From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,ryncsn@gmail.com,minchan@kernel.org,hdanton@sina.com,bigeasy@linutronix.de,senozhatsky@chromium.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:38:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304003841.3BF95C4CEE4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: zram: remove second stage of handle allocation
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: remove second stage of handle allocation
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:03:14 +0900
Previously zram write() was atomic which required us to pass
__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to zsmalloc handle allocation on a fast path and
attempt a slow path allocation (with recompression) if the fast path
failed.
Since we are not in atomic context anymore we can permit direct reclaim
during handle allocation, and hence can have a single allocation path.
There is no slow path anymore so we don't unlock per-CPU stream (and don't
lose compressed data) which means that there is no need to do
recompression now (which should reduce CPU and battery usage).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303022425.285971-6-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 39 +++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1723,11 +1723,11 @@ static int write_incompressible_page(str
static int zram_write_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
{
int ret = 0;
- unsigned long handle = -ENOMEM;
- unsigned int comp_len = 0;
+ unsigned long handle;
+ unsigned int comp_len;
void *dst, *mem;
struct zcomp_strm *zstrm;
- unsigned long element = 0;
+ unsigned long element;
bool same_filled;
/* First, free memory allocated to this slot (if any) */
@@ -1741,7 +1741,6 @@ static int zram_write_page(struct zram *
if (same_filled)
return write_same_filled_page(zram, element, index);
-compress_again:
zstrm = zcomp_stream_get(zram->comps[ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP]);
mem = kmap_local_page(page);
ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comps[ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP], zstrm,
@@ -1751,7 +1750,6 @@ compress_again:
if (unlikely(ret)) {
zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
pr_err("Compression failed! err=%d\n", ret);
- zs_free(zram->mem_pool, handle);
return ret;
}
@@ -1760,35 +1758,12 @@ compress_again:
return write_incompressible_page(zram, page, index);
}
- /*
- * handle allocation has 2 paths:
- * a) fast path is executed with preemption disabled (for
- * per-cpu streams) and has __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM bit clear,
- * since we can't sleep;
- * b) slow path enables preemption and attempts to allocate
- * the page with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM bit set. we have to
- * put per-cpu compression stream and, thus, to re-do
- * the compression once handle is allocated.
- *
- * if we have a 'non-null' handle here then we are coming
- * from the slow path and handle has already been allocated.
- */
- if (IS_ERR_VALUE(handle))
- handle = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len,
- __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM |
- __GFP_NOWARN |
- __GFP_HIGHMEM |
- __GFP_MOVABLE);
+ handle = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len,
+ GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOWARN |
+ __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(handle)) {
zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
- atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.writestall);
- handle = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len,
- GFP_NOIO | __GFP_HIGHMEM |
- __GFP_MOVABLE);
- if (IS_ERR_VALUE(handle))
- return PTR_ERR((void *)handle);
-
- goto compress_again;
+ return PTR_ERR((void *)handle);
}
if (!zram_can_store_page(zram)) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are
zram-sleepable-entry-locking.patch
zram-permit-preemption-with-active-compression-stream.patch
zram-remove-unused-crypto-include.patch
zram-remove-max_comp_streams-device-attr.patch
zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch
zram-add-gfp_nowarn-to-incompressible-zsmalloc-handle-allocation.patch
zram-remove-writestall-zram_stats-member.patch
zram-limit-max-recompress-prio-to-num_active_comps.patch
zram-filter-out-recomp-targets-based-on-priority.patch
zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch
zram-move-post-processing-target-allocation.patch
zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch
zsmalloc-sleepable-zspage-reader-lock.patch
zsmalloc-introduce-new-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-switch-to-new-zsmalloc-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-permit-reclaim-in-zstd-custom-allocator.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-recompress_store-error-path.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-writeback_store-error-path.patch
zram-add-might_sleep-to-zcomp-api.patch
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 0:38 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-21 23:42 + zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304003841.3BF95C4CEE4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.