From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Shahar Shitrit <shshitrit@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/mlx5e: Enable lanes configuration when auto-negotiation is off
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:19:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303141948.53a5cee6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c57977d0-5af6-44b7-80a4-00024f3e5e49@nvidia.com>
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 10:17:58 +0200 Shahar Shitrit wrote:
> On 01/03/2025 0:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:47:49 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> >> + if (table[i].speed == info->speed) {
> >> + if (!info->lanes || table[i].lanes == info->lanes)
> >
> > Hm, on a quick look it seems like lane count was added in all tables,
> > so not sure why the !info->lanes
> >
> it's for the case only speed was passed from ethtool (then ethtool
> passes 0 for lanes)
Makes sense, I think I read the condition backwards TBH
(table[i] vs info).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 11:47 [PATCH net-next 0/6] mlx5 misc enhancements 2025-02-26 Tariq Toukan
2025-02-26 11:47 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/mlx5: Relocate function declarations from port.h to mlx5_core.h Tariq Toukan
2025-02-26 11:47 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/mlx5: Refactor link speed handling with mlx5_link_info struct Tariq Toukan
2025-02-26 11:47 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/mlx5e: Enable lanes configuration when auto-negotiation is off Tariq Toukan
2025-02-28 22:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-02 8:17 ` Shahar Shitrit
2025-03-03 22:19 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-02-28 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-26 11:47 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net/mlx5: Lag, Enable Multiport E-Switch offloads on 8 ports LAG Tariq Toukan
2025-03-04 7:12 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-02-26 11:47 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net/mlx5e: Separate address related variables to be in struct Tariq Toukan
2025-03-04 7:23 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-02-26 11:47 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/mlx5e: Properly match IPsec subnet addresses Tariq Toukan
2025-03-04 7:50 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-03-04 8:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-03-04 9:51 ` Michal Swiatkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303141948.53a5cee6@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shshitrit@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.