From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/9] Define user structure for events and responses.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 12:13:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202503051149.MimDe0ds-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cde6bbf0b52710b33170f2787fdcb11538e40813.1741047969.git.m@maowtm.org>
Hi Tingmao,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.14-rc5 next-20250304]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tingmao-Wang/Define-the-supervisor-and-event-structure/20250304-092354
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cde6bbf0b52710b33170f2787fdcb11538e40813.1741047969.git.m%40maowtm.org
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 5/9] Define user structure for events and responses.
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20250305 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250305/202503051149.MimDe0ds-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250305/202503051149.MimDe0ds-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503051149.MimDe0ds-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> security/landlock/syscalls.c:137:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_358' declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: __alignof__(typeof(*event)) != 8
137 | BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(typeof(*event)) != 8);
| ^
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
| ^
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:542:2: note: expanded from macro 'compiletime_assert'
542 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:530:2: note: expanded from macro '_compiletime_assert'
530 | __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:523:4: note: expanded from macro '__compiletime_assert'
523 | prefix ## suffix(); \
| ^
<scratch space>:137:1: note: expanded from here
137 | __compiletime_assert_358
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +137 security/landlock/syscalls.c
82
83 /*
84 * This function only contains arithmetic operations with constants, leading to
85 * BUILD_BUG_ON(). The related code is evaluated and checked at build time,
86 * but it is then ignored thanks to compiler optimizations.
87 */
88 static void build_check_abi(void)
89 {
90 struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr;
91 struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath_attr;
92 struct landlock_net_port_attr net_port_attr;
93 size_t ruleset_size, path_beneath_size, net_port_size;
94 struct landlock_supervise_event *event;
95 struct landlock_supervise_response response;
96 size_t supervise_evt_size, supervise_response_size;
97
98 /*
99 * For each user space ABI structures, first checks that there is no
100 * hole in them, then checks that all architectures have the same
101 * struct size.
102 */
103 ruleset_size = sizeof(ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs);
104 ruleset_size += sizeof(ruleset_attr.handled_access_net);
105 ruleset_size += sizeof(ruleset_attr.scoped);
106 ruleset_size += sizeof(ruleset_attr.supervisor_fd);
107 ruleset_size += sizeof(ruleset_attr.pad);
108 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ruleset_attr) != ruleset_size);
109 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ruleset_attr) != 32);
110
111 path_beneath_size = sizeof(path_beneath_attr.allowed_access);
112 path_beneath_size += sizeof(path_beneath_attr.parent_fd);
113 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(path_beneath_attr) != path_beneath_size);
114 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(path_beneath_attr) != 12);
115
116 net_port_size = sizeof(net_port_attr.allowed_access);
117 net_port_size += sizeof(net_port_attr.port);
118 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(net_port_attr) != net_port_size);
119 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(net_port_attr) != 16);
120
121 /* Check that anything before the destname does not have holes */
122 supervise_evt_size = sizeof(event->hdr.type);
123 supervise_evt_size += sizeof(event->hdr.length);
124 supervise_evt_size += sizeof(event->hdr.cookie);
125 BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetofend(typeof(*event), hdr) != 8);
126 supervise_evt_size += sizeof(event->access_request);
127 supervise_evt_size += sizeof(event->accessor);
128 supervise_evt_size += sizeof(event->fd1);
129 supervise_evt_size += sizeof(event->fd2);
130 BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*event), destname) != supervise_evt_size);
131 BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*event), destname) != 28);
132
133 /*
134 * Make sure this struct does not end up with stricter
135 * alignment than 8
136 */
> 137 BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(typeof(*event)) != 8);
138
139 supervise_response_size = sizeof(response.length);
140 supervise_response_size += sizeof(response.decision);
141 supervise_response_size += sizeof(response._reserved);
142 supervise_response_size += sizeof(response.cookie);
143 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(response) != supervise_response_size);
144 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(response) != 8);
145 }
146
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 1:12 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Landlock supervise: a mechanism for interactive permission requests Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 1:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] Define the supervisor and event structure Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 1:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] Refactor per-layer information in rulesets and rules Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 19:49 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-06 2:58 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-08 18:57 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-10 0:38 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 1:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] Adds a supervisor reference in the per-layer information Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 1:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] User-space API for creating a supervisor-fd Tingmao Wang
2025-03-05 16:09 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-10 0:41 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-11 19:28 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-26 0:06 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-04-11 10:55 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-04 1:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] Define user structure for events and responses Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 19:49 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-06 3:05 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-08 19:07 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-10 0:39 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-11 19:29 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-10 0:39 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-11 19:28 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-11 23:18 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-12 11:49 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-26 0:02 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-05 4:13 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-03-04 1:13 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] Creating supervisor events for filesystem operations Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 19:50 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-10 0:39 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-11 19:29 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-05 5:05 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-04 1:13 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] Implement fdinfo for ruleset and supervisor fd Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 1:13 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] Implement fops for supervisor-fd Tingmao Wang
2025-03-04 1:13 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] Enhance the sandboxer example to support landlock-supervise Tingmao Wang
2025-03-05 3:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-04 19:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Landlock supervise: a mechanism for interactive permission requests Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-06 2:57 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-06 17:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-03-08 19:14 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-11 0:42 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-11 19:28 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-11 20:58 ` Song Liu
2025-03-11 22:03 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-11 23:23 ` Song Liu
2025-03-12 11:50 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-12 10:58 ` Jan Kara
2025-03-12 12:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-03-08 18:57 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-06 21:04 ` Jan Kara
2025-03-08 19:15 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-03-12 6:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2025-03-24 1:58 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-03-24 10:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-15 2:41 ` Tingmao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202503051149.MimDe0ds-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.