From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7C9C19F32 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B523CA15A for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:26:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB6553CA0CC for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:26:09 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26A1C1A00653 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:26:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2668921163; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:26:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1741339568; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E+URSxYtcWw7yyn+ZO/M7eiY/RIxFJe3gYnuR2J1vV4=; b=FPRY5ndriYTE7jKzT/UqtH8jrAiTaKLF5XBI7ibjm6g104rkSho8bJQMBirRwVAKKKF5F4 JIdBVtHPdUJZC2deaFDNSeB7D/Xk3dpoXoGPshl4oepsTpI/L0P7OfRLsB9MHF1bh35X38 4vOmXOZeFWkAJXSq+TNtIPTAUp9jgnc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1741339568; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E+URSxYtcWw7yyn+ZO/M7eiY/RIxFJe3gYnuR2J1vV4=; b=LC/5hTcnX4vr7X1Vno2lnXCvmKRY7rJh3WXTmynO7SiKuZyWISw4Fxd/bIaZcW6wlrXoxa Lpn0UqO14tJ7v9DQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1741339568; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E+URSxYtcWw7yyn+ZO/M7eiY/RIxFJe3gYnuR2J1vV4=; b=FPRY5ndriYTE7jKzT/UqtH8jrAiTaKLF5XBI7ibjm6g104rkSho8bJQMBirRwVAKKKF5F4 JIdBVtHPdUJZC2deaFDNSeB7D/Xk3dpoXoGPshl4oepsTpI/L0P7OfRLsB9MHF1bh35X38 4vOmXOZeFWkAJXSq+TNtIPTAUp9jgnc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1741339568; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E+URSxYtcWw7yyn+ZO/M7eiY/RIxFJe3gYnuR2J1vV4=; b=LC/5hTcnX4vr7X1Vno2lnXCvmKRY7rJh3WXTmynO7SiKuZyWISw4Fxd/bIaZcW6wlrXoxa Lpn0UqO14tJ7v9DQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B7913A22; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id hKT+Na+7ymciRgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:26:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:26:06 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Andrea Cervesato Message-ID: <20250307092606.GA263657@pevik> References: <67cabd64-fb43-4d1a-a471-995fd51a0e2b@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67cabd64-fb43-4d1a-a471-995fd51a0e2b@suse.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:replyto]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] Meetings schedule X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: "Ricardo B. Marliere" , Xiao Yang , Linux Test Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, all, [ Cc hopefully all relevant people ] Thanks for raising this, I'm sorry you have to wait 2 months to reply. > Hello everyone, > As you may have noticed, we haven't been able to follow our regular monthly > schedule for LTP meetings. This has been due to time constraints on my end, > as well as holidays and other commitments. As we enter the new year, I > believe it would be beneficial to establish a consistent schedule so we can > meet more frequently via public video calls. > I have a few proposals for our meeting frequency: > - Monthly meetings > - Meetings every two months > - Meetings after each release I guess once a month is OK. Or, if it's too much to somebody once every 2 months. I'm not sure if it should be aimed before the release or after the release. > I suggest we aim to hold our meetings during the first week of the month. If > a meeting cannot be held due to public holidays, we can consider > rescheduling it for the following week. LGTM. Which day? I would prefer not Friday. Also, I would prefer it not clash with OATS monthly call: which is *second* Thursday in month, 14:00 UTC (15h CET). Kind regards, Petr > Please feel free to share your suggestions and vote based on your > preferences. I look forward to hearing your thoughts! :-) > Best regards, > Andrea Cervesato -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp