From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] bcachefs: Data move can read from poisoned extents
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:15:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250311201518.3573009-12-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311201518.3573009-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Now, if an extent is poisoned we can move it even if there was a
checksum error. We'll have to give it a new checksum, but the poison bit
means that userspace will still see the appropriate error when they try
to read it.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
---
fs/bcachefs/extents.c | 6 +-----
fs/bcachefs/io_read.c | 4 ++++
fs/bcachefs/move.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/extents.c b/fs/bcachefs/extents.c
index 1df0e034e988..03c260f78406 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/extents.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/extents.c
@@ -145,12 +145,8 @@ int bch2_bkey_pick_read_device(struct bch_fs *c, struct bkey_s_c k,
if (k.k->type == KEY_TYPE_error)
return -BCH_ERR_key_type_error;
- struct bkey_ptrs_c ptrs = bch2_bkey_ptrs_c(k);
-
- if (bch2_bkey_extent_ptrs_flags(ptrs) & BIT_ULL(BCH_EXTENT_FLAG_poisoned))
- return -BCH_ERR_extent_poisened;
-
rcu_read_lock();
+ struct bkey_ptrs_c ptrs = bch2_bkey_ptrs_c(k);
const union bch_extent_entry *entry;
struct extent_ptr_decoded p;
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/io_read.c b/fs/bcachefs/io_read.c
index 4fd5a4e646e0..1ff4edac7e81 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/io_read.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/io_read.c
@@ -1022,6 +1022,10 @@ int __bch2_read_extent(struct btree_trans *trans, struct bch_read_bio *orig,
bvec_iter_sectors(iter));
goto out_read_done;
}
+
+ if ((bch2_bkey_extent_flags(k) & BIT_ULL(BCH_EXTENT_FLAG_poisoned)) &&
+ !(flags & BCH_READ_data_update))
+ return -BCH_ERR_extent_poisened;
retry_pick:
ret = bch2_bkey_pick_read_device(c, k, failed, &pick, dev);
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/move.c b/fs/bcachefs/move.c
index 8cfd842a86cf..1e8e51fdad4b 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/move.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/move.c
@@ -114,26 +114,40 @@ static void move_write_done(struct bch_write_op *op)
static void move_write(struct moving_io *io)
{
+ struct bch_fs *c = io->write.op.c;
struct moving_context *ctxt = io->write.ctxt;
+ struct bch_read_bio *rbio = &io->write.rbio;
if (ctxt->stats) {
- if (io->write.rbio.bio.bi_status)
+ if (rbio->bio.bi_status)
atomic64_add(io->write.rbio.bvec_iter.bi_size >> 9,
&ctxt->stats->sectors_error_uncorrected);
- else if (io->write.rbio.saw_error)
+ else if (rbio->saw_error)
atomic64_add(io->write.rbio.bvec_iter.bi_size >> 9,
&ctxt->stats->sectors_error_corrected);
}
- if (unlikely(io->write.rbio.ret ||
- io->write.rbio.bio.bi_status ||
- io->write.data_opts.scrub)) {
+ /*
+ * If the extent has been bitrotted, we're going to have to give it a
+ * new checksum in order to move it - but the poison bit will ensure
+ * that userspace still gets the appropriate error.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(rbio->ret == -BCH_ERR_data_read_csum_err &&
+ (bch2_bkey_extent_flags(bkey_i_to_s_c(io->write.k.k)) & BIT_ULL(BCH_EXTENT_FLAG_poisoned)))) {
+ struct bch_extent_crc_unpacked crc = rbio->pick.crc;
+ struct nonce nonce = extent_nonce(rbio->version, crc);
+
+ rbio->pick.crc.csum = bch2_checksum_bio(c, rbio->pick.crc.csum_type,
+ nonce, &rbio->bio);
+ rbio->ret = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(rbio->ret || io->write.data_opts.scrub)) {
move_free(io);
return;
}
if (trace_io_move_write_enabled()) {
- struct bch_fs *c = io->write.op.c;
struct printbuf buf = PRINTBUF;
bch2_bkey_val_to_text(&buf, c, bkey_i_to_s_c(io->write.k.k));
--
2.47.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 20:15 [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 01/14] bcachefs: Convert read path to standard error codes Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 02/14] bcachefs: Fix BCH_ERR_data_read_csum_err_maybe_userspace in retry path Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 03/14] bcachefs: Read error message now indicates if it was for an internal move Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 04/14] bcachefs: BCH_ERR_data_read_buffer_too_small Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 05/14] bcachefs: Return errors to top level bch2_rbio_retry() Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 06/14] bcachefs: Print message on successful read retry Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 07/14] bcachefs: Don't create bch_io_failures unless it's needed Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 08/14] bcachefs: Checksum errors get additional retries Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 09/14] bcachefs: __bch2_read() now takes a btree_trans Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 10/14] bcachefs: Poison extents that can't be read due to checksum errors Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 12/14] bcachefs: Debug params for data corruption injection Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: Allow REQ_FUA|REQ_READ Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 16:47 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 17:01 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 17:03 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 17:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 17:43 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 18:07 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 18:32 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 18:41 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 12:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 14:13 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 14:49 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 15:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 15:22 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 15:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-17 15:43 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 17:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-17 18:21 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 19:24 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 19:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 20:39 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 21:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-18 1:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 17:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-18 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 18:10 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-18 18:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-20 5:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 10:28 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 0:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 21:33 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 17:32 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-18 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 14/14] bcachefs: Read retries are after checksum errors now REQ_FUA Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot John Stoffel
2025-03-17 21:12 ` errors compiling bcachefs-tools v1.20.0 on debian 12 John Stoffel
2025-03-17 21:48 ` Malte Schröder
2025-03-17 23:10 ` John Stoffel
2025-03-18 21:04 ` John Stoffel
2025-03-18 21:32 ` Malte Schröder
2025-03-19 14:16 ` John Stoffel
2025-03-24 15:25 ` Krzysztof Hajdamowicz
2025-03-26 13:45 ` John Stoffel
2025-03-18 1:15 ` [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 14:47 ` John Stoffel
2025-03-20 17:15 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250311201518.3573009-12-kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--to=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.