register(&iommu->iommu, &intel_iommu_ops, NULL);
+ down_read(&dmar_global_lock);
iommu_pmu_register(iommu);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 10:27 [PATCH 0/2] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v6.14-rc5 Lu Baolu
2025-02-28 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Remove device comparison in context_setup_pass_through_cb Lu Baolu
2025-02-28 10:27 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2025-02-28 11:19 ` [PATCH 0/2] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v6.14-rc5 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250228102726.3429268-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.