From: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/msr: expose MSR_FAM10H_MMIO_CONF_BASE on AMD
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 10:19:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303091908.38846-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> (raw)
The MMIO_CONF_BASE reports the base of the MCFG range on AMD systems.
Currently Linux is unconditionally attempting to read the MSR without a
safe MSR accessor, and since Xen doesn't allow access to it Linux reports
the following error:
unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0xc0010058 at rIP: 0xffffffff8101d19f (xen_do_read_msr+0x7f/0xa0)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? ex_handler_msr+0x11e/0x150
? fixup_exception+0x81/0x300
? exc_general_protection+0x138/0x410
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
? xen_do_read_msr+0x7f/0xa0
xen_read_msr+0x1e/0x30
amd_get_mmconfig_range+0x2b/0x80
quirk_amd_mmconfig_area+0x28/0x100
? quirk_system_pci_resources+0x2b/0x150
pnp_fixup_device+0x39/0x50
__pnp_add_device+0xf/0x150
pnp_add_device+0x3d/0x100
? __pfx_pnpacpi_allocated_resource+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_pnpacpi_allocated_resource+0x10/0x10
? acpi_walk_resources+0xbb/0xd0
pnpacpi_add_device_handler+0x1f9/0x280
acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0x104/0x1c0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x20
? down_timeout+0x3a/0x60
? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x14/0x40
acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x1d0/0x260
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x20
? __pfx_acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0x10/0x10
acpi_get_devices+0x8a/0xb0
? __pfx_pnpacpi_add_device_handler+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_pnpacpi_init+0x10/0x10
pnpacpi_init+0x50/0x80
do_one_initcall+0x46/0x2e0
kernel_init_freeable+0x1da/0x2f0
? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
kernel_init+0x16/0x1b0
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
Such access is conditional to the presence of a device with PnP ID
"PNP0c01", which triggers the execution of the quirk_amd_mmconfig_area()
function. Note that prior to commit 3fac3734c43a MSR accesses when running
as a PV guest would always use the safe variant, and thus silently handle
the #GP.
Fix by allowing access to the MSR on AMD systems, returning 0 for
unprivileged domains (MMIO configuration space disabled), and the native
value for the hardware domain.
The non hardware domain logic will need to be adjusted if in the future we
expose an MCFG region to such domains.
Write attempts to the MSR will still result in #GP for all domain types.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Expand commit message to note which device triggers the MSR read.
---
xen/arch/x86/msr.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
index 1550fd9ec9f3..c1e616a3a757 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
@@ -318,6 +318,21 @@ int guest_rdmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val)
*val = 0;
break;
+ case MSR_FAM10H_MMIO_CONF_BASE:
+ if ( !(cp->x86_vendor & (X86_VENDOR_AMD | X86_VENDOR_HYGON)) )
+ goto gp_fault;
+
+ /*
+ * Report MMIO configuration space is disabled unconditionally for
+ * domUs, as the emulated chipset doesn't support ECAM. For dom0
+ * return the hardware value.
+ */
+ *val = 0;
+ if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && rdmsr_safe(msr, *val) )
+ goto gp_fault;
+
+ break;
+
case MSR_VIRT_SPEC_CTRL:
if ( !cp->extd.virt_ssbd )
goto gp_fault;
--
2.46.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 9:19 Roger Pau Monne [this message]
2025-03-03 13:41 ` [PATCH v2] x86/msr: expose MSR_FAM10H_MMIO_CONF_BASE on AMD Andrew Cooper
2025-03-03 14:13 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-05 9:41 ` Jan Beulich
2025-03-05 9:43 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303091908.38846-1-roger.pau@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.