From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CCD1BDCF for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741704729; cv=none; b=P7EZSB7GNgyzZ0XrrFhMXW0ePt5lX1KBepS4+kXmYaCgMs5quueGRrjRws8D0XeKO6fLkb1UR8Ze2Z8enM1Fn/U6mQGPrj9eBcmoHh4f3cfV7OOchUn+dphzuf0iBTQ0e4wAD+5l0PeTNJe+JzjStVxXVQq75FHlFyJ6iIjvzIM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741704729; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jjTt3pQS/T5TBwcK+c1BNyfhy0Ht72joFk5RqouvWIY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Jxqrig/N6ks2Nm0DLBb6rA/Qn7RoAv0RwAs9WjOU9zX9jvS9RjTjOpQ24nc6Uk+rAj0YXNDQqZGqzy9vqeb188+1eW3eCggoe4zQ0twfnn/9NJsUdULpAxNfSA3r0aAzYtq1gEziuw820HwNMA79NMXdbqxXh52JcOWM4HwZGOU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ndL35CI3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ndL35CI3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741704728; x=1773240728; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jjTt3pQS/T5TBwcK+c1BNyfhy0Ht72joFk5RqouvWIY=; b=ndL35CI3snBRdqQg4yAjjDU3wSOVpfEn6cv8CQL/yhqal2kEwnlU9418 iHUBBEUKcwKcxxZIP+iBHiNjktz5/f425buUFHUDgeU8kAMUEhlg86gCR Y+AlUxwvQSjEjY6fp14NK09mIs4HbusjsYoymDkSw5OByYklm8cvkkN1Z ++8oOUP/9h6j5X99JHY0LLnw8lM5a8/l3cijoayJ+agHUOnWVJWzJE4kZ PdD7gvhpCJUPY7N8s5Nezy2+/DJVAERRM7j+lSq9zgKRmVDG+tPk5o9HS 9KiTRIKUCjV5giml2A2vhEiEMCaXgqPNfUnLD/TrHm/52qocYiEs+kuzq g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xNt6R1zVQxa/CG3lzkQc8A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: TyE3sr86RHOS50SP98XMmg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11370"; a="42930735" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,239,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="42930735" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2025 07:52:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BNQN/hbQT1CWPTI3g+t1IA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: K8mu9x1RSl+oFV1yb6mssw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,239,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="121238865" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a4747d147074) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2025 07:52:06 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a4747d147074 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ts0xg-0006jk-0G; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:52:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 22:51:42 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Mehdi Djait Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] media: v4l2-common: Add a helper for obtaining the clock producer Message-ID: <202503112248.4yP7WmdR-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250310122305.209534-1-mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250310122305.209534-1-mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com> Hi Mehdi, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on sailus-media-tree/master v6.14-rc6 next-20250311] [cannot apply to sailus-media-tree/streams] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mehdi-Djait/media-v4l2-common-Add-a-helper-for-obtaining-the-clock-producer/20250310-202543 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250310122305.209534-1-mehdi.djait%40linux.intel.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH v2] media: v4l2-common: Add a helper for obtaining the clock producer config: i386-randconfig-054-20250311 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250311/202503112248.4yP7WmdR-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250311/202503112248.4yP7WmdR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503112248.4yP7WmdR-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): ld: drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.o: in function `devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get': >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c:667: undefined reference to `__clk_hw_register_fixed_rate' vim +667 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c 642 643 struct clk *devm_v4l2_sensor_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id) 644 { 645 struct clk_hw *clk_hw; 646 struct clk *clk; 647 u32 rate; 648 int ret; 649 650 clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, id); 651 if (clk) 652 return clk; 653 654 if (!is_acpi_node(dev_fwnode(dev))) 655 return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); 656 657 ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "clock-frequency", &rate); 658 if (ret) 659 return ERR_PTR(ret); 660 661 if (!id) { 662 id = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "clk-%s", dev_name(dev)); 663 if (!id) 664 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 665 } 666 > 667 clk_hw = devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(dev, id, NULL, 0, rate); -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki