From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Check BAR index for validity
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:31:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304143112.104190-2-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
Many functions in PCI use accessor macros such as pci_resource_len(),
which take a BAR index. That index, however, is never checked for
validity, potentially resulting in undefined behavior by overflowing the
array pci_dev.resource in the macro pci_resource_n().
Since many users of those macros directly assign the accessed value to
an unsigned integer, the macros cannot be changed easily anymore to
return -EINVAL for invalid indexes. Consequently, the problem has to be
mitigated in higher layers.
Add pci_bar_index_valid(). Use it where appropriate.
Reported-by: Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/adb53b1f-29e1-3d14-0e61-351fd2d3ff0d@linux.intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/devres.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
drivers/pci/iomap.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/pci/pci.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/pci/pci.h | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/devres.c b/drivers/pci/devres.c
index 3431a7df3e0d..d2c09589c537 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/devres.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/devres.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table(struct pci_dev *pdev,
{
void __iomem **legacy_iomap_table;
- if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS)
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
return -EINVAL;
legacy_iomap_table = (void __iomem **)pcim_iomap_table(pdev);
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ static void pcim_remove_bar_from_legacy_table(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar)
{
void __iomem **legacy_iomap_table;
- if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS)
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
return;
legacy_iomap_table = (void __iomem **)pcim_iomap_table(pdev);
@@ -655,6 +655,9 @@ void __iomem *pcim_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
void __iomem *mapping;
struct pcim_addr_devres *res;
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return NULL;
+
res = pcim_addr_devres_alloc(pdev);
if (!res)
return NULL;
@@ -722,6 +725,9 @@ void __iomem *pcim_iomap_region(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
int ret;
struct pcim_addr_devres *res;
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
res = pcim_addr_devres_alloc(pdev);
if (!res)
return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -823,6 +829,9 @@ static int _pcim_request_region(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, const char *name,
int ret;
struct pcim_addr_devres *res;
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
res = pcim_addr_devres_alloc(pdev);
if (!res)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -991,6 +1000,9 @@ void __iomem *pcim_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
void __iomem *mapping;
struct pcim_addr_devres *res;
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
res = pcim_addr_devres_alloc(pdev);
if (!res)
return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/iomap.c b/drivers/pci/iomap.c
index 9fb7cacc15cd..0cab82cbcc99 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/iomap.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/iomap.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include "pci.h" /* for pci_bar_index_is_valid() */
+
/**
* pci_iomap_range - create a virtual mapping cookie for a PCI BAR
* @dev: PCI device that owns the BAR
@@ -33,12 +35,18 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *dev,
unsigned long offset,
unsigned long maxlen)
{
- resource_size_t start = pci_resource_start(dev, bar);
- resource_size_t len = pci_resource_len(dev, bar);
- unsigned long flags = pci_resource_flags(dev, bar);
+ resource_size_t start, len;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return NULL;
if (len <= offset || !start)
return NULL;
+
+ start = pci_resource_start(dev, bar);
+ len = pci_resource_len(dev, bar);
+ flags = pci_resource_flags(dev, bar);
+
len -= offset;
start += offset;
if (maxlen && len > maxlen)
@@ -77,17 +85,21 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range(struct pci_dev *dev,
unsigned long offset,
unsigned long maxlen)
{
- resource_size_t start = pci_resource_start(dev, bar);
- resource_size_t len = pci_resource_len(dev, bar);
- unsigned long flags = pci_resource_flags(dev, bar);
-
+ resource_size_t start, len;
+ unsigned long flags;
- if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
return NULL;
-
if (len <= offset || !start)
return NULL;
+ start = pci_resource_start(dev, bar);
+ len = pci_resource_len(dev, bar);
+ flags = pci_resource_flags(dev, bar);
+
+ if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
+ return NULL;
+
len -= offset;
start += offset;
if (maxlen && len > maxlen)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 869d204a70a3..da82d734d09c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -3921,6 +3921,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root);
*/
void pci_release_region(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar)
{
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return;
+
/*
* This is done for backwards compatibility, because the old PCI devres
* API had a mode in which the function became managed if it had been
@@ -3965,6 +3968,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_release_region);
static int __pci_request_region(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
const char *name, int exclusive)
{
+ if (!pci_bar_index_is_valid(bar))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (pci_is_managed(pdev)) {
if (exclusive == IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE)
return pcim_request_region_exclusive(pdev, bar, name);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 01e51db8d285..ae8b2f5c118b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -167,6 +167,14 @@ static inline void pci_wakeup_event(struct pci_dev *dev)
pm_wakeup_event(&dev->dev, 100);
}
+static inline bool pci_bar_index_is_valid(int bar)
+{
+ if (bar < 0 || bar >= PCI_NUM_RESOURCES)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static inline bool pci_has_subordinate(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
{
return !!(pci_dev->subordinate);
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 14:31 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-03-04 22:42 ` [PATCH] PCI: Check BAR index for validity Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-05 7:03 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-03-05 7:14 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-03-10 2:43 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304143112.104190-2-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.