All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [jlayton:kdevops 76/81] fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:463:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_rename'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_rename'?
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 03:55:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202503120304.2Flcobhs-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux.git kdevops
head:   86deeee9a2bdf8ba09cfd0ab66dbf448d2e8b82b
commit: 6f74ab2f92f7bac5ff498f008ba91c31cc2ebc10 [76/81] nfsd: add tracepoints to rename events
config: sparc-randconfig-001-20250311 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250312/202503120304.2Flcobhs-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250312/202503120304.2Flcobhs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503120304.2Flcobhs-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_create':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:295:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_create'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_create'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     295 |         trace_nfsd_proc_create(rqstp, dirfhp, S_IFREG, argp->name, argp->len);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_create
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_remove':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:447:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_remove'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_remove'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     447 |         trace_nfsd_proc_remove(rqstp, &argp->fh, argp->name, argp->len);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_remove
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_rename':
>> fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:463:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_rename'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_rename'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     463 |         trace_nfsd_proc_rename(rqstp, &argp->ffh, &argp->tfh, argp->fname,
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_rename
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_link':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:480:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_link'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_link'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     480 |         trace_nfsd_proc_link(rqstp, &argp->ffh, &argp->tfh, argp->tname, argp->tlen);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_link
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_symlink':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:500:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_symlink'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_symlink'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     500 |         trace_nfsd_proc_symlink(rqstp, &argp->ffh, argp->fname, argp->flen,
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_symlink
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:534:1: error: invalid storage class for function 'nfsd_proc_mkdir'
     534 | nfsd_proc_mkdir(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_mkdir':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:542:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_mkdir'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_mkdir'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     542 |         trace_nfsd_proc_mkdir(rqstp, &argp->fh, S_IFDIR, argp->name, argp->len);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_mkdir
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_symlink':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:567:1: error: invalid storage class for function 'nfsd_proc_rmdir'
     567 | nfsd_proc_rmdir(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_rmdir':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:572:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_nfsd_proc_rmdir'; did you mean 'nfsd_proc_rmdir'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     572 |         trace_nfsd_proc_rmdir(rqstp, &argp->fh, argp->name, argp->len);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         nfsd_proc_rmdir
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: In function 'nfsd_proc_symlink':
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:581:13: error: invalid storage class for function 'nfsd_init_dirlist_pages'
     581 | static void nfsd_init_dirlist_pages(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:603:1: error: invalid storage class for function 'nfsd_proc_readdir'
     603 | nfsd_proc_readdir(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:631:1: error: invalid storage class for function 'nfsd_proc_statfs'
     631 | nfsd_proc_statfs(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:816:28: error: initializer element is not constant
     816 |                 .pc_func = nfsd_proc_mkdir,
         |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:816:28: note: (near initialization for 'nfsd_procedures2[14].pc_func')
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:828:28: error: initializer element is not constant
     828 |                 .pc_func = nfsd_proc_rmdir,
         |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:828:28: note: (near initialization for 'nfsd_procedures2[15].pc_func')
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:839:28: error: initializer element is not constant
     839 |                 .pc_func = nfsd_proc_readdir,
         |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:839:28: note: (near initialization for 'nfsd_procedures2[16].pc_func')
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:849:28: error: initializer element is not constant
     849 |                 .pc_func = nfsd_proc_statfs,
         |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:849:28: note: (near initialization for 'nfsd_procedures2[17].pc_func')
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:870:1: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
     870 | };
         | ^
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:863:26: warning: unused variable 'nfsd_version2' [-Wunused-variable]
     863 | const struct svc_version nfsd_version2 = {
         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: At top level:
   fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:491:1: warning: 'nfsd_proc_symlink' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     491 | nfsd_proc_symlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +463 fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c

   456	
   457	static __be32
   458	nfsd_proc_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
   459	{
   460		struct nfsd_renameargs *argp = rqstp->rq_argp;
   461		struct nfsd_stat *resp = rqstp->rq_resp;
   462	
 > 463		trace_nfsd_proc_rename(rqstp, &argp->ffh, &argp->tfh, argp->fname,
   464				       argp->flen, argp->tname, argp->tlen);
   465	
   466		resp->status = nfsd_rename(rqstp, &argp->ffh, argp->fname, argp->flen,
   467					   &argp->tfh, argp->tname, argp->tlen);
   468		fh_put(&argp->ffh);
   469		fh_put(&argp->tfh);
   470		resp->status = nfsd_map_status(resp->status);
   471		return rpc_success;
   472	}
   473	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2025-03-11 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202503120304.2Flcobhs-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.