All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com, willemb@google.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: report output format as TAP 13 in Python tests
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 10:50:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250302105059.5f35fc3b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f196026-02ec-4db0-90b0-10c1e720c345@kernel.org>

On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:52:06 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 28/02/2025 19:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > The Python lib based tests report that they are producing
> > "KTAP version 1", but really we aren't making use of any
> > KTAP features, like subtests. Our output is plain TAP.
> > 
> > Report TAP 13 instead of KTAP 1, this is what mptcp tests do,  
> 
> Indeed, and also TC tests, and all the ones using kselftest_harness.h I
> think.
> 
> > and what NIPA knows how to parse best. For HW testing we need
> > precise subtest result tracking.  
> 
> I guess the best would be to have the kselftests infrastructure fully
> supporting KTAP, and then have a way for each test to print subtests
> correctly, not nested in the comments like it is done for the moment.
> But that looks harder to put in place, and the current solution is used
> in a few areas.

Right. So for additional context for folks less familiar with selftests
the two minor inconveniences which made "supporting KTAP" a less
exciting option are: (a) we run make run_tests which wraps things
in an outer TAP, so we'd end up with a hybrid, anyway; (b) NIPA
only supports one level of subtests.

Thanks for the review!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-02 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-28 18:00 [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: report output format as TAP 13 in Python tests Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-01 10:52 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-03-02 18:50   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-03 23:36 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250302105059.5f35fc3b@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.